The Supreme Court holds class on sexual harassment: How to avoid a failing grade

Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 79-91

  Stokes, Pamela P ^a   Stewart Belle, Sue ^a   Barnes, Joyce M ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY CORPUS CHRISTI   (United States)

Author keywords

Gender discrimination; Policy; Practical directives; Sexual harassment; Title VII

Indexed keywords

EID: 52849115976     PISSN: 08927545     EISSN: 15733378     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1007821830426     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Ahmad, S. (1998). Get your sex insurance now. U. S. New & World Report, March 2, 64.
2. Andrews v. City of Philadelphia, 895 F.2d 1469 (3rd Cir. 1990).
3. Barnes v. Costle, 561 F.2d 983 (CADC 1997).
4. Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth, 118 S.Ct. 2257 (1998).
5. DeSantis v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph, 608 F.2d 327 (9th Cir. 1979).
6. Ellison v. Brady, 924 F.2d 872 (9th Cir. 1991).
7. Englander, J. P. (1992). Handling sexual harassment in the workplace. The CPA Journal, February, 14-19.
8. Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 118 S.Ct. 2275 (1998).
9. Gilsdorf, J. W. (1990). Sexual harassment as a liability issue in communication. The Bulletin, September, 68-76.
10. Haavio-Mannila, E., Kaupinen-Toropainen, K., & Kandolin, K. (1988). The effect of sex composition of the workplace on friendship, romance and sex at work. In B. A. Gutek, A. H. Stromberg, and L. Larwook (eds.), Women and Work: An Annual Review (3) 123-137. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
11. Harris v. Forklift Systems, 114 S.Ct. 367 (1993).
12. Hoyman, M., & Robinson R. (1980). Interpreting the new sexual harassment guidelines. Personnel Journal, December, 996-1000.
13. Jarin, K. M., & Pomfret, E. K. (1998). New rules for same sex harassment, HR Magazine, 43 (7), June, 114-123.
14. Koss, M. P. (1990). The psychological impact of sexual harassment. In M. Paludi (Ed.), Ivory Power: Sexual Harassment on Campus, 73-92. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
15. Larwood, L., Szwajkowski, E., & Rose, S. (1988a). When discrimination makes sense: The rational bias theory of discrimination. In B. A. Gutek, A. H. Stromberg, & L. Larwood (eds.), Women and Work: An Annual Review (3), 265-288. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
16. Larwood, L., Szwajkowski, E., & Rose, S. (1988b). Sex and Race Discrimination resulting from management-client relationships: Rational bias theory of management discrimination. Sex Roles 18, 9-29.
17. MacKinnon, C. A. (1979). Sexual Harassment of Working Women: A Case of Sex Discrimination. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
18. McCalla, R. K. (1991). Stopping Sexual Harassment before it Begins. Management Review, April, 44-56.
19. Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB). (1988). Sexual harassment in the federal government: An update. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
20. Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson, 106 S.Ct. 2399 (1986).
21. Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc., 118 S.Ct. 998 (1998).
22. Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 109 S.Ct. 1775 (1989).
23. Robinson v. Jacksonville Shipyards, Inc., 760 F. Supp. 1486 (M.D. Fla. 1991).
24. Sandroff, R. (1992). Sexual harassment: The inside story. Working Woman, June, 47-51, 78.
25. Weeks v. Baker and McKenzie, 63 Cal. App. 4th 1128 (1998).
26. York, K. M., Barclay, L. A., & Zajack, A. B. (1997). Preventing sexual harassment: The effect of multiple training methods. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 10 (4), 277-289.