Use of partial stimulus information by cochlear implant users and listeners with normal hearing in identifying spoken words: Some preliminary analyses

Volta Review

Volumn 102, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 303-320

  Lachs, Lorin ^a   Weiss, Jonathan W ^b   Pisoni, David B ^b,c  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 52849100547     PISSN: 00428639     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Auer, E.T., Jr., & Bernstein, L.E. (1997). Speechreading and the structure of the lexicon: Computationally modeling the effects of reduced phonetic distinctiveness on lexical uniqueness. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 3704-3710.
2. Bernstein, L.E., Demorest, M.E., & Eberhardt, S.P. (1994). A computational approach to analyzing sentential speech perception: Phoneme-to-phoneme stimulus-response alignment. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 3617-3622.
3. Erber, N.P. (1969). Interaction of audition and vision in the recognition of oral speech stimuli. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 12, 423-424.
4. Erber, N.P. (1975). Auditory-visual perception of speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 40, 481-492.
5. Huttenlocher, D.P., & Zue, V.W. (1984). A model of lexical access from partial phonetic information. Paper presented at the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, San Diego, CA.
6. Kaiser, A.R., Kirk, K.I., Lachs, L., & Pisoni, D.B. (in press). Talker and lexical effects on audiovisual word recognition by adults with cochlear implants. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research.
7. Kirk, K.I. (2000). Challenges in the clinical investigation of cochlear implant outcomes. In J.K. Niparko, K.I. Kirk, N.K. Mellon, A.M. Robbins, D.L. Tucci, & B.S. Wilson (Eds.), Cochlear implants: Principles and practices (pp. 225-258). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
8. Kirk, K.I., Pisoni, D.B., & Osberger, M.J. (1995). Lexical effects on spoken word recognition by pediatric cochlear implant users. Ear & Hearing, 16, 470-481.
9. Lachs, L. (1999). Use of partial stimulus information in spoken word recognition without auditory stimulation. In Research on Spoken Language Processing Progress Report No. 23 (pp. 81-118). Bloomington, IN: Speech Research Laboratory, Indiana University Bloomington.
10. Lachs, L., & Hernández, L.R. (1998). Update: The Hoosier Audiovisual Multitalker Database. In Research on Spoken Language Processing Progress Report No. 22 (pp. 377-388). Bloomington, IN: Speech Research Laboratory, Indiana University.
11. Lachs, L., Pisoni, D.B., & Kirk, K.I. (2001). Use of audiovisual information in speech perception by prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants: A first report. Ear & Hearing, 22, 236-251.
12. Luce, P.A. (1986). Neighborhoods of words in the mental lexicon (Research on Speech Perception Technical Report No. 6). Bloomington, IN: Speech Research Laboratory, Indiana University.
13. Luce, P.A., & Pisoni, D.B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear & Hearing, 19, 1-36.
14. Massaro, D.W., & Cohen, M.M. (1999). Speech perception in perceivers with hearing loss: Synergy of multiple modalities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 21-41.
15. Middleweerd, M.J., & Plomp, R. (1987). The effect of speechreading on the speech-reception threshold in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 82, 2145-2147.
16. Miller, G., & Nicely, P. (1955). An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27, 338-352.
17. Mullennix, J.W., & Pisoni, D.B. (1990). Stimulus variability and processing dependencies in speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 379-390.
18. Mullennix, J.W., Pisoni, D.B., & Martin, C.S. (1989). Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 365-378.
19. Nusbaum, H.C., Pisoni, D.B., & Davis, C.K. (1984). Sizing up the Hoosier mental lexicon: Measuring the familiarity of 20,000 words. In Research on Speech Perception Progress Report No. 10 (pp. 357-376). Bloomington, IN: Speech Research Laboratory, Indiana University.
20. Nygaard, L.C., & Pisoni, D.B. (1998). Talker-specific learning in speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 355-376.
21. Pisoni, D.B. (1999). Individual differences in the effectiveness of cochlear implants. Paper presented at the 138th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, Columbus, OH.
22. Pisoni, D.B. (2000). Cognitive factors and cochlear implants: Some thoughts on perception, learning, and memory in speech perception. Ear & Hearing, 21, 70-78.
23. Pisoni, D.B., Cleary, M., Lachs, L., & Kirk, K.I. (2000). Individual differences in effectiveness of cochlear implants in prelingually deaf children. Paper presented at the American Speech-Language Hearing Association Annual Convention, Washington, DC.
24. Rosenblum, L.D., & Saldaña, H.M. (1996). An audiovisual test of kinematic primitives for visual speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 318-331.
25. Sheffert, S.M., Lachs, L., & Hernández, L.R. (1996). The Hoosier Audiovisual Multitalker Database. In Research on Spoken Language Processing Progress Report No. 21 (pp. 578-583). Bloomington, IN: Speech Research Laboratory, Indiana University.
26. Shipman, D.W., & Zue, V.W. (1982). Properties of large lexicons: Implications for advanced isolated word recognition systems. Paper presented at the IEEE 1982 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.
27. Sumby, W.H., & Pollack, I. (1954). Visual contribution of speech intelligibility in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 26, 212-215.
28. Summerfield, Q. (1987). Some preliminaries to a comprehensive account of audio-visual speech perception. In B. Dodd & R. Campbell (Eds.), Hearing by eye: The psychology of lip-reading (pp. 3-51). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Tyler, R.S., Fryauf-Bertschy, H., Gantz, B.J., Kelsay, D.M.R., Tyler, R.S., et al. (1997). Speech perception by prelingually deaf children using cochlear implants. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 117, 180-187.
30. Tyler, R.S., Opie, J.M., Fryauf-Bertschy, H., & Gantz, B.J. (1992). Future directions for cochlear implants. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 16, 151-163.
31. Tyler, R.S., Tye-Murray, N., & Lansing, C.R. (1988). Electrical stimulation as an aid to speechreading. The Volta Review, 90(5), 119-148.
32. Walden, B.E., Prosek, R.H., Montgomery, A.A., Scherr, C.K., & Jones, C.J. (1977). Effects of training on the visual recognition of consonants. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 20, 130-145.