Governance, leadership and institutional change insouth african higher education: Grappling with instability

Tertiary Education and Management

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 177-192

  Kulati, Tembile ^a  

^a Centre for Higher Education Transformation (CHET)   (South Africa)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 52849094863     PISSN: 13583883     EISSN: 15731936     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13583883.2000.9967022     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Baldrige, VJ. & Deal, T. (eds) (1983). The Dynamics of Organizational Change in Education. Berkeley: McCutchon Publishing Corporation.
2. Baldrige, V.J. (1983). Organizational Characteristics of Colleges and Universities. In VJ. Baldrige & T. Deal (eds), The Dynamics of Organizational Change in Education. Berkeley: McCutchon Publishing Corporation, 38-59.
3. Bargh, C., Scott, P. & Smith, D. (1996). Governing Universities: Changing the Culture?Buckingham: SRHE/OU.
4. Becher, T. & Kogan, M. (1992), Process and Structure in Higher Education. London: Routledge.
5. Bensimon, E.M., Neuman, A., & Birnbaum, R. (1989). Making Sense of Administrative Leadership: The ‘L’ Word in Higher Education, ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. Washington D.C: George Washington University.
6. Bessant, B. (1988). Corporate Management and the Institutions of Higher Education, Australian Universities Review 32(2), 10-13.
7. Bimbaum, R. (1988). How Colleges Work. The Cybernetics of Academic Organization and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
8. Bimbaum, R. (1989). The Cybernetic Institution: Toward an Integration of Governance Theories, Higher Education 18, 239-253.
9. Bimbaum, R. (1992). How Academic Leadership Works: Understanding Success and Failure in the College Presidency. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
10. Clark, B.R. (1983). The Higher Education System: Academic Organization in rossNational Perspective. Berkeley: UCLA Press.
11. Clark, B.R. (1998). Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation. Oxford: Pergamon.
12. Clarke, J., Cochrane, A. & McLaughlin, E. (eds) (1994). Managing Social Policy. London: Sage.
13. Dearlove, J. (1995). Collegiality, Managerialism and Leadership in English Universities, Tertiary Education and Management 1(2), 161-169.
14. Department of Education (1997). Education White Paper 3: A Programme for the Transformation of Higher Education. Pretoria: Department of Education.
15. Department of Education (1997). The Higher Education Act (No. 101). Pretoria:Department of Education.
16. Hearn, C.J. (1996). Transforming U.S. Higher Education: An Organizational Perspective, Innovative Higher Education (Winter) 21(2), 141-153.
17. Julius, D.J., Baldridge, J.V. & Pfeffer, J. (1999). A Memo from Machiavelli, The Journal of Higher Education (March/April) 70(2), 113-133.
18. Kooimans, J. (ed.) (1993). Modem Governance: New Govemment-Society Interactions. London: Sage.
19. Lockwood, G. (1985). Universities as Organisations. In G. Lockwood & J. Davies (eds), Universities: The Management Challenge. Berkshire: NFER-Nelson.
20. Maassen, P.A.M. (1994). The Rise and Impact of the ‘Evaluative State’: The Issue of Quality in European Higher Education. Paper presented at CUP Conference The Future Role of Universities in the South African Tertiary Education System.
21. Martin, P.Y. & Turner, B.A. (1986). Grounded Theory and Organizational Research, Journal of Applied Behavioral Studies 22(2), 141-157.
22. Meek, V. Lynn & Wood, F. (1997). Higher Education Governance and Management: An Australian Study. Canberra: Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
23. Middlehurst, R. & Elton, L. (1992). Leadership and Management in Higher Education, Studies in Higher Education 17(3), 251-264.
24. Middlehurst, R. (1993). Leading Academics. Buckingham: SRHE/OU.
25. Miller, D. (1995). The Management of Change in Universities: Universities, State and Economy in Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom. Buckingham: SRHE/OU.
26. Morgan, G. (1997). Images of Organization. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
27. National Commission on Higher Education (1996). A Framework for Transformation. Pretoria.
28. Neave, G. (1988). On the Cultivation of Quality, Efficiency and Enterprise: An Overview of Recent Trends in Higher Education in Western Europe, 1986-1988, European Journal of Education 23(1/2), 7-23.
29. Neave, G. & van Vught F. (eds) (1991). Prometheus Bound: The Changing Relationship Between Government and Higher Education in Western Europe. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
30. Plowman, T. (1998). The Story of Closely and Loosely Coupled Organizations, Journal of Higher Education Policy 20(1), 13-18.
31. Pollitt, C. (1987). The Politics of Performance Assessment: Lessons for Higher Education? Studies in Higher Education 12(1), 87-98.
32. Reed, M.I. (1992). The Sociology of Organizations: Themes, Perspectives and Prospects. Hampstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
33. Sizer, J., Spee, A. & Bormans, R. (1992). The Role of Performance Indicators in Higher Education, Higher Education 24(2), 133-155.
34. Spee, A. & Bormans, R. (1992). Performance Indicators in Government-Institutional Relations: The Conceptual Framework, Higher Education Management 4(2), 131-138.
35. Trow, M. (1994). Managerialism and the Academic Profession: The Case of England, Higher Educational Policy 7(2), 11-18.
36. Walford, G. (1987). Restructuring Universities: Politics and Power in the Management of Change. London: Croom Helm.
37. Weick, K. (1983). Educational Organizations as Loosely Coupled Systems. In V. Baldridge & T. Deal (eds), The Dynamics of Organizational Change in Education. Berkeley: Mc Cutchon Publishing Corporation, 15-37.