The use of funding to encourage quality in academic programmes: Some lessons from experience, and their applicability

Quality in Higher Education

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 33-44

  Yorke, Mantz ^a  

^a LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 52849094384     PISSN: 13538322     EISSN: 14701081     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1353832960020104     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Arkansas State Board for Higher Education (ASBHE). 1994. Productivity enhancement for Arkansas Higher Education, Little Rock: A. ASBHE. mimeo
2. Banta, T., ed. 1986. Performance Funding in Higher Education: a critical analysis of Tennessee's experience, Boulder, CO.: NCHEMS.
3. Banta, T., 1988. “ Assessment as an instrument of state funding policy ”. In Implementing Outcomes Assessment: promise and perils. New Directions for Institutional Research, No 59, Edited by: Banta, T., 81–94. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. Banta, T.W., Rudolph, L.B., Van Dyke, J., and Fisher, H.S., 1995. Performance Funding Comes of Age in Tennessee, Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University—Purdue University Indianapolis. mimeo
5. Bauer, M., Performance-based funding and institutional quality assurance and development. Paper presented at the 15th EAIR Forum. Türkü. mimeo
6. Bauer, M., 1995, Personal communication
7. Chaffee, E.E., and Sherr, L.A., 1992. Quality: transforming postsecondary education, ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No 3 Washington, DC: The George Washington University School of Education and Human Development.
8. Centre for Higher Education Studies. 1994. Assessment of the Quality of Higher Education: a review and an evaluation, Report for the Higher Education Funding Councils for England and Wales the Barnett Report London: CHES, Institute of Education, University of London.
9. Coopers & Lybrand. 1993. Review of Quality Audit, Report for the Higher Education Quality Council London: Coopers & Lybrand.
10. Committee for Quality Assurance in Higher Education. 1994. Report on 1993 Quality Reviews, Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
11. Committee for Quality Assurance in Higher Education. 1995a. Report on 1994 Quality Reviews, Volume 1, Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
12. Committee for Quality Assurance in Higher Education. 1995b. Quality Assurance Program Guidelines, April 1995, Canberra: CQAHE.
13. Committee of Scottish Education Principals. 1993. Teaching and Learning in an Expanding Higher Education System the MacFarlane Report, Edinburgh: CSUP.
14. Elton, L., 1995. Enterprise in higher education: issues in education. Higher Education Quarterly, 49: 146–161.
15. Elton, L., and Cryer, P., 1994. Quality and change in higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 18: 205–220.
16. Ewell, P., 1986. “ Performance funding and institutional response: lessons from the Tennessee experience ”. In Performance Funding in Higher Education: a critical analysis of Tennessee's experience, Edited by: Banta, T., 105–120. Boulder, CO: NCHEMS.
17. Ewell, P.T., 1994. Developing Statewide Performance Indicators for Higher Education: policy themes and variations, Boulder, CO: NCHEMS. mimeo
18. Folger, J., and Jones, D.P., 1993. Using Fiscal Policy to Achieve State Education Goals, Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
19. Hartley, D., 1995. Teaching and Learning in an Expanding Higher Education System (the MacFarlane Report): a technical fix?. Studies in Higher Education, 20: 147–158.
20. Hoachlander, E.G., Choy, S.P., and Brown, C.L., 1989. Performance-based Policies Options for Postsecondary Vocational Education: a feasibility study, Berkeley, CA: MPR Associates. ERIC ED 315 535
21. Jones, D.P., and Ewell, P., 1993. “ Planning, budgeting and the assessment of performance: a US perspective ”. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Assessing Quality in Higher Education, (Gustav-Stresemann-Institut Edited by: Banta, T., 387–396. Bonn) (Indianapolis, IA: Indiana University--Purdue University.
22. Kentucky Council on Higher Education (KCHE). 1994. Performance Funding, Frankfort, Ky: KCHE. mimeo
23. Kuhn, T.S., 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
24. Laurillard, D., 1993. Rethinking University Teaching: a framework for the effective use of educational technology, London: Routledge.
25. MacFarlane, A.G.J., 1995. Education: past ideas, future visions and present realities. Innovation and Learning in Education, 1: 5–14.
26. Massaro, V., 1995. Quality measurement in Australia: an assessment of the holistic approach. Higher Education Management, 7: 81–99.
27. Missouri Co-ordinating Board for Higher Education (MCBHE). 1994. FIPSE grant proposal preapplication, 10 January mimeo
28. National Center for Higher Education Management Systems. 1992. An Evaluation of the Ohio Selective Excellence Program, Boulder, CO: NCHEMS.
29. 1993. Papers in. Higher Education 25, a special edition devoted to TQM in higher education
30. Senge, P.M., 1992. The Fifth Discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization, London: Century Business.
31. Tennessee Higher Education Commission (THEC). 1992. Performance Funding Standards, 1992-93 through 1996-97 mimeo
32. Trow, M., Reflections on the reform of Swedish higher education. Paper read at a seminar at the Royal Institute of Technology. April29, Stockholm. mimeo
33. Truxal, J.G., 1989. Toward Excellence in Higher Education in New Jersey, Stony Brook, NY: State University of New York. mimeo
34. Twigg, C.A., 1995. The Need for a National Learning Infrastructure, Washington: Educom.
35. Van Vught, F.A., and Westerheijden, D.F., 1993. Quality Management and Quality Assurance in European Higher Education: methods and mechanisms, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
36. Vroeijenstijn, A.I., 1995. Improvement and Accountability: navigating between Scylla and Charybdis, London: Jessica Kingsley.
37. Yorke, M., 1994. Enhancement-led higher education?. Quality Assurance in Education, 2: 6–12.