Mediating factors in the relationship between income and mammography use in low-income insured women

Journal of Women's Health

Volumn 17, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 1371-1378

  Park, Alice N ^a   Buist, Diana S M ^b   Tiro, Jasmin A ^c   Taplin, Stephen H ^c  

^a Urban Indian Health Institute   (United States)

^b CENTER FOR HEALTH STUDIES   (United States)

^c NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DATA BASE; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INSURANCE; LOWEST INCOME GROUP; MAMMOGRAPHY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATIENT TRANSPORT; POVERTY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; TELEPHONE;

AGED; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; INCOME; INSURANCE, HEALTH; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; POVERTY; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 52749087574     PISSN: 15409996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2007.0625     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Edwards BK, Brown ML, Wingo PA, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2002, featuring population-based trends in cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:1407-1427.
2. Blanks RG, Moss SM, McGahan CE, Quinn MJ, Babb PJ. Effect of NHS breast screening programme on mortality from breast cancer in England and Wales, 1990-8: Comparison of observed with predicted mortality. BMJ 2000;321:665-669.
3. Bradley CJ, Given CW, Roberts C. Race, socioeconomic status, and breast cancer treatment and survival. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94:490-496.
4. Urban N, Anderson GL, Peacock S. Mammography screening: How important is cost as a barrier to use? Am J Public Health 1994;84:50-55.
5. Taplin SH, Barlow WE, Ludman E, et al. Testing reminder and motivational telephone calls to increase screening mammography: A randomized study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:233-242.
6. Klassen AC, Smith AL, Meissner HI, Zabora J, Curbow B, Mandelblatt J. If we gave away mammograms, who would get them? A neighborhood evaluation of a no-cost breast cancer screening program. Prev Med 2002;34:13-21.
7. Taplin SH, Ichikawa L, Yood MU, et al. Reason for late-stage breast cancer: Absence of screening or detection, or breakdown in follow-up? J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:1518-1527.
8. Legler J, Meissner HI, Coyne C, Breen N, Chollette V, Rimer BK. The effectiveness of interventions to promote mammography among women with historically lower rates of screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002;11:59-71.
9. Stone EG, Morton SC, Hulscher ME, et al. Interventions that increase use of adult immunization and cancer screening services: A meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2002;136:641-651.
10. Vernon SW, Tiro JA, Meissner HI. Behavioral research in cancer screening. In: Miller S, Bowen D, Croyle R, Rowland J, eds. Handbook of behavioral science and cancer. American Psychological Association. In press.
11. U.S. Census Bureau. Poverty thresholds: 1995. U.S. Bureau of the Census. Current population survey. Available at www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/ threshld/thresh95.html Accessed February 29, 2008.
12. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 1986;51:1173-1182.
13. Tarver-Carr ME, Powe NR, Eberhardt MS, et al. Excess risk of chronic kidney disease among African-American versus white subjects in the United States: A population-based study of potential explanatory factors. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002;13:2363-2370.
14. Buist DSM, Porter PL, Lehman C, Taplin SH, White E. Factors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40-49 years. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:1432-1440.
15. Greenland S. Introduction to regression modeling. In: Rothman K, Greenland S, eds. Modern epidemiology. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1998:401-434.
16. 2001 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS): Public use data release. Hyattsville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2003.
17. Ludman EJ, Curry SJ, Meyer D, Taplin SH. Implementation of outreach telephone counseling to promote mammography participation. Health Educ Behav 1999;26:689-702.
18. Lawson HW, Henson R, Bobo JK, Kaeser MK. Implementing recommendations for the early detection of breast and cervical cancer among low-income women. Oncology 2000;14:1528-1530.
19. Moon M. Medicare beneficiaries and their assets: Implications for low-income programs. The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, Menlo Park, CA, 2002.
20. Zhu K, Hunter S, Bernard LJ, Payne-Wilks K, Roland CL, Levine RS. Mammography screening in single older African-American women: A study of related factors. Ethnicity Dis 2000;10:395-405.
21. Andersen MR, Yasui Y, Meischke H, Kuniyuki A, Etzioni R, Urban N. The effectiveness of mammography promotion by volunteers in rural communities. Am J Prev Med 2000;18:199-207.
22. Danigelis NL, Ashley JA, Worden JK Dorwaldt AL, Roberson NL. Two community outreach strategies to increase breast cancer screening among low-income women. J Cancer Educ 2001;16:55-58.
23. Halliday T, Taira DA, Davis J, Chan H. Socioeconomic disparities in breast cancer screening in Hawaii. Prev Chronic Dis 2007;4:A91.
24. Wardle J, McCaffery K, Nadel M, Atkin W. Socioeconomic differences in cancer screening participation: Comparing cognitive and psychosocial explanations. Soc Sci Med 2004;59:249-261.
25. Bastani R, Maxwell AE, Bradford C. Cross-sectional versus prospective predictors of screening mammography. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1996;5:845-848.
26. Vernon SW, Briss PA, Tiro JA, Warnecke RB. Some methodologic lessons learned from cancer screening research. Cancer 2004; 101(Suppl 5):1131-1145.