Transition prediction for three-dimensional flows using parallel computation

Computers and Fluids

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 121-136

  Krimmelbein, N ^a   Radespiel, R ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF BRAUNSCHWEIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMICS; BOUNDARY LAYERS; CHLORINE COMPOUNDS; CODES (STANDARDS); CODES (SYMBOLS); DECISION MAKING; DRAG REDUCTION; FORECASTING; HYDRODYNAMICS; METEOROLOGY; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; NUMERICAL METHODS; OPTICAL BISTABILITY; PLANNING; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SYSTEM STABILITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL; TRANSPORT AIRCRAFT;

A-STABILITY; COMPLEX GEOMETRIES; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HIGH-ACCURACY; LAYER DATA; NAVIER-STOKES CODE; NAVIER-STOKES SOLVERS; NUMERICA L RESULTS; PARALLEL COMPUTATIONS; PARALLEL PERFORMANCE; PROGRAM SYSTEM; PROLATE SPHEROIDS; STABILITY ANALYSIS; THREE-DIMENSIONAL FLOWS; TRANSITION LINES; TRANSITION PREDICTION;

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS;

EID: 52749087480     PISSN: 00457930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2008.01.004     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Arnal D., and Juillen J.C. Leading edge contamination and relaminarisation on a swept wing at incidence. In: Cebeci T. (Ed). Fourth symposium on numerical and physical aspects of aerodynamic flows. 16-19 January 1989 (1989), California State University, Springer, Long Beach, California, USA
2. Arnal D. Boundary layer transition: prediction based on linear theory. AGARD-R-793; 1994.
3. Arthur MT, Atkin CJ. Transition modelling for viscous flow prediction. In: 36th AIAA fluid dynamics conference and exhibit, San Francisco, AIAA-2006-3052; 2006.
4. Cliquet J, Houdeville R, Arnal D. Application of laminar-turbulent transition criteria in Navier-Stokes computations. In: 45th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, Nevada, AIAA-2007-515; 2007.
5. Gaster M. A note on the relation between temporally increasing and spatially increasing disturbances in hydrodynamic stability. J Fluid Mech 14 (1962)
6. Hirschel E.H. Basics of aerothermodynamics (2005), Springer, Berlin Heidelberg. 978-3-540-26519-1 p. 201
7. Kaups K., and Cebeci T. Compressible laminar boundary layers with suction on swept and tapered wings. J Aircaft 14 7 (1977)
8. Kreplin H-P, Meier HU, Maier A. Wind tunnel model and measuring techniques for the investigation of three-dimensional turbulent boundary layers. In: 10th AIAA aerodynamic testing conference, San Diego, AIAA-78-781; 1978.
9. Kreplin H-P, Vollmers H, Meier HU. Wall shear stress measurements on an inclined prolate spheroid in the DFVLR 3 m × 3 m low speed wind tunnel, Göttingen. DFVLR-AVA, report IB 22-84 A 33; 1985.
10. Krimmelbein N, Radespiel R, Nebel C. Numerical aspects of transition prediction for three-dimensional configurations. In: 35th AIAA fluid dynamics conference and exhibit, Toronto, AIAA-2005-4764; 2005.
11. Kroll N, Becker K, Rieger H, Thiele F. Ongoing activities in flow simulation and shape optimization within the German Megadesign project. ICAS 2006. In: 25th international congress of the aeronautical sciences; 2006.
12. Krumbein A. Automatic transition prediction for high-lift systems using a hybrid flow solver. J Aircraft 42 (2005) 1362-1366
13. Krumbein A. Automatic transition prediction and application to 3D Wing configurations. In: 44th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, AIAA-2006-914; 2006.
14. Krumbein A, Krimmelbein N, Schrauf G. Application of a hybrid Navier-Stokes solver with automatic transition prediction. In: 25th AIAA applied aerodynamics conference, 25-28 June 2007, Miami, AIAA-2007-4284; 2007.
15. Krumbein A, Krimmelbein N. Navier-Stokes high-lift airfoil computations with automatic transition prediction using the DLR TAU Code. In: Tropea C, Jakirlic S, Heinemann H J, Henke R, Hnlinger H, editors. New results in numerical and experimental fluid mechanics VI. Contributions to the 15th STAB/DGLR symposium, Darmstadt, Germany, 2006. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer; 2007. ISBN 978-3-540-74458-0.
16. Langtry R.B., Menter F.R., Likki S.R., Suzen Y.B., Huang P.G., and Völker S. A correlation-based transition model using local variables - Part II: Test cases and industrial applications. J Turbomach 128 (2006)
17. Menter F.R., Langtry R.B., Likki S.R., Suzen Y.B., Huang P.G., and Völker S. A correlation-based transition model using local variables - Part I: Model formulation. J Turbomach 128 (2006)
18. Perraud J, Moens F. Transport aircraft 3D high lift wing numerical transition prediction. In: 45th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, Nevada, AIAA-2007-264; 2007.
19. Radespiel R., Windte J., and Scholz U. Numerical and experimental flow analysis of moving airfoils with laminar separation bubbles. AIAA J 45 6 (2006) 1346-1356
20. Redeker G., and Wichmann G. Forward sweep - a favorable concept for a laminar flow wing. J Aircraft 28 2 (1991)
21. Sadarjoen I.A., van Walsum T., Hin A.J.S., and Post F.H. Particle tracing algorithm for 3D curvilinear grids. In: Nielson G., Müller H., and Hagen H. (Eds). Scientific visualisation - overviews, methodologies and techniques (1997), IEE 299-332
22. Schlichting H., and Gersten K. Boundary layer theory. eighth ed. 2000 (2001), Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
23. Schrauf G. Transition prediction using different linear stability analysis strategies. 12th AIAA applied aerodynamics conference, Colorado Springs, AIAA-1994-1848; 1994.
24. Schrauf G., Perraud J., and Lam F. Comparison of boundary-layer transition predictions using flight test data. J Aircraft 35 6 (1998)
25. Schrauf G. COCO - a program to compurte velocity and temperature profiles for local and nonlocal stability analysis of compressible, conical boundary layers with suction. ZARM technik report, November 1998; 1998.
26. Schrauf G. Large-scale laminar-flow tests evaluated with linear stability theory. J Aircraft 41 2 (2004)
27. Schrauf G. LILO 2.1. User's guide and tutorial. GSSC technical report 6; 2006 [originally issued September 2004, modified for Version 2.1].
28. Smith AMO, Gamberoni N. Transition, pressure gradient and stability theory. Douglas Aircraft Company Inc., El Segundo, California, USA, Report ES 26388; 1956.
29. Schwamborn D, Gerhold T, Hannemann V. On the Validation of the DLR-TAU Code. In: Nitsche W, Heinemann H-J, Hilbig R, editors. New results in numerical and experimental fluid mechanics, Notes on numerical fluid mechanics, 72. Vieweg; 1999. p. 426-33, ISBN 3-528-03122-0.
30. Schwamborn D, Gerhold T, Heinrich R. The DLR TAU-Code: recent applications in research and industry. In: Wesseling P, Onate E, Periaux, J, editors. European conference on computational fluid dynamics, ECCOMAS CFD 2006; 2006.
31. N transition prediction in three-dimensional boundary layers on inclined prolate spheroids. AIAA J 44 1 (2006) 108-118
32. Toulorge T, Ponsin J, Perraud J, Moens F. Automatic transition prediction for RANS computations applied to a generic high-lift wing. In: 45th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, Nevada, AIAA-2007-1086; 2007.
33. van Ingen JL. Een semi-empirische methode voor de bepaling van de ligging van het omslaggebied van de greenslaag bij onsamedrukbare tweedimensionale stromingen. Technische Hogeschool Vliegtuigbouwkunde Delft, Nederland, Rapport V.T.H.-71; 1956.
34. Windte J., Scholz U., and Radespiel R. Validation of the RANS-simulation of laminar separation bubbles on airfoils. Aerospace Sci Technol 10 6 (2006) 484-494
35. Wokoeck R, Krimmelbein N, Ortmanns J, Ciobaca V, Radespiel R, Krumbein A. RANS simulation and experiments on the stall behaviour of an airfoil with laminar separation bubbles. In: 44th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, AIAA-2006-244; 2006.
36. Message Passing Interface Forum, MPI: A message-passing interface standard 1.0., Technical report; 1994. .