Male mating strategies through manipulation of female-perceived predation risk: A minireview and a hypothesis

Journal of Ecology and Field Biology

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 1-7

  Han, Chang S ^a   Jablonski, Piotr G ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Gerris gracilicornis; Manipulation; Predation risk; Sensory exploitation; Water strider

Indexed keywords

ARANEAE; DECAPODA (CRUSTACEA); GERRIDAE; GERRIS GRACILICORNIS; SALTICIDAE;

EID: 52749085862     PISSN: 1975020X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5141/jefb.2008.31.1.001     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Andersen NM. 1997. A phylogenetic analysis of the evolution of sexual dimorphism and mating systems in water striders (Hemiptera: Gerridae). Biol J Linn Soc. 61: 345-368.
2. Andersson M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
3. Arnqvist G. 1989. Sexual selection in a water strider: the function, nature of selection and heritability of a male grasping apparatus. Oikos 56: 344-350.
4. Arnqvist, G. 1997. The evolution of water strider mating systems: causes and consequences of sexual conflicts. In: The Evolution of Mating Systems in Insects and Arachnids (Choe J, Crespi B, eds), pp 146-163. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York.
5. Arnqvist G, Rowe L. 2002a. Correlated evolution of male and female morphologies in water striders. Evolution 56: 936-947.
6. Arnqvist G, Rowe L. 2002b. Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects. Nature 415: 787-789.
7. Arnqvist G, Rowe L. 2005. Sexual conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8. Bernal XE, Rand AS, Ryan MJ. 2007. Sexual differences in the behavioral response of túngara frogs, Physalaemus pustulosus, to cues associated with increased predation risk. Ethology 113: 755-763.
9. Berglund A, Rosenqvist G. 1986. Reproductive costs in the prawn Palaemon adspersus: effects on growth and predator vulnerability. Oikos 46: 329-354.
10. Cooper Jr WE, Vitt LJ, Hedges R, Huey RB. 1990. Locomotor impairment and defense in gravid lizards (Eumeces laticeps): behavioral shift in activity may offset costs of reproduction in an active forager. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 27: 153-157.
11. Christy JH. 1995. Mimicry, mate choice, and the sensory trap hypothesis. Am Nat 146: 171-181.
12. Christy JH, Backwell PRY, Goshima S, Kreuter T. 2002. Sexual selection for structure building by courting male fiddler crabs: an experimental study of behavioral mechanisms. Behav Ecol 13: 366-374.
13. Endler JA. 1987. Predation, light intensity and courtship behaviour in Poecilia reticulata (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Anim Behav 35: 1376-1385.
14. Evans JP, Kelley JL, Ramnarine IW, Pilastro A. 2002. Female behaviour mediates male courtship under predation risk in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52: 496-502.
15. Forsgren E. 1992. Predation risk affects mate choice in a gobiid fish. Am Nat 40: 1041-1049.
16. Gong A, Gibson RM. 1996. Reversal of a female preference after visual exposure to a predator in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Anim Behav 52: 1007-1015.
17. Gregory PT, Crampton LH, Skebo KM. 1999. Conflicts and interactions among reproduction, thermoregulation and feeding in viviparous reptiles: are gravid snakes anorexic? J Zool 248: 231-241.
18. Gwynne DT. 1989. Does copulation increase the risk of predation? Trends Ecol Evol 4: 54-56.
19. Han CS, Lee JH, Kang CG, Shin HS, Bae MR, Lee SI, Jabłoński PG. 2007. The role of non-visual indirect sensory information in the effect of operational sex ratio on mating of a water strider. SNU J Student Research [serial online]. Available from: . Accessed 21 Feb 2008.
20. Hedrick AV, Dill LM. 1993. Mate choice by female crickets is influenced by predation risk. Anim Behav 46: 193-196.
21. Johnson JB, Basolo AL. 2003. Predator exposure alters female mate choice in the green swordtail. Behav Ecol 14: 619-625.
22. Kim TW, Christy JH, Choe JC. 2004. Semidome building as sexual signaling in the fiddler crab Uca lacteal (Brachyura: OcyPodidae). J Crustacean Biol 24(4): 673-679.
23. Kim TW, Christy JH, Choe JC. 2007. A Preference for a sexual signal keeps females safe. PLoS ONE 2(5): e422.
24. Koga T, Backwell PRY, Jennions MD, Christy JH. 1998. Elevated predation risk changes mating behaviour and courtship in a fiddler crab. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 265: 1385-1390.
25. Koga T, Backwell PRY, Christy JH, Murai M, Kasuya E. 2001. Male biased predation of a fiddler crab. Anim Behav 62: 201-207.
26. Lima SL, Dill LM. 1990. Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68: 619-640.
27. Longland WS, Jenkins SH. 1987. Sex and age affect vulnerability of desert rodents to owl predation. J Mammal 68(4): 746-754.
28. Magnhagen C. 1991. Predation risk as a cost of reproduction. Trends Ecol Evol 6: 183-186.
29. Magurran AE, Nowak MA. 1991. Another battle of the sexes: the consequences of sexual asymmetry in mating costs and predation risk in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Proc R Soc Lond B 246: 31-38.
30. Maier G, Berger I, Burghard W, Nassal B. 2000. Is mating of copepods associated with increased risk of predation? J Plankton Res 22(10): 1977-1987.
31. Pocklington R, Dill LM. 1995. Predation on females or males: who pays for bright male traits? Anim Behav 49: 1122-1124.
32. Ronkainen H, Ylonen H. 1994. Behaviour of cyclic bank voles under risk of mustelid predation: do females avoid copulations? Oecologia 97(3): 377-381.
33. Rosenqvist G, Berglund A. 1992. Is female sexual behaviour a neglected topic? Trends Ecol Evol 7: 174-176.
34. Rowe L. 1992. Ecology and evolution of reproductive biology in the waterstrider Gerris buenoi. PhD dissertation, University of British Colum.
35. Rowe L. 1994. The costs of mating and mate choice in water striders. Anim Behav 48: 1049-1056.
36. Sakaluk SK, Belwood JJ. 1984. Gecko phonotaxis to cricket calling song: A case of satellite predation. Anim Behav 32: 659-662.
37. Shine R. 1980. "Cost" of reproduction in reptiles. Oecologia 46: 92-100.
38. Shaffer L, Formanowicz D. 1996. A cost of viviparity and parental care in scorpions: reduced sprint speed and behavioural compensation. Anim Behav 51: 1017-1023.
39. Schwarzkopf L, Shine R. 1992. Costs of reproduction in lizards: escape tactics and susceptibility to predation. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 31: 17-25.
40. Seigel RA, Huggins MM, Ford NB. 1987. Reduction in locomotor ability as a cost of reproduction in snakes. Oecologia 73: 481-465.
41. Sih A, Krupa J, Travers S. 1990. An experimental study on the effects of predation risk and feeding regime on the mating behavior of the water strider. Am Nat 135: 284-290.
42. Sih A, Krupa J. 1995. Interacting effects of predation risk and male and female density on male/female conflicts and mating dynamics of stream water striders. Behav Ecol 6: 316-325.
43. Sivinski J. 1980. The effects of mating on predation in the stick insect Diapheromera veliei Walsh (Phasmatodea: Heteronemiidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 73: 553-556.
44. Su KFY, Li D. 2006. Female-biased predation risk and its differential effect on the male courtship behavior of jumping spiders. Anim Behav 71: 531-537.
45. Verrell PA. 1985. Male mate choice for large, fecund females in the red-spotted newt, Notophthalmus viridescens: how is size assessed? Herpetologica 41: 382-386.
46. Vuorinen I, Rajasilta M, Salo J. 1983. Selective predation and habitat shift in a copepod species - support for the predation hypothesis. Oecologia 59: 62-64.
47. Wing SR. 1985. Prolonged copulation in Photinus macdermotti with comparative notes on Photinus collustrans (Coleoptera: Lampyridae). The Florida Entomologist 68(4): 627-634.
48. Wing SR. 1988. Cost of mating for female insects: risk of predation in Photinus collustrans (Coleoptera: Lampyridae). Am Nat 131(1): 139-142.