Humanities collection management— an impressionistic/realistic/optimistic appraisal of the state of the art

Collection Management

Volumn 5, Issue 3-4, 1984, Pages 1-23

  Perrault, Anna H ^a  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 52649178643     PISSN: 01462679     EISSN: 15452549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J105v05n03_01     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. American Library Association. Collection Development Committee. Guidelines for Collection Development, ed. David Perkins. Chicago: ALA, 1979.
2. Biblarz, Dora. “Information is Power: The Future of Collection Development in Libraries,” Library Leadership: Visualizing the Future, ed. by Donald E. Riggs. Phoenix, Arizona: Oryx Press, 1982, 84-93.
3. Boyce, R. Bert and Janet Sue Pollens. “Citation-Based Impact Measures and the Bradfordian Selection Criteria," Collection Management, 4(Fall 1982), 29-36.
4. Byrnes, Margaret. “Preservation of Library Materials: 1982,” Library Resources and Technical Services, 27(July/September 1983), 297-314.
5. Cohen, Ralph. “The Challenge From the Humanities," Minutes of the One Hundredth Meeting. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries, 1982, pp. 37-41.
6. Commission on the Humanities. The Humanities in American Life. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980.
7. Dorn, Knut. “A Changing Scene—German Publishing Moving into the 1980s,” ACRL Western European Specialists Section Newsletter, 6(January 1983), 4-18.
8. Dougherty, Richard M. “Preservation and Access: A Collision of Objectives.” Journal of Academic Librarianship, 8(September 1982), 199.
9. Frost, Carolyn O. “The Use of Citations in Literary Research: A Preliminary Classification of Citation Functions,” Library Quarterly, 49(October 1979), 399-414.
10. Garfield, Eugene. “Is Information Retrieval in the Arts and Humanities Inherently Different from that in Science? The Effect that ISI’s Citation Index for the Arts and Humanities is Expected to Have on Future Scholarship,” Library Quarterly, 50(January 1980), 40-57.
11. Gwinn, Nancy E. and Paul H. Mosher. “Coordinating Collection Development: The RLG Conspectus,” College and Research Libraries, 44(March 1983), 128-139.
12. Koenig, Michael E. D. “Citation Analysis for the Arts and Humanities as a Collection Management Tool," Collection Management, 2(Fall 1978), 247-261.
13. Lancaster, F. W. “Evaluating Collections by their Use,” Collection Management, 4(Spring/Summer 1982), 15-43.
14. Lehman, David, Sandra Gary, and Don Shirley. “In Praise of the Independent," Newsweek (July 25, 1983), 71-72B.
15. Osburn, Charles B. Academic Research and Library Resources: Changing Patterns in America. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press, 1979.
16. Stern, Madeline. "Characteristics of the Literature of Literary Scholarship,” College and Research Libraries, 44(July 1983), 199-209.
17. Stone, Sue, "Progress in Documentation, Humanities Scholars: Information Needs and Uses,” Journal of Documentation, 38(December 1982), 292-313.
18. Weintraub, Karl J. “The Humanistic Scholar and the Library,” Library Quarterly, 50 (January 1980), 22-39.
19. Wclsch, Erwin K. “European Collection Development in American Libraries: Problems and Prospects," Acquisition of Foreign Materials for U.S. Libraries, 2nd ed., compiled and edited by Theodore Samore. Metuchen, New Jersey: Scarecrow Press, Inc., 1982, pp. 125-141.