Construction after construction and its theoretical challenges

Language

Volumn 84, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 8-28

  Jackendoff, Ray ^a  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 52649174309     PISSN: 00978507     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/lan.2008.0058     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. BECK, SIGRID, and ARNIM VON STECHOW. 2006. Dog after dog revisited. Tübingen: University of Tübingen, MS.
2. CULICOVER, PETER W. 1999. Syntactic nuts: Hard cases in syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. CULICOVER, PETER W., and RAY JACKENDOFF. 2005. Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. FILLMORE, CHARLES; PAUL KAY; and MARY CATHERINE O'CONNOR. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language 64.501-39.
5. GHOMESHI, JILA; RAY JACKENDOFF; NICOLE ROSEN; and KEVIN RUSSELL. 2004. Contrastive focus reduplication in English (The salad-salad paper). Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22.307-57.
6. GOLDBERG, ADELE. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. GOLDBERG, ADELE. 2006. Constructions at work: Constructionist approaches in context. New York: Oxford University Press.
8. GOLDBERG, ADELE, and RAY JACKENDOFF. 2004. The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language 80.532-68.
9. HORN, LAWRENCE. 1993. Economy and redundancy in a dualistic model of natural language. SKY 1993: Yearbook of the Linguistic Association of Finland, ed. by Susanna Shore and Maria Vilkuna, 31-72. Turku: The Linguistic Association of Finland.
10. HUDDLESTON, RODNEY, and GEOFFREY K. PULLUM. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. JACKENDOFF, RAY. 1977. X′-syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
12. JACKENDOFF, RAY. 2002. Foundations of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. KÖNIG, EKKEHARD, and CLAIRE MOYSE-FAURIE. 2007. Spatial reciprocity: Between grammar and lexis. Berlin: Free University Berlin, MS.
14. LANGACKER, RONALD. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
15. MATSUYAMA, TETSUYA. 2004. The N after N construction: A constructional idiom. English Linguistics 21.55-84.
16. OEHRLE, RICHARD. 1998. Noun after noun. Paper delivered at the annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, New York City, January 1998.
17. PI, CHIA-YI TONY. 1995. The structure of English iteratives. Proceedings of the 1995 annual conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association (Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics), ed. by Päivi Koskinen, 434-45.
18. POSTMA, GERTJAN. 1995. Zero-semantics: The syntactic encoding of quantificational meaning. Linguistics in the Netherlands 1995, ed. by Marcel den Dikken and Kees Hengeveld, 175-90. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
19. PULLUM, GEOFFREY K. 1991. English nominal gerund phrases as noun phrases with verb phrase heads. Linguistics 29.763-99.
20. SAG, IVAN; TOM WASOW; and EMILY BENDER. 2003. Syntactic theory: A formal introduction. 2nd edn. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
21. SUBRAMANIAN, UMA M. 1992. On internal and external syntax mismatches. Columbus: The Ohio State University dissertation.
22. WILLIAMS, EDWIN. 1994. Remarks on lexical knowledge. The acquisition of the lexicon, ed. by Lila Gleitman and Barbara Landau, 7-34. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.