Ethical considerations for teachers in the evaluation of other teachers

Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 317-324

  Peterson, Kenneth D ^a   Kelly, Phillip ^b   Caskey, Micki ^a  

^a PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 52649170438     PISSN: 0920525X     EISSN: 15730425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1021752209823     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Capie, W., Anderson, S.J., Johnson, C.E., & Ellett, C.D. (1980). Teacher Performance Assessment Instruments: Teaching Plans and Materials, Interpersonal Skills, Student Perceptions. Athens, Georgia: College of Education, University of Georgia, Georgia Department of Education.
2. Cooper, M. (1988). Whose Culture is it Anyway? In A. Lieberman (Ed.), Building a Professional Culture in Schools (pp. 45-54). NY: Teachers College Press.
3. Darling-Hammond, L. (1985). Valuing Teachers: The Making of a Profession. Teachers College Record, 87(2), 205-218.
4. Darling-Hammond, L. (1988). Policy and Professionalism. In A. Lieberman (Ed.), Building a professional culture in schools (pp. 55-77). NY: Teachers College Press.
5. Darling-Hammond, L. (1989). Teacher Professionalism and Accountability. Education Digest, 55(1), 15-19.
6. Ellett, C.D. (2000). Professional Assessment and Comprehensive Evaluation System (PACES) Teaching and Learning Professional Growth Manual. Watkinsville, GA: CDE Research Associates, Inc.
7. Ellett, C.D., Loup, K.S., & Chauvin, S.W. (1990). System for Teaching and learning Assessment and Review (STAR). Baton Rouge, LA: College of Education, Louisiana State University, Louisiana Department of Education.
8. Etzioni, A. (1969). The Semi-professions and Their Organization. NY: Free Press.
9. Ewing, A.C. (1953). Ethics. NY: MacMillan.
10. Herfling, E. (1999). Peer Review of Teachers. ERIC Digest Number 126. ERIC Document ED 429 343. Eugene, OR: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management.
11. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (1988). The personnel evaluation standards. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
12. Kelly, P.P. (1998). A Comparative Analysis of Teacher Review Programs in Four Urban Districts: Professional Unionism in Action. Paper presented at the 1998 American Educational Research Association Annual meeting, San Diego, CA.
13. Kerchner, C.T., Koppich, J.E., & Weeres, J.G. (1997). United Mind Workers: Unions and Teaching in the Knowledge Society. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
14. McCarthey, S.J., & Peterson, K.D. (1987). Peer Review of Materials in Public School Teacher Evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1(3), 285-293.
15. National Educational Association (1975). Code of Ethics of the Education Profession. Washington, D.C: National Educational Association.
16. Peterson, K., & Mitchell, A. (1985). Teacher Controlled Evaluation in a Career Ladder Program. Educational Leadership, 43(3), 44-49.
17. Peterson, K.D. (1988). Reliability of Panel Judgments for Promotion in a School Teacher Career Ladder System. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 21(4), 95-99.
18. Peterson, K.D. (2000). Teacher Evaluation: A Comprehensive Guide to New Directions and Practices (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
19. Sparks, D. (2000). A Staff Development Code of Ethics. Journal of Staff Development, 21(2), 48-51.
20. Strike, K.A. (1990). The Ethics of Educational Evaluation. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds), The New Handbook of Teacher Evaluation: Assessing Elementary and Secondary School Teachers (pp. 356-373). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21. Strike, K., & Bull, B. (1981). Fairness and the Legal Context of Teacher Evaluation. In J. Millman (Ed.), Handbook of Teacher Evaluation (pp. 301-343). Beverly Hills: Sage.
22. Stufflebeam, D.L., & Pullin, D. (1998). Achieving Legal Validity in Personnel Evaluations. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11, 215-230.