The SBR process: An efficient and economical solution for depollution of the effluent produced by the gaseous drinks company of north-FEZ (Morocco);Le procédé RSD: Une solution efficace et économique pour dépolluer les effluents de la Compagnie des boissons gazeuses du nord de Fès (Maroc)

Journal Europeen d'Hydrologie

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 181-198

  Faouzi, Mouna ^a   Merzouki, Mohamed ^a   El Fadel, Hanane ^a   Benlemlih, Mohamed ^a  

^a SIDI MOHAMED BEN ABDELLAH UNIVERSITY   (Morocco)

Author keywords

Agribusiness effluents; Biological treatment optimization; Sequencing batch reactor; Standards of rejection

Indexed keywords

BATCH REACTORS; EFFLUENT TREATMENT; OPTIMIZATION; PURIFICATION;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE; ECONOMIC IMPACT; EFFLUENT; OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; POLLUTION CONTROL; VENTILATION; WASTE TREATMENT;

AFRICA; MOROCCO; NORTH AFRICA;

EID: 52649165607     PISSN: 10236368     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bahij J., Soudi B. (2003). Réutilisation des eaux usées épurées en agriculture aux Maroc : Bilan de plusieurs années de recherche. Optimisation, valorisation et durabilité. Séminaire international. Tunis, 24-25 Septembre 2003.
2. Casellas M., Dagot C., Baudu M., (2002). Stratégies d'élimination de l'azote d'un effluent urbain dans un réacteur discontinu séquentiel (SBR). Revue des sciences de l'eau, 15, 749-765.
3. Čech J.S., Hartman P. et Macek M. (1993). Bacteria and protozoa population dynamics in biological phosphate removal systems. In: Proceeding of the first international specialised conference on Microorganisms in activated sludge and biofilm processes, Paris, 109-117.
4. Christensen M.H. Harremoës P. (1978). Nitrification and denitrification in wastewater treatment. Water pollution microbiology, 2, 391-394.
5. Duhamel B., (1998). Les bactéries filamenteuses dans le traitement par boues activées. ENGREF. Rapport, 12 p.
6. Edeline F. (1993). L'épuration biologique des eaux : théorie et technologie des réacteurs. Cebedoc, Laroisier, 303 p.
7. Hegg D., Cohen T., Song Q., Kasabov N. (1999) Intelligent Control of Sequencing Batch Reactors (SBRs) for Biological Nitrogen Removal. In: N. Kasalov and K. Ko (eds), Emerging knowledge and connectionnist-based systems, p. 152-155.
8. Irvine F., Manning B.A., Horan N.J., (1997). Biological wastewater treatment systems, theory and operation, John Wiley.
9. Jang A. et al. (2003). Characterization and evaluation of aerobic granules in sequencing batch reactor. Journal of biotechnology, 105, 71-82.
10. Lefebvre O. et al. (2005). Halophilic biological treatment of tannery soak liquor in a sequencing batch reactor. Water research, 39, 1471-1480.
11. Liu W.T., Mino., Nakamura K. et Matsuo T. (1994). Role of glycogen in acetate uptake and polyhydroxyalkanoate synthesis in anaerobic-aerobic activated sludge with a minimized polyphosphate content. Journal of Fermentation Biotechnology. 77, 535-540.
12. Merzouki M. et al. (1999). Polyphosphate accumulating and denitrifying bacteria isolated from anaerobic-anoxic and anaerobic-aerobic sequencing batch reactors. Current Microbiology. 38, pp. 9-17.
13. Merzouki M. et al. (2001). Effect of operating parameters on anoxic biological phosphorus removal in anaerobic anoxic sequencing batch reactor. Environmental Technology. 22, pp. 397-408.
14. Merzouki M., Bernet N., Delgenes J.P., Benlemlih M. (2003). Phosphorus and nitrogen removal in an anaerobic anoxic sequencing batch reactor combined with a fixed-bed nitrification reactor. (Revue JMCE Journal of Catalytic Materials and Environment). 1, pp. 43-50.
15. Merzouki M. et al. (2005). Effect of prefermentation on denitrifying phosphorus removal in slaughterhouse wastewater. Bioressource Technology. 96, pp. 1317-1322.
16. Merzouki M. et al. (2006). Déphosphatation biologique des eaux usées en condition anoxique dans un réacteur séquentiel discontinu. European Journal of Water Quality. 37, pp. 109-117.
17. rd ed.). McGraw-Hill Book company, 1334 p.
18. OMS (Organisation Mondiale de la Santé) (1989). Série de rapports techniques No. 778. L'utilisation des eaux usées en agriculture et en aquiculture : recommandations à visées sanitaires. Genève, 74 p.
19. e Congrès Mondial des Ressources en Eau,13 -18 mai 1991, Rabat, Maroc, pp. 21-26.
20. e édition. Dunod, 1383 p.
21. Schwarzenbek N., Borges P.A., Wilderer JM (2004) Treatment of dairy effluents in an aerobic granular sludge sequencing batch reactor. Appl. Microbiol. biotechnol. 66, 711-718
22. Stratton H. (2000) The role of bacterial cell surface hydrophobicity in biological foams, The ASP, Issue No. 1.
23. Third K.A., Gibbs B., Newland M., Cord-Ruwisch R. (2005) Long-term aeration management for improved N-removal via SND in a sequencing batch reactor. Water Research 39, 3523-3530.
24. Tijhuis, L., Van Benthum, W.A.J., Van Loosdrecht, M.C.M, Heijnen, J.J., 1994. Solids retention time in spherical biofilms in a biofilm airlift suspension reactor. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 44, 867-879.
25. Torrijos M., Moletta R. (1997) Winery wastewater depollution by sequencing batch reactor. Water Science and Technology, 35, 2497.
26. Torrijos M., Vuitton V., Moletta R. (2001). The SBR process : an efficient and economic solution for the treatment of wastewater at small cheesemaking dairies in the Jura mountains. Water science and technology, 43, 373-380.
27. Tsuneda S., Ohno T., Soejima K., Hirata A (2005). Simultaneous nitrogen and phosphorus removal using denitrifying phosphate-accumulating organisms in a sequencing Batch reactor, Biochemical Engineering Journal 27, 191-196.