Geoarchaeological prospection of a medieval manor in the Dutch polders using an electromagnetic induction sensor in combination with soil augerings

Geoarchaeology

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 305-319

  Simpson, David ^a   Lehouck, Alexander ^a,b   Van Meirvenne, Marc ^a   Bourgeois, Jean ^a   Thoen, Erik ^a   Vervloet, Jelier ^b  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARCHAEOLOGY; ELECTROMAGNETIC METHOD; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; MEDIEVAL; SENSOR; SOIL ANALYSIS;

EID: 52649119015     PISSN: 08836353     EISSN: 15206548     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/gea.20214     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Benech, C., & Marmet, E. (1999). Optimum depth of investigation and conductivity response rejection of the different electromagnetic devices measuring apparent magnetic susceptibility. Archaeological Prospection, 6, 31-45.
2. Brus, D.J. (1987). Geomorfologische kaart van Nederland 1:50 000. Toelichting op het kaartblad Zeeuws-Vlaanderen. Haarlem, NL: University of Wageningen and Rijks Geologische Dienst.
3. Clark, A. (1990). Seeing beneath the soil. Prospecting methods in archaeology. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
4. Dalan, R.A. (2006). A geophysical approach to buried site detection using down-hole susceptibility and soil magnetic techniques. Archaeological Prospection, 13, 182-206.
5. de Bakker, H., & Schelling, J. (1989). Systeem van bodemclassificatie voor Nederland. Wageningen: University of Wageningen.
6. De Mulder, E.J., Geluk, M.C., Ritsema, I., Westerhoff, W.E., & Wong, T.E. (2003). De ondergrond van Nederland. Geologie van Nederland 7, Utrecht, NL: Nederlands Instituut voor Toegepaste Geowetenschappen TNO.
7. Desvignes, G., & Tabbagh, A. (1995). Simultaneous interpretation of magnetic and electromagnetic prospecting for characterization of magnetic features. Archaeological Prospection, 2, 129-139.
8. Geonics (1998). Application of "dipole-dipole" electromagnetic systems for geological depth sounding. Technical Note TN-31. Ontario, Canada: Geonics Ltd.
9. Gottschalk, M.K.E. (1955). Historische geografie van Westelijk Zeeuws Vlaanderen. Deel I. Tot de St-Elisabethsvloed van 1404. Assen, NL: Van Gorcum.
10. Hill, I., Grossey, T., & Leech, C. (2004). High resolution multisensor geophysical surveys for near-surface applications can be rapid and cost effective. The Leading Edge, 23, 684-688.
11. Kvamme, KL. (2006). Integrating multidimensional geophysical data. Archaeological Prospection, 13, 57-72.
12. Linford, N. (1998). Geophysical survey at Boden Vean, Cornwall, including an assessment of the microgravity technique for the location of suspected archaeological void features. Archaeometry, 40, 187-216.
13. Lück, E., & Eisenreich, M. (1999). Geophysical prospection of archaeological sites in Brandenburg, Germany. Archaeological Prospection, 6, 125-133.
14. Lück, E., Ruhlmann, J., & Spangenberg, U. (2005). Physical background of soil EC mapping: Laboratory, theoretical and field studies. In J. Stafford (Ed.), Precision agriculture 2005 (pp. 417-424). Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.
15. Maillol, J.M., Ciobotaru, D.L., & Moravetz, I. (2004). Electrical and magnetic response of archaeological features at the early Neolithic site of Movila lui Deciov, Western Romania. Archaeological Prospection, 11, 213-226.
16. McNeill, J.D. (1980). Electrical conductivity of soils and rocks. Technical Note TN-5. Ontario, Canada: Geonics Ltd.
17. Ovaa, I. (1957). De bodemgesteldheid van Westelijk Zeeuws-Vlaanderen. Stiboka Rapport 455. Wageningen, NL: University of Wageningen.
18. Rabbel, W., Stuempel, H., & Woelz, S. (2004). Archaeological prospection with magnetic and shear-wave surveys at the ancient city of Miletos (western Turkey). The Leading Edge, 7, 690-693.
19. Rapp, G., & Hill, L. (2006). Geoarchaeology. The earth science approach to archaeological interpretation (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20. Roskams, S. (2001). Excavation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21. Tabbagh, A. (1984). On the comparison between magnetic and electromagnetic prospection methods for magnetic feature detection. Archaeometry, 20, 171-182.
22. Tabbagh, A. (1990). Electromagnetic prospecting. In I. Scollar, A. Tabbagh, A. Hesse, & I. Herzog (Eds.), Archaeological prospection and remote sensing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. ten Cate, J.A.M., van Holst, A.F., Kleijer, H., & Stolp, J. (1995). Handleiding bodemgeografisch onderzoek. Richtlijnen en voorschriften. Deel A: Bodem. Technisch Document 19A. Wageningen, NL: University of Wageningen.
24. Van der Sluys, P., & Ovaa, I. (1967). Bodemkaart van Nederland, schaal 1:50 000. Toelichting bij de kaartbladen 53 Sluis en 54 West Terneuzen. Wageningen: University of Wageningen.
25. Vanslembrouck, N., Lehouck, A., & Thoen, E. (2005). Past landscapes and present-day techniques: Reconstructing submerged medieval landscapes in the western part of Sealand Flanders. Landscape History, 27, 51-64.
26. Venter, M.L., Thompson, V.D., Reynolds, M.D., & Waggoner, J.C. Jr. (2006). Integrating shallow geophysical survey: Archaeological investigations at Totógal in the Sierra de los Tuxtlas, Veracruz, México. Journal of Archaeological Science, 33, 767-777.
27. Vos, P.C., & van Heeringen, R.M. (1997). Holocene geology and occupation history of the Province of Zeeland. In M.M. Fischer (Ed.), Holocene evolution of Zeeland (SW Netherlands) (pp. 5-110). Haarlem, NL: Mededelingen Nederlands Instituut voor Toegepaste Geowetenschappen TNO 59.