A framework for temporal representation and reasoning in business intelligence applications

AAAI Spring Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn SS-08-O1, Issue , 2008, Pages 59-70

  Krieger, Hans Ulrich ^a   Kiefer, Bernd ^a   Declerck, Thierry ^a  

^a GERMAN RESEARCH CENTER FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DFKI   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA DESCRIPTION; INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION THEORY; PELLETIZING; PROTONS; SPRINGS (COMPONENTS);

BINARY RELATIONS; BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE; BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE APPLICATIONS; BUSINESS RULES; CONCEPT OF TIME; DESCRIPTION LOGIC; ONTOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE; PROCESS MANAGEMENT; TECHNICAL REPORTS; TEMPORAL INFORMATION; TIME SLICING; UNDER-SPECIFICATION;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 52649108138     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Allen, J. F. 1984. A general model of action and time. Artificial Intelligence 23(2): 123-154.
2. Baader, F., and Hanschke, P. 1991. A scheme for integrating concrete domains into concept languages. In Proceedings of 12th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 452-457.
3. Baader, F., and Sattler, U. 2001. An overview of tableau algorithms for description logics. Studia Logica 69:5-40.
4. Baader, F.; Calvanese, D.; McGuinness, D.; Nardi, D.; and Patel-Schneider, P. 2003. The Description Logic Handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Broekstra, J.; Kampman, A.; and van Harmelen, F. 2002. Sesame: A generic archistecture for storing and querying RDF and RDF schema. In Proceedings of the 1st International Semantic Web Conference, 54-68. Springer.
6. Declerck, T., and Krieger, H.-U. 2005. Translating XBRL into description logic. An approach using Protégé, Sesame & OWL. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Business Information Systems (BIS).
7. Genesereth, M. R. 1991. Knowledge interchange format. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, 238-249.
8. Haarslev, V., and Möller, R. 2001. Description of the RACER system and its applications. In Proceedings of the International Workshop in Description Logics, DL-2001, 131-141.
9. Hayes, P. 2004. RDF semantics. Technical report, W3C.
10. Hobbs, J. 2004. An OWL ontology of time. http://www.isi.edu/pan/time/owl- time-july04.txt.
11. Horrocks, I.; Patel-Schneider, P. F.; Boley, H.; Tabet, S.; Grosof, B.; and Dean, M. 2004. SWRL: A semantic web rule language combining OWL and RuleML. W3C Member Submission.
12. Kiryakov, A. 2006. OWLIM: balancing between scalable repository and light-weight reasoner. Developer's Track, WWW2006.
13. Kolovski, V.; Parsia, B.; and Sirin, E. 2006. Extending SHOIQ(D) tableaux with DL-safe rules: First results. In Proceedings International Workshop on Description Logic, DL-2006.
14. Lutz, C. 2004. Combining interval-based temporal reasoning with general TBoxes. Artificial Intelligence 152(2):235-274.
15. Manola, F., and Miller, E. 2004. RDF primer. Technical report, W3C. 10 February.
16. Masolo, C.; Borgo, S.; Gangemi, A.; Guarino, N.; Oltramari, A.; and Schneider, L. 2003. WonderWeb deliverable d17. the wonderweb library of foundational ontologies, preliminary report. Technical report, ISTC-CNR.
17. McCarthy, J., and Hayes, P. J. 1969. Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence. In Meltzer, B., and Michie, D., eds., Machine Intelligence 4. Edinburgh University Press. 463-502.
18. Motik, B., and Sattler, U. 2006. A comparison of reasoning techniques for querying large description logic ABoxes. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Reasoning, 227-241.
19. Motik, B.; Sattler, U.; and Studer, R. 2004. Query answering for OWL-DL with rules. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2004), 549-563.
20. Nebel, B., and Smolka, G. 1989. Representation and reasoning with attributive descriptions. Technical Report, IBM Germany.
21. O'Connor, M.; Knublauch, H.; Tu, S.; Grosof, B.; Dean, M.; Grosso, W.; and Musen, M. 2005. Supporting rule system interoperability on the semantic web with SWRL. In Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC).
22. Ontotext. 2007. SwiftOWLIM semantic repository for RDF(S) and OWL, ver. 2.9.0.
23. Pratt-Hartmann, I. 2005. From TimeML to TPL*. In Proceedings of the Dagstuhl Seminar Annotating, Extracting and Reasoning about Time and Events.
24. Prud'hommeaux, E., and Seaborne, A. 2007. SPARQL query language for RDF. Technical report, W3C. W3C Candidate Recommendation.
25. Pustejovsky, J.; Castaño, J.; Ingria, R.; Saurí, R.; Gaizauskas, R.; Setzer, A.; and Katz, G. 2003. TimeML: Robust specification of event and temporal expressions in text. In Fifth International Workshop on Computational Semantics, IWCS-5.
26. Racer Systems. 2005. RacerPro user's guide, version 1.9.
27. Reynolds, D. 2006. Jena rules tutorial. Jena User Conference.
28. Reynolds, D. 2007. Jena 2 inference support. Version 1.35.
29. Schmidt-Schauß, M. 1988. Subsumption in KL-ONE is Undecidable. Technical Report, Universität Kaiserslautern.
30. Shieber, S. M. 1986. An Introduction to Unification-Based Approaches to Grammar. CSLI Lecture Notes, Number 4. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
31. Sider, T. 2001. Four Dimensionalism. An Ontology of Persistence and Time. Oxford University Press.
32. Sirin, E.; Parsia, B.; Cuenca-Grau, B.; Kalyanpur, A.; and Katz, Y. 2007. Pellet: A practical OWL-DL reasoner. Journal of Web Semantics 5(2).
33. Smith, M. K.; Welty, C.; and McGuinness, D. L. 2004. OWL Web Ontology Language Guide. Technical report, W3C. 10 February, ter Horst, H. J. 2005. Combining RDF and part of OWL with rules: Semantics, decidability, complexity. In Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference, 668-684.
34. Welty, C.; Fikes, R.; and Makarios, S. 2005. A reusable ontology for fluents in OWL. Research Report RC23755, IBM.