Negative off-site impacts of ecological restoration: Understanding and addressing the conflict

Conservation Biology

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 1118-1124

  Buckley, Mark C ^a   Crone, Elizabeth E ^b  

^a ECONorthwest   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

Author keywords

Conflict; Ecosystem services; Externalities; Land use; Landowners; Restoration; Stakeholders

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; CONSERVATION PLANNING; ECOLOGICAL IMPACT; ENDANGERED SPECIES; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; HEALTH IMPACT; HUMAN ACTIVITY; LAND USE CHANGE; LAND USE CONFLICT; LANDOWNER; REGULATORY FRAMEWORK; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; RIPARIAN FOREST; STAKEHOLDER;

ECONOMICS; ECOSYSTEM; ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; METHODOLOGY; PUBLIC OPINION; REVIEW; SOCIOECONOMICS; UNITED STATES;

CALIFORNIA; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION; PUBLIC OPINION; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

CALIFORNIA; NORTH AMERICA; SACRAMENTO RIVER; SACRAMENTO RIVER CONSERVATION AREA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 52649085741     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: 15231739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01027.x     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Adams, R., and D. Gallo. 2001a. The economic impact on Butte County of anadromous fish restoration program actions on agricultural lands in the Butte Creek watershed. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Stockton, California.
2. Adams, R., and D. Gallo. 2001b. The impact on Glenn County property tax revenues of public land acquisitions in the Sacramento River Conservation Area. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Chico, California.
3. Alario, M. 2000. Urban and ecological planning in Chicago: science, policy and dissent. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 43 : 489 504.
4. Allan, D., D. Erickson, and J. Fay. 1997. The influence of catchment land use on stream integrity across multiple spatial scales. Freshwater Biology 37 : 149 161.
5. Allan, J., and L. Johnson. 1997. Catchment-scale analysis of aquatic ecosystems. Freshwater Biology 37 : 107 111.
6. Alpert, P., F. Griggs, and D. Peterson. 1999. Riparian forest restoration along large rivers: initial results from the Sacramento River Project. Restoration Ecology 7 : 360 368.
7. Armsworth, P., G. Daily, P. Kareiva, and J. Sanchirico. 2006. Land market feedbacks can undermine biodiversity conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103 : 5403 5408.
8. Buckley, M. 2004. Strategic restoration: game theory applied to the Sacramento River Conservation Area. Proceedings of the sixteenth international conference. Society for Ecological Restoration, Victoria, British Columbia.
9. Buckley, M., and B. Haddad. 2006. Socially strategic ecological restoration: a game-theoretic analysis. Environmental Management 38 : 48 61.
10. Carpenter, S., and K. Cottingham. 1997. Resilience and restoration of lakes. Conservation Ecology 1 : http://www.consecol.org/vol1/iss1/art2/.
11. Colding, J., J. Lundberg, and C. Folke. 2006. Incorporating green-area user groups in urban ecosystem management. AMBIO 35 : 237 244.
12. Conover, M. 1998. Perceptions of American agricultural producers about wildlife on their farms and ranches. Wildlife Society Bulletin 26 : 597 604.
13. Folke, C. 2006. The economic perspective: conservation against development versus conservation for development. Conservation Biology 20 : 686 688.
14. Folke, C., T. Hahn, P. Olsson, and J. Norberg. 2005. Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30 : 441 473.
15. Freilich, J., J. Emlen, J. Duda, D. Freeman, and P. Cafaro. 2003. Ecological effects of ranching: a six-point critique. BioScience 53 : 759 765.
16. Goudie, A. 1986. The human impact on the natural environment. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
17. Grimble, R., and K. Wellard. 1997. Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: a review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities. Agricultural Systems 55 : 173 193.
18. Hacking, H. 2006. Colusa on offensive against new restoration projects. Chico Enterprise-Record January 12 : http://www.chicoer.com/local_news/ ci_3394047.
19. Hanson, J., R. Dismukes, W. Chambers, C. Greene, and A. Kremen. 2004. Risk and risk management in organic agriculture: views of organic farmers. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 19 : 218 227.
20. Harding, J., E. Benfield, P. Bolstad, G. Helfman, and E. Jones. 1998. Stream biodiversity: the ghost of land use past. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 95 : 14843 14847.
21. Higgs, E. 1997. What is good ecological restoration Conservation Biology 11 : 338 348.
22. Holl, K., and E. Crone. 2004. Applicability of landscape and island biogeography theory to restoration of riparian understorey plants. Journal of Applied Ecology 41 : 922 933.
23. Jones, L. 2005. Colusa subreach planning project landowner survey. Institute for Social Research-California State University, Sacramento.
24. Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1979. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47 : 263 292.
25. Kahneman, D., J. Knetsch, and R. Thaler. 1991. The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias: anomalies. Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 : 193 206.
26. Kauffman, J. 2004. Death rides the forest: perceptions of fire, land use, and ecological restoration of western forests. Conservation Biology 18 : 878 882.
27. Knight, R., W. Walton, G. Meara, W. Reisen, and R. Wass. 2003. Strategies for effective mosquito control in constructed treatment wetlands. Ecological Engineering 21 : 211 232.
28. Kremen, C., et al. 2007. Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land use change. Ecology Letters 10 : 299 314.
29. Lamb, D., and D. Gilmour. 2003. Rehabilitation and restoration of degraded forest. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, United Kingdom.
30. McGinnis, M., J. Woolley, and J. Gamman. 1999. Bioregional conflict resolution: rebuilding community in watershed planning and organizing. Environmental Management 24 : 1 12.
31. Marshall, A. 1890. Principles of economics. Macmillan, London.
32. Martin, G. 2002. Tract backtracking; farmers wary of Sacramento River habitat plan. San Francisco Chronicle April 17 : A 17.
33. Marzluff, J., and K. Ewing. 2001. Restoration of fragmented landscapes for the conservation of birds: a general framework and specific recommendations for urbanizing landscapes. Restoration Ecology 9 : 280 292.
34. Marzluff, J., and M. Restani. 1999. The effects of forest fragmentation on avian nest predation. Pages 155 169 in J. Rochelle, L. Lehmann, and J. Wisniewski, editors. Forest fragmentation: wildlife and management implications. Brill Academic Publishing, Leiden, The Netherlands.
35. Merrill, T., D. Mattson, R. Wright, and H. Quigley. 1999. Defining landscapes suitable for restoration of grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) in Idaho. Biological Conservation 87 : 231 248.
36. Muthoo, A. 1999. Bargain theory with applications. Cambridge University Press, New York.
37. The Nature Conservancy (TNC). 2003. Tamarisk control in southern California. TNC, Arlington, Virginia. Available from http://tncweeds.ucdavis. edu/success/ca003.html (accessed February 2006).
38. Pease, J., M. Rankin, J. Verdon, and R. Reisz. 1997. Why landowners restore wetlands: a national survey. Iowa State University Extension, Ames.
39. Pfadenhauer, J. 2001. Some remarks on the socio-cultural background of restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 9 : 220 229.
40. Sacramento River Advisory Council (SRAC). 1998. Sacramento River Conservation Area handbook. Department of Water Resources, Sacramento, California.
41. Sanderson, E., J. Malanding, M. Levy, K. Redford, A. Wannebo, and G. Woolmer. 2002. The human footprint and the last of the wild. BioScience 52 : 891 904.
42. Schlosser, I. 1991. Stream fish ecology: a landscape perspective. BioScience 41 : 704 712.
43. Schultz, L., C. Folke, and P. Olsson. 2007. Enhancing ecosystem management through social-ecological inventories: lessons from Kristianstads Vattenrike, Sweden. Environmental Conservation 34 : 140 152.
44. Shields, F., J. C. Cooper, S. Knight, and M. Moore. 2003. Stream corridor restoration research: a long and winding road. Ecological Engineering 20 : 441 454.
45. Snyder, N., S. Mostaghimi, D. Berry, R. Reneau, S. Hong, P. McClellan, and E. Smith. 1998. Impact of riparian forest buffers on agricultural nonpoint source pollution. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 34 : 385 395.
46. Sponseller, R., E. Benfield, and H. Valett. 2001. Relationships between land use, spatial scale and stream macroinvertebrate communities. Freshwater Biology 46 : 1409 1424.
47. Willott, E. 2004. Restoring nature, without mosquitoes Restoration Ecology 12 : 147 153.
48. Wolf, K. 2002. Advancing wildlife restoration and compatible farming along the Sacramento River - final report. The Nature Conservancy, Chico, California.
49. Wondolleck, J., and S. Yaffee. 2000. Making collaboration work: lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Island Press, Washington, D.C.