Beyond the Durfee square: Enhancing the h-index to score total publication output

Scientometrics

Volumn 76, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 577-588

  Anderson, Thomas R ^a   Hankin, Robin K S ^a   Killworth, Peter D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 52549112369     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-2071-2     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Andrews, G. E. (1984), The Theory of Partitions. Cambridge University Press.
2. P. Ball 2005 Achievement index climbs the ranks Nature 448 737
3. P. D. Batista M. G. Campiteli O. Kinouchi A. S. Martinez 2006 Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? Scientometrics 68 179 189
4. L. Bornmann H.-D. Daniel 2005 Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? Scientometrics 65 391 392
5. B. Cronin L. Meho 2006 Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57 1275 1278
6. L. Egghe 2006 Theory and practise of the g-index Scientometrics 69 131 152
7. J. E. Hirsch 2005 An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102 16569 16572
8. C. Holden 2005 Random samples: Data point - Impact factor Science 309 1181
9. B. H. Jin 2006 H-index: an evaluation indicator proposed by scientist Science Focus 1 8 9
10. R. N. Kostoff 2007 The difference between highly and poorly cited medical articles in the journal Lancet Scientometrics 72 513 520
11. L. Liang 2006 H-index sequence and h-index matrix: Constructions and applications Scientometrics 69 153 159
12. C. Oppenheim 2007 Using the h-index to rank influential British researchers in information science and librarianship Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58 297 301
13. T. Opthof 1997 Sense and nonsense about the impact factor Cardiovascular Research 33 1 7
14. T. Opthof R. Coronel H. M. Piper 2004 Impact factors: no totum pro parte by skewness of citation Cardiovascular Research 61 201 203
15. S. Redner 2005 Citation statistics from 110 years of Physical Review Physics Today 58 49 54
16. S. Saha S. Saint D. A. Christakis 2003 Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality? Journal of the Medical Library Association 91 42 46
17. M. Schreiber 2007 Self-citation corrections for the Hirsch index Europhysics Letters 78 1 6
18. P. O. Seglen 1992 The skewness of science Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 43 628 638
19. A. J. F. van Raan 2004 Sleeping beauties in science Scientometrics 59 467 472
20. J. K. Vanclay 2007 On the robustness of the h-index Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58 1547 1550
21. P. Vinkler 2007 Eminence of scientists in the light of the h-index and other scientometric indicators Journal of Information Science 33 481 491