Procedures for evaluating the impact of complex educational interventions

Journal of Science Education and Technology

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 17-30

  Venezky, Richard L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Mapping; School reform; Technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 52549112167     PISSN: 10590145     EISSN: 15731839     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1016664426024     Document Type: Review

References (8)

1. Achen, C. H. (1986). The Statistical Analysis of Quasi-Experiments, University of California Press, Berkeley.
2. Campbell, D. T., and Stanley, J. C. (1971). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Design for Research, Rand McNally, Chicago.
3. Hativa, N. (1988). Computer-based drill and practice in arithmetic: Widening the gap between high- and low-achieving students. American Educational Research Journal 25: 366-397.
4. McLaughlin, M. W. (1989). The RAND Change Agent Study Ten Years Later: Macro Perspectives and Micro Realities, Center for Research on the Context of Secondary School Teaching, Stanford University.
5. McLaughlin, M. W., and Phillips, D. C. (Eds.). (1991). Evaluation and Education: At Quarter Century (Ninetieth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education), Distributed by the University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
6. Mosteller, F., Light, R. J., and Sachs, J. A. (1996). Sustained inquiry in education. Lessons from skill grouping and classs size. Harvard Educational Review 66: 797-842.
7. Wholey, J. S. (1979). Evaluation - Promise and Performance, Urban Institute, Washington, DC.
8. Yin, R. K. (1993). Applications of Case Study Research, Sage, Newbury Park, California.