Using influence diagrams to aid the management of software change

Requirements Engineering

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 173-182

  Burgess, Colin J ^a   Dattani, Ilesh ^c   Hughes, Gordon ^c   May, John H R ^a   Rees, Kearton ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b MARTLESHAM HEATH   (United Kingdom)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Influence diagrams; Risk based modelling; Software change

Indexed keywords

EID: 52549092442     PISSN: 09473602     EISSN: 1432010X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/PL00010358     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. May IHR, Hall P, Zhu H, Cockram T, Bird N, Winsborrow L. Fault prediction for software development processes. In: Proceedings of IMA Conference on the Mathematics of Dependable Systems. Royal Holloway, University of London, 1993, pp 165-181
2. Fenton N, Neil M. Software metrics and risk. In: Proceedings of the Second European Software Measurement Conference (FESMA99). TI-KVIV, Amsterdam, 1999
3. Fenton N, Neil M. Software metrics roadmap. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE2000). Limerick, Ireland, 2000
4. Burgess CJ, Dattani I, Hughes G, May JHR, Rees K. Using influence diagrams in software change management. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Software Quality Management (SQM99). BCS, London, 1999, pp 177-189
5. Pearl J. Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1988
6. Shachter RD. Evaluating influence diagrams. Operations Res 1986;34:871-882
7. Shachter RD. Probabilistic inference and influence diagrams. Operations Res 1988;36:589-604
8. Boesch FT (ed.). Special issue on influence diagrams. Networks 1990;20:491-685
9. Marshall KT, Oliver RM. Decision making. Forecasting: with emphasis on model building and policy analysis. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1995
10. De Braganca Pereira CA. Barlow RE. Medical diagnosis using influence diagrams. Networks 1990;20:565-578
11. Owens DK, Nease RF, Shachter RD. Representation and analysis of medical decision problems with influence diagrams. Report no. SMI-96-0643. Stanford University, 1996
12. Agosta JM. Constraining influence diagram structure by generative planning: an application to the optimisation of oil spill response. In: Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann, Man Mateo, CA, 1996 11-19
13. Malcolm Gill A. Fire and biodiversity: the effects and effectiveness of fire management. Biodiversity Series: Paper no. 9. Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research, Canberra, Australia, 1994
14. HUGIN Runtime users guide version 3.1, Rev. 2.4. Hugin Expert AS, Aalborg, Denmark, 1993. Web site: http://www.hugin.dk/
15. Fenton N, Neil M, Nielsen L. Building large-scale Bayesian networks. Technical report: Risk assessment. Decision Analysis Research Group, Computer Science Department, Queen Mary and Westfield College. University of London. Agena Ltd, London, 1999