Six leadership models for professional development in science and mathematics

Journal of Science Teacher Education

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 247-268

  Wallace, Josephine D ^a   Nesbit, Catherine R ^a   Miller, Anne Courtney S ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

^b University of North Carolina ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 52549083802     PISSN: 1046560X     EISSN: 15731847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1009451517934     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Acquarelli, K., & Mumme, J. (1996, March). A renaissance in mathematics education reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 478-484.
2. Anderson, R. D., & Mitchner, C. P. (1994). Research on science teacher education. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.) Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning (pp. 3-37). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
3. Barth, R. S. (1986). The principal and the profession of teaching. The Elementary School Journal, 4, 471-492.
4. Carey, N., Frechtling, J., & Westat, Inc. (1997). Best practice in action: Followup survey on teacher enhancement programs. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
5. Cook, C. (1994). Facilitating systemic change in mathematics and science education: A leadership project for professional development providers: A project of the North Central Regional Educational Research Lab and the Midwest Consortium for Mathematics and Science Education. Oak Brook, IL.
6. Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1995, April). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(8), 597-604.
7. Dawson, J. A. (1984). The principal's role in facilitating teacher participation: Mediating the influence of school context. Philadelphia, PA: Research for Better Schools.
8. Devaney, K. (1987). The lead teacher: Ways to begin. New York: Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy.
9. Dilworth, M. E., & Imig, D. G. (1995). Professional teacher development. The ERIC Review, 3(3), 5-11.
10. Faraji, H. (1998, April). Science teachers' learning in a collaborative context of professional development. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Diego, CA.
11. Franklin, M. E. (1990). University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Mathematics and Science Education Network; Elementary school science and mathematics program assessment. Chapel Hill, NC.
12. Franklin, M. E. (1993). Stateside improvement in elementary mathematics and science education through peer training (Final Report of Project R168D00258-929). Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Mathematics and Science Education Network.
13. Frechtling, J., Sharp, L., Carey, N., Vaden-Kiernan, N., & Westat, Inc. (1995). Teacher enhancement programs: A perspective on the last four decades. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
14. Frechtling, J., & Westat, Inc. (1997, December). Best practice in action: Final report of the multi-agency study of teacher-enhancement programs. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
15. Fullan, M. (1993). Change Forces. New York: Falmer Press.
16. Fullan, M. G. (1996, February). Turning systemic thinking on its head. Phi Delta Kappan, 420-423.
17. Fullan, M., & Miles, M. B. (1992). Getting reform right: What works and what doesn't. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(10), 745-752.
18. Gehrke, N. (1991). Developing teachers' leadership skills. ERIC Digest. Washington: DC. Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
19. Graebill, L., & Phillips, E. (1990). A summer math institute for elementary teachers: Development, implementation, and follow-up. School Science and Mathematics, 2, 134-141.
20. Guskey, T. R. (1994). Results-oriented professional development: In search of an optimal mix of effective practices. Journal of Staff Development, 15(4), 42-49.
21. Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (1987). Change in schools: Facilitating the process. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
22. Harty, H., & Enochs, L. (1985). Toward reshaping the inservice education of science teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 2, 125-135.
23. Hatch, T. (1998). The differences in theory that matter in the practice of school improvement. American Educational Research Journal, 35 (1), 3-31.
24. Howe, A. C., & Stubbs, H. S. (1997). Empowering science teachers: A model for professional development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 8 (3), 167-182.
25. Lieberman, A., & Miller, L. (1990). Teacher development in professional practice schools. Teachers College Record, 92(1), 105-122.
26. Lieberman, A., Saxl, E., & Miles, M. (1988). Teacher leadership: Ideology and practice. In A. Lieberman (ed.) Building a Professional Culture in Schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
27. Little, J. W. (1993). Teachers' professional development in a climate of education reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), 129-151.
28. Loucks-Horsley, S. (1997). Teacher change, staff development, and systemic change: Reflections from the eye of a paradigm shift. In S. W. Friel and G. W. Bright (Eds.) Reflecting on our work, NSF teacher enhancement in K-6 mathematics (pp. 133-149). Lanham, Maryland: University Press of America, Inc.
29. Loucks-Horsley, S. (1998). The role of teaching and learning in systemic reform: A focus on professional development. Science Educator, 7 (1), pp. 1-6.
30. Manthei, J. (1992, April). The mentor teacher as leader: The motives, characteristics and needs of seventy-three experienced teachers who seek a new leadership role. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco, CA:.
31. Martin, J., Green, J., & Palaich, R. (1986). Making teachers partners in reform. Teaching in America: The possible renaissance. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
32. Mathematics and Science Education Network (MSEN). (1993). FIRST Project interview protocol. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
33. Miller, A.-C., Wallace, J. D., & Nesbit, C. R. (1997). Design of professional development for science and mathematics teacher leaders and resulting implementation in the schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
34. Nesbit, C. R., Wallace, J. D., & Miller, A.-C. (1995, April). A comparison of program coordinators' leadership models in science and mathematics and lead teachers implementation of those leadership roles in the schools: Is there a match? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco, CA.
35. North Central Regional Educational Laboratory (NCREL). (1994). Professional development: Changing times. Policy Briefs. Report 4.
36. Northwest EQUALS, (1989). Family Science. Portland, OR.
37. Parkay, F. W., & Stanford, B. H. (1992). Becoming a teacher. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
38. Pellicer, L. O., & Anderson, L. O. (1995). A handbook for teacher leaders. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
39. Penta, M. Q., Mitchell, J. W., & Franklin, M. E. (1993, January). Reliability studies of a needs assessment instrument for elementary school mathematics and science programs in North Carolina. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the North Carolina Association for Research in Education, Greensboro, NC.
40. Price, E. C. (1990, August). Enhancing the professionalization of teachers through effective leadership training. Paper presented at the summer workshop of the Association of Teacher Educators. Baltimore: MD.
41. Project Wild. (1987). Aquatic and Terrestrial Activity Guides. Western Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies and the Western Regional Environmental Education Council.
42. Ruskus, J., & Luczak, J., & SRI International. (1995, November). Best practice in action: A descriptive analysis of exemplary teacher enhancement institutes in science and technology. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
43. Smylie, M. A. (1992). Teacher participation in school decision making: Assessing willingness to participate. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(1), 53-67.
44. Sparks, D. (1994). A paradigm shift in staff development. Journal of Staff Development, 15(4), 26-29.
45. Sparks, G. M. (1983). Synthesis of research on staff development for effective teaching. Educational Leadership, 52, 65-72.
46. Sparks, D., & Loucks-Horsley, S. (1989). Five models of staff development for teachers. Journal of Staff Development, 10 (4), 40-57.
47. Sparks, D., & Loucks-Horsley, S. (1990). Models of staff development. In W. R. Houston, M. Haberman, & J. Sikula (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Teacher Education (pp. 234-250). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
48. Vaughan, J. C. (1995). OERI launches professional development initiatives. The ERIC Review, 3 (3), 18-19.
49. Westat, Inc., National Center for Improving Science Education, & SRI International. (1996, August). Best practice inaction: Case stories. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation, Directorate for Education and Human Resources.
50. Zinn, L. F. (1997, March). Supports and barriers to teacher leadership: Reports of teacher leaders. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.