Towards a semantic framework for business activity monitoring and management

AAAI Spring Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn SS-08-O1, Issue , 2008, Pages 17-27

  Costello, Claire ^a   Molloy, Owen ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SERVICES; INFORMATION THEORY; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; MARKUP LANGUAGES; SEMANTICS; SPRINGS (COMPONENTS); STATISTICAL METHODS; WORK SIMPLIFICATION;

BUSINESS ACTIVITY MONITORING; BUSINESS RULES; CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT; DISTRIBUTED PROCESSING; EVENT-BASED MODELING; GENERIC FRAMEWORKS; PERFORMANCE METRICS; PROCESS MANAGEMENT; PROCESS METRICS; PROCESS MODELLING; PROCESS PERFORMANCE; REAL-TIME PERFORMANCE; SEMANTIC FRAMEWORK; SEMANTIC TECHNOLOGIES; SIX SIGMA QUALITY; TECHNICAL REPORTS; TRACEABILITY INFORMATION; WEB SERVICES;

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT;

EID: 52449128491     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Adams, C. W.; Gupta, P.; and Wilson, C. E. 2003. Six Sigma Deployment. Butterworth Heinmann of Elsevier Science.
2. DeFee, J. M. 2004. Business Activity Monitoring and Simulation. Electronically accessible: http://www.bptrends.com.
3. Golfarelli, M.; Rizzi, S.; and Cella, I. 2004. Beyond Data Warehousing: What's Next in Business Intelligence. In 7th ACM International Workshop on Data Warehousing and OLAP, 1-6.
4. Hackathorn, R. 2002. Current Practices in Active Data Warehousing. Retrieved 14th September 2006 from http://www.bolder.com/pubs/NCR200211-ADW.pdf.
5. Haller, A., and Oren, E. 2006. A process ontology to represent semantics of different process and choreography metamodels. Electronically accessible: http://www.m3pe.org/deliverables/process-ontology.pdf.
6. Horrocks, I.; Patel-Schneider, P. F.; Boley, H.; Tabet, S.; Grosof, B.; and Dean, M. 2004. SWRL: A Semantic Web Rule Language Combining OWL and RuleML. Electronically accessible: http://www.w3.org/Submission/SWRL/.
7. Jang, M., and Sohn, J.-C. 2004. Bossam: An Extended Rule Engine for OWL Inferencing. In Rules and Rule Markup Languages for the Semantic Web. Third International Workshop, RuleML 2004, volume LNCS 3324/2004, 128-138. Hiroshima, Japan: Springer, Berlin.
8. Jeng, J.; Flaxer, D.; and Kapoor, S. 2004. RuIeBAM: A Rule-Based Framework for Business Activity Management. In SCC '04: Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing, 262-270. Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society.
9. Junginger, S.; Kuhn, H.; and Bayer, F. 2004. Workflow-based Business Monitoring. WfMC Workflow Handbook 2004.
10. Kapoor, S.; Bhattacharya, K.; Buckley, S.; Chowdhary, P.; Ettl, M.; Katircioglu, K.; E.Mauch; and Phillips, L. 2005. A Technical Framework for Sense-and-Respond Business Management. IBM Systems Journal Vol. 44(No. 1):5-24.
11. Knifsend, F., and Debb, J. 2005. Using BAM to Empower the Organization: Unifying Events and Processes. Business Integration Journal 27-29.
12. Luckham, D. 2002. The Power of Events. Pearson Eduction Inc., Addison-Wesley, chapter Events, Timings and Causality, 87-112.
13. McGregor, C.; Schiefer, J.; and zur Muehlen, M. 2006. A Shareable Web Service Based Intelligent Descision Support System for On-Demand Business Process Management. International Journal of Business Process Integration and Management Vol. 1 (Issue 3).
14. McGregor, C. 2002. WfMC Workflow Handbook 2002. Future Strategies Inc., Lighthouse Point, Florida, chapter The Impact of Business Performance Monitoring on WfMC Standards.
15. Melchert, F.; Winter, R.; and Klesse, M. 2004. Aligning Process Automation and Business Intelligence to Support Corporate Performance Management. In The 10th Americas Conference on Information Systems.
16. Mendling, J., and Neumann, G. 2005. WfMC Workflow Handbook 2005. Future Strategies Inc., Lighthouse Point, Florida, chapter A Comparison of XML Interchange Formats for Business Process Modelling, 185-198.
17. Morris, H.; Vesset, D.; and Fleming, M. 2007. Improving Business Performance Through Process Visibility. Whitepaper, IDC.
18. Nesamoney, D. 2004. BAM: Event-driven Business Intelligence for the Real-Time Enterprise. DM Review 14(3):38-40.
19. RuleML. 2000. The Rule Markup Initiative (RuleML). Online. Electronically accessible: http://www.ruleml.org/.
20. Sheina, M. 2005. BI and Business Process Convergence. Computer Business Review Online. Electronically accessible: http://www.cbronline.com.
21. Thomas, M.; Redmond, R.; Yoon, V.; and Singh, R. 2005. A semantic approach to monitor business process. Communications of the ACM 48(12):55-59.
22. van der Aalst, W. M. 2003. Workflow Patterns. Distributed and Parallel Databases 13(7):5-51.
23. W3C. 2004. Owl web ontology language overview. Online. Retrieved February 28 from http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-features-20040210/. Deborah L. McGuinness and Frank van Harmelen (eds).