In vitro evaluation of a method for obtaining periapical radiographs for diagnosis of external apical root resorption

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 315-319

  Gegler, Aderson ^a   Fontanella, Vania ^a,b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

^b NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DENTAL CARE; EVALUATION; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; INCISOR; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; ODONTOMETRY; PERIODONTIUM; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

DENTAL MODELS; HUMANS; INCISOR; MAXILLA; ODONTOMETRY; PERIAPICAL TISSUE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROOT RESORPTION;

EID: 52449124438     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: 14602210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjm125     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Braga C P A, Machado L X, Gegler A, Mahl C E W, Fontanella V 2002 Materiais simuladores de tecidos moles na região posterior da mandíbula: avaliação por subtração radiográfica digital. In: Anais do Salão de Iniciação Científica UFRGS 14, p. 541
2. Crestani M B, Silva A E, Larentis N L, Fontanella V 2001 Avaliação da padronização radiográfica para a subtração digital de imagens. Revista da Faculdade de Odontologia, Porto Alegre 42: 25-30
3. Dixon D, Hildebold C F 2005 An overview of radiographic film holders. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 34: 67-73
4. Goldberg F, De Silvio A, Dreyer C 1998 Radiographic assessment of simulated external root resorption cavities in maxillary incisors. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology 14:133-136
5. Graf J M, Mounir A, Payot P, Cimasoni G 1988 A simple paralleling instrument for superimposing radiographs of the molar regions. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, and Oral Pathology 66: 502-506
6. Gröndahl K, Gröndahl H G, Webber R L 1984 Influence of variations in projection geometry on the detectability of periodontal bone lesions. A comparison between subtraction radiography and conventional radiographic techniques. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 11: 411-420
7. Hausmann E, Allen K M, Piedmonte M R 1991 Influence of variations in projection geometry and lesion size on detection of computer-simulated crestal alveolar bone lesions by subtraction radiography. Journal of Periodontal Research 26: 48-51
8. Hausmann E, Allen K, Loza J, Buchanan W, Cavanaugh Jr P F 1996 Validation of quantitative digital subtraction radiography using the electronically guided alignment device/impression technique. Journal of Periodontology 67: 895-899
9. Heo M S, Lee S S, Lee K H, Choi H M, Choi S C, Park T W 2001 Quantitative analysis of apical root resorption by means of digital subtraction radiography. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics 91: 369-373
10. Hintze H, Wenzel A, Andreasen F M, Sewerin I 1992 Digital subtraction radiography for assessment of simulated root resorption cavities. Performance of conventional and reverse contrast modes. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology 8: 149-154
11. Holmes J P, Gulabivala K, van der Stelt P F 2001 Detection of simulated internal tooth resorption using conventional radiography and subtraction imaging. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 30: 249-254
12. Laux M, Abbott P V, Pajarola G, Nair P N 2000 Apical inflammatory root resorption: a correlative radiographic and histological assessment. International Endodontic Journal 33: 483-493
13. Leach H A, Ireland A J, Whaites E J 2001 Radiographic diagnosis of root resorption in relation to orthodontics. British Dental Journal 190: 16-22
14. Levander E, Malmgren O 1988 Evaluation of the risk of root resorption during orthodontic treatment: a study of upper incisors. European Journal of Orthodontics 10: 30-38
15. Levander E, Bajka R, Malmgren O 1998 Early radiographic diagnosis of apical root resorption during orthodontic treatment: a study of maxillary incisors. European Journal of Orthodontics 20: 57-63
16. Maltz M, de Oliveira E F, Fontanella V, Bianchi R 2002 A clinical, microbiologic, and radiographic study of deep caries lesions after incomplete caries removal. Quintessence International 33: 151-159
17. Mol A, Dunn S M 2003 Effect of bone chip orientation on quantitative estimates of changes in bone mass using digital subtraction radiography. Journal of Periodontal Research 38: 296-302
18. Nance R S, Tyndall D, Levin L G, Trope M 2000 Diagnosis of external root resorption using TACT (tuned-aperture computed tomography). Endodontics and Dental Traumatology 16: 24-28
19. Parker R J, Harris E F 1998 Directions of orthodontic tooth movements associated with external apical root resorption of the maxillary central incisor. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 114: 677-683
20. Rosling B, Hollender L, Nymann S, Olsson G 1975 A radiographic method for assessing changes in alveolar bone height following periodontal therapy. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 2: 211-217
21. Rudolph D J, White S C 1988 Film-holding instruments for intraoral subtraction radiography. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, and Oral Pathology 65: 767-772
22. Souza D M 2001 Avaliação in vitro de Lesões de furcas mandibulares por uma técnica de subtração radiográfica. Thesis, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre
23. Tronstad L, Debelian G J 1998 Reabsorções radiculares: etiologia, manifestações clínicas e terapia. In: Melo L L (ed.). Traumatismo alvéolo-dentário: etiologia, diagnóstico e tratamento. São Paulo: Artes Médicas, pp. 127-157.
24. Wenzel A, Sewerin I 1991 Sources of noise in digital subtraction radiography. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics 71: 503-508
25. Zappa U, Simona C, Graf H, Van Akin J 1991 In vivo determination of radiographic projection errors produced by a novel filmholder and an X-ray beam manipulator. Journal of Periodontology 62: 674-683