High accuracy of genetic discrimination among chicken lines obtained through an individual assignment test

Animal Genetics

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 567-571

  Tadano, R ^a   Nishibori, M ^a   Tsudzuki, M ^a  

^a HIROSHIMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bayesian method; Chicken lines; Distance based method; FST estimate; Individual assignment; Microsatellite marker

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CHICKEN; CLASSIFICATION; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; POPULATION GENETICS;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; CHICKENS; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOTYPE; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS;

EID: 52449114801     PISSN: 02689146     EISSN: 13652052     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2008.01770.x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bjørnstad G. Røed K.H. (2002) Evaluation of factors affecting individual assignment precision using microsatellite data from horse breeds and simulated breed crosses. Animal Genetics 33, 264 70.
2. Blott S.C., Williams J.L. Haley C.S. (1999) Discriminating among cattle breeds using genetic markers. Heredity 82, 613 9.
3. Bowcock A.M., Ruiz-Linares A., Tomfohrde J., Minch E., Kidd J.R. Cavalli-Sforza L.L. (1994) High resolution of human evolutionary trees with polymorphic microsatellites. Nature 368, 455 7.
4. Cornuet J.-M., Piry S., Luikart G., Estoup A. Solignac M. (1999) New methods employing multilocus genotypes to select or exclude populations as origins of individuals. Genetics 153, 1989 2000.
5. Dieringer D. Schlötterer C. (2003) microsatellite analyser (msa): a platform independent analysis tool for large microsatellite data sets. Molecular Ecology Notes 3, 167 9.
6. Estoup A., Rousset F., Michalakis Y., Cornuet J.-M., Adriamanga M. Guyomard R. (1998) Comparative analysis of microsatellite and allozyme markers: a case study investigating microgeographic differentiation in brown trout (Salmo trutta). Molecular Ecology 7, 339 53.
7. Felsenstein J. (2005) phylip (phylogeny inference package) Version 3.6. Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
8. Koskinen M.T. (2003) Individual assignment using microsatellite DNA reveals unambiguous breed identification in the domestic dog. Animal Genetics 34, 297 301.
9. Marshall T.C., Slate J., Kruuk L.E.B. Pemberton J.M. (1998) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Molecular Ecology 7, 639 55.
10. Nei M. (1987) Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Columbia University Press, New York, USA.
11. Nei M., Tajima F. Tateno Y. (1983) Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data II, Gene frequency data. Journal of Molecular Evolution 19, 153 70.
12. Piry S., Alapetite A., Cornuet J.-M., Paetkau D., Baudouin L. Estoup A. (2004) geneclass2: a software for genetic assignment and first-generation migrant detection. Journal of Heredity 95, 536 9.
13. Rannala B. Mountain J.L. (1997) Detecting immigration by using multilocus genotypes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 94, 9197 201.
14. Saitou N. Nei M. (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 4, 406 25.
15. Schneider S., Roessli D. Excoffier L. (2000) arlequin Version 2000: A Software for Population Genetics Data Analysis. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
16. Tadano R., Sekino M., Nishibori M. Tsudzuki M. (2007) Microsatellite marker analysis for the genetic relationships among Japanese long-tailed chicken breeds. Poultry Science 86, 460 9.
17. Weir B.S. Cockerham C.C. (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38, 1358 70.