Patients' priorities for health research: Focus group study of patients with chronic kidney disease

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Volumn 23, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 3206-3214

  Tong, Allison ^a,b   Sainsbury, Peter ^b,c   Carter, Stacy M ^b,d   Hall, Bronwyn ^b   Harris, David C ^e   Walker, Rowan G ^f   Hawley, Carmel M ^g   Chadban, Steven ^h   Craig, Jonathan C ^a,b  

^a CHILDREN S HOSPITAL AT WESTMEAD   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c Centre for Population Health   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^e WESTMEAD HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^f ROYAL MELBOURNE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^g UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^h ROYAL PRINCE ALFRED HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

Chronic kidney disease; Decision making; Patient involvement; Qualitative research; Research priorities

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CAREGIVER SUPPORT; CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE; COMPLICATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; EMOTION; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PATIENT CARE; PERSONAL NEEDS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIOECONOMICS; SYMPTOMATOLOGY;

ADULT; AGED; AUSTRALIA; CAREGIVERS; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITY OF LIFE; RENAL DIALYSIS; RENAL INSUFFICIENCY, CHRONIC; RESEARCH; SOCIAL SUPPORT; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 52449112646     PISSN: 09310509     EISSN: 14602385     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfn207     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Goodare H, Smith R. The rights of patients in research. Br Med J 1995; 310: 1277-1278
2. Grant-Pearce C, Miles I, Hills P. Mismatches in priorities for health research between professionals and consumers. A report to the standing advisory group on consumer involvment in the NHS R&D prgramme. Manchester: PREST Policy Research in Engineering, Science and Technology, Manchester University, 1998, 1-59
3. Richards T. Patients' priorities. Br Med J 1999; 318: 277
4. Entwistle VA, Renfrew MJ, Yearly S et al. Lay perspectives: advantages for health research. Br Med J 1998; 316: 463-466
5. Oliver S, Clark Jones L, Rees R et al. Involving consumers in research development agenda setting for the NHS: developing an evidence-based approach. Health Technol Assess 2004; 8: 1-148
6. Goodare H, Lockwood S. Involving patients in clinical research: improves the quality of research. Br Med J 1999; 319: 724-725
7. Chalmers I. What do Iwant from health research and researchers when I am a patient? Br Med J 1995; 310: 1315-1318
8. Caron-Flinterman JF BJ, Teerling J, Bunders JFG. Patients' priorities concerning health research: the case of asthma and COPD research in The Netherlands. Health Expect 2005; 8: 253-263
9. Tallon D, Chard J, Dieppe P. Exploring the priorities of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Care Res 2000; 13: 312-319
10. Tallon D, Chard J, Dieppe P. Relation between agendas of the research community and the research consumer. Lancet 2000; 355: 2037-2040
11. Mordan DL, Scannell AU. Planning Focus Groups, Vol. 2. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998
12. Kreugar RA. Developing Questions for Focus Group, Vol. 3. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998
13. Reviewers Handbook: Medical Research Council, 2007. http://www.mrc.ac.uk/ Utilities/Documentrecord/index.htm?d=MRC00-3184
14. NIH: National Institutes of Health. Comparison of updated and previous criteria for evaluating research grant applications, 2004: http://grants1.nih. gov/grants/peer/peer.htm#documents
15. National Health and Medical Research Council. Guide to assessors of NHMRC Project Grant Applications. Australian Government, 2005: http://www.nhmrc.gov. au/funding/apply/granttype/projects/assessment.htm
16. NIH Council of Public Representatives. Enhancing Public Input and Transparency in the National Institutes of Health Research Priority-Setting Process. Bethesda: NIH Council of Public Representatives (COPR), 2004
17. Australian Government National Health and Medical Research Council. A Model Framework for Consumer and Community Participation in Health and Medical Research. Canberra: Australian Government National Health and Medical Research Council, 2004
18. Hanley B BJ, Gorin S, Barnes M et al. Involving consumers in research and development in the NHS: briefing notes for researchers. Winchester: Consumers in NHS Support Unit, 2000
19. O'Donnell M, Entwistle V. Consumer involvement in research projects: the activities of research funders. Health Policy 2004; 69: 229-238
20. Singer MA. Community participation in health-care decision-making - is it feasible. CMAJ 1995; 153: 421-424
21. Oliver S, Gray J. A Bibliography of Research Reports about Patients', Clinicians' and Researchers' Priorities for New Research. London: Lind Alliance, 2006
22. Montaner JS, O'Shaughnessy MV, Schechter MT. Industry-sponsored clinical research: a double-edged sword. Lancet 2001; 358: 1893-1895
23. Moses H, Dorsey ER, Matheson DH et al. Financial anatomy of biomedical research. JAMA 2005; 294: 1333-1342
24. Lindberg K, Churchill DN, Fishbane S. Research directions: new clinical frontiers. Am J Kidney Dis 2000; 36: S52-S61
25. Hayes KC, Basset-Spiers K, Das R et al. Research priorities for urological care following spinal cod injury: recommendations of an expert panel. Can J Urol 2007; 14: 3416-3423
26. American Society of Nephrology. American Society of Nephrology Renal Research Report. J Am Soc Nephrol 2005; 167: 1886-1903
27. Popay J, Williams G, Thomas C et al. Theorising inequalities in health. The place of lay knowledge. Sociol Health Illn 1998; 20: 619-644
28. Prior L. Belief, knowledge and expertise: the emergence of the lay expert in medical sociology. Sociol Health Illn 2003; 25: 41-57
29. Abma TA. Patients as partners in a health research agenda setting: the feasibility of a participatory methodology. Eval Health Prof 2006; 29: 424-439