The baseline characteristics did not differ significantly

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 17, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 1047-1048

  Fayers, Peter ^a,b   King, Madeleine ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^b Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine ^*  (Norway)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE; GENDER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; QUALITY OF LIFE; SHORT SURVEY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUALITY OF LIFE; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

EID: 52449106449     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-008-9382-x     Document Type: Short Survey

References (4)

1. PM Fayers 2008 The scales were highly correlated: P = 0.0001 Quality of Life Research 17 651 652
2. C Roberts DJ Torgerson 1999 Baseline imbalance in randomised controlled trials BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 319 185
3. European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (EMEA), Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products (CPMP) (2003). Points to consider on adjustment for baseline covariates. CPMP/EWP/283/99. http://www.emea.europa. eu/pdfs/human/ewp/286399en.pdf. Downloaded 20 Feb 2008.
4. Senn, S. (2007). Statistical issues in drug development. Chichester: Wiley, ISBN 0-471-97488-9.