Costs and risks of conforming to EU traceability requirements: The case of hard red spring wheat

Agribusiness

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 85-101

  Wilson, William W ^a   Henry, Xavier ^b   Dahl, Bruce L ^a  

^a NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Plantureux ^*  (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 52449090389     PISSN: 07424477     EISSN: 15206297     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/agr.20148     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bertolini, B., Bevilacqua, M., & Massini, R. (2006). FMECA approach to product traceability in the food industry. Food Control, 17, 137-145.
2. Bullock, D., Desquilbet, M., & Nitsi, E. (2000, November). The economies of non-GMO segregation and identity preservation. Instut National de la Recherche Agronomique of Rennes and University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, Working Paper.
3. Commission of the European Communities. (2003). Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 Septembre 2003 concerning the traceability and labeling of genetically modified organisms and amending Directive 2001/18/EC. Official Journal of the European Communities, 18/10/2003.
4. Environmental Systems Research Institute. (2004). Identity preserve of agricultural crops. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA. Retrieved February 2004 from http://www.esri.com/agriculture.
5. European Parliament. (2003, May 11). Call for proposals for indirect RTD actions under the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: Integrating and strengthening the European Research area. Official Journal of the European Union.
6. Ferriere, J. (2003, July). Overview of EU biotech legislation. European Commission Directorate General of Trade. Paper session at Iowa State University, Ames.
7. Furtan, W.H., Gray, R.S., & Holzman, J.J. (2003). The optimal time to license a biotech lemon. Contemporary Economic Policy, 21(October), 433-444.
8. Gencod EAN France. (2001, April). Traceability in the supply chain from strategy to practice. Gencod-EAN France, Issyles-Moulineaux.
9. Golan, E., Krissoff, N., Kuchler, F., Calvin, L., Nelson, K., & Price, G. (2004). Traceability in the U.S. food supply: Economic theory and industry studies. Agricultural Economics (Report No. 830). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.
10. Hobbs, J. (2004). Information asymmetry and the role of traceability systems. Agribusiness, 20(4),397-415.
11. Hobbs, J., & Kerr, W. (2006). Consumer information, labeling and international trade in agri-food products. Food Policy, 31(1), 78-89.
12. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. (1990). IEEE standard computer dictionary: A compilation of IEEE standard computer glossaries. New York.
13. International Institute for Beet Research. (2003). GMO cultivation soon to be authorized within the European Union. Le Betteravier francais (No.812). Paris, France.
14. Loureiro, M. (2003). GMO food labeling in the EU: Tracing the seeds of dispute. EuroChoices, 2(1), 18-23.
15. MacDonald, J., & Korb, P. (2006). Agricultural contracting update: Contracts in 2003. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. (Economic Information Bulletin No. EIB9).
16. Matus-Cadiz, M.A., Hucl, P., Horak, M.J., & Blomquist, L.K. (2004). Gene flow in wheat at the field scale. Crop Science Society of America, 44, 718-727.
17. Monsanto. (2004, May). Monsanto to realign research portfolio, development of roundup ready wheat deferred: Decision follows portfolio review. Company press release, Consultation with Growers, St. Louis, MO.
18. Moschini, G., Bulut, H., & Cembalo, L. (2005). On the segregation of genetically modified, conventional and organic products in European agriculture. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 56(3), 347-372.
19. Palisade Corporation. (1998). Risk optimizer: Optimization with simulation for Microsoft Excel. Newfield, NY: Author.
20. Peterson, D. (2002). Procurement strategies for end-users to meet functional characteristics. Unpublished master's thesis. North Dakota State University, Fargo.
21. Serrao, A., & Coelho, L. (2000). The role of area-yield crop insurance in farmers' adjustment against risk in a dryland region of Portugal. Paper presented at the American Agricultural Association Annual Meeting.
22. Sheldon, I. (1996). Contracting, imperfect information, and the food system. Review of Agricultural Economics, 18 (January), 7-19.
23. Shepherd, R., Barker, G., French, S., Hart, A, Maule, J., & Cassidy, A. (2006). Managing food chain risks: Integrating technical and stakeholder perspectives on uncertainty. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57(2), 313-327.
24. Sosland Publishing. (2004, June 22). Monsanto withdraws applications. Milling and Baking News (p. 8).
25. Swenson, A., & Haugen, R. (2003). Projected 2004 crop budgets-North Central North Dakota. Farm Management Planning Guide. Fargo, North Dakota State University Extension Service.
26. Sykuta, M. (2005). Agricultural organization in an era of traceability. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 37(2).
27. U.S. Department of Agriculture. (2004). National agricultural statistics service. Grain stocks report. Available at http://www.nass.usda.gov/nd/jangrstk.pdf.
28. U.S. Wheat Associates. (2006, February). Position on biotechnology. Joint statement with National Association of Wheat Growers and WETEC. Washington, DC: Author.
29. Wilson, W., & Dahl, B. (2005). Costs and risks of testing and segregating GM wheat. Review of Agricultural Economics, 27(2), 212-228.
30. Wilson, W., & Dahl, B. (2006). Costs and risks of segregating GM wheat in Canada. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 54(3), 341-359.
31. Wilson, W., Jabs, E., & Dahl, B. (2007). Optimal testing strategies for genetically modified wheat. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 36(1), 39-48.
32. Wright, Y., & Tilley, M. (2004). Wheat segregation and identity-preservation cost. Paper presented at the Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Tulsa, OK, February 18.