Self-avoiding tethered membranes with quenched random internal disorders

Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 338-348

  Mori, Shintaro ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 5244279227     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.54.338     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Proceedings of the Fifth Jerusalem Winter School,``Statistical Mechanics of Membranes and Surfaces,” edited by D. R. Nelson, T. Piran, and S. Weinberg (World Scientific, Singapore, 1989).
2. Y. Kantor, M. Kardar and D. R. Nelson, Phys. Rev. Lett.57, 791 (1986);
3. Y. Kantor, M. Kardar and D. R. Nelson, Phys. Rev. A35, 3056 (1987).
4. Y. Kantor and D. R. Nelson, Phys. Rev. Lett.58, 774 (1987);
5. Y. Kantor and D. R. Nelson, Phys. Rev. A36, 4020 (1987).
6. D. R. Nelson and L. Peliti, J. Phys. (Paris)48, 1085 (1986).
7. E. Guitter, F. David, S. Leibler and L. Peliti, Phys. Rev. Lett.61, 2949 (1988);
8. J. Phys. (Paris)50, 1787 (1989).
9. J. Aronovitz and T. C. Lubensky, Phys. Rev. Lett.60, 2636 (1988).
10. J. Aronowitz, L. Golubovic and T. C. Lubensky, J. Phys. (Paris)50, 609 (1989).
11. M. Plischke and D. Boal, Phys. Rev. A38, 4943 (1988).
12. F. F. Abraham, W. Rudge and M. Plischke, Phys. Rev. Lett.62, 1757 (1989).
13. D. Boal, E. Levinson, D. Liu and M. Plischke, Phys. Rev. A40, 3292 (1989).
14. F. F. Abraham and D. R. Nelson, J. Phys. (Paris)51, 2653 (1990).
15. Y. Kantor and K. Kremer, Phys. Rev. E48, 2490 (1993).
16. A. Baumgarter and W. Renz, Europhys. Lett.17, 381 (1992).
17. D. M. Kroll and G. Gompper, J. Phys. (France) I3, 1131 (1993).
18. Omitted end note.
19. E. Guitter and J. Palmeri, Phys. Rev. A45, 734 (1992).
20. P. Le Doussal, J. Phys. A25, L469 (1992).
21. M. Goulian, J. Phys. (France) II1, 1327 (1991).
22. G. S. Grest, J. Phys. (France) I1, 1695 (1991).
23. H. S. Seung and D. R. Nelson, Phys. Rev. A38, 1005 (1988).
24. C. Carraro and D. R. Nelson, Phys. Rev. E48, 3082 (1993).
25. Omitted end note.
26. M. Mutz, D. Bensimon and M. J. Brienne, Phys. Rev. Lett.67, 923 (1991).
27. D. Bensimon, M. Mutz and T. Gulik, Physica A194, 190 (1993).
28. D. R. Nelson and L. Radzihovsky, Europhys. Lett.16, 79 (1991).
29. L. Radzihovsky and D. R. Nelson, Phys. Rev. A44, 3525 (1991).
30. D. C. Morse, T. C. Lubensky and G. S. Grest, Phys. Rev. A45, 2151 (1992).
31. D. C. Morse and T. C. Lubensky, Phys. Rev. A46, 1751 (1992).
32. L. Radzihovsky and P. Le Doussal, J. Phys. (France) I2, 599 (1992).
33. D. Bensimon, D. Mukamel and L. Peliti, Europhys. Lett.18, 269 (1992).
34. P. Le Doussal and L. Radzihovsky, Phys. Rev. B48, 3548 (1993).
35. D. R. Nelson and L. Radzihovsky, Phys. Rev. A46, 7474 (1992).
36. S. Mori and M. Wadati, Phys. Lett. A185, 206 (1994).
37. S. Mori and M. Wadati, Phys. Rev. E50, 867 (1994).
38. D. C. Morse, I. B. Petsche, G. S. Grest and T. C. Lubensky, Phys. Rev. A46, 6745 (1992).
39. In preparing an initial configuration of monomers in the fluid phase, we use the Monte Carlo method instead of molecular dynamics. This point is the only difference between Refs. 35 and 38 and we suppose that disorders in both models are the same.
40. S. Mori, Phys. Lett.207, 87 (1995).
41. S. Mori, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn (to be published). In this work we have improved several points in the previous work 37 and studied the model more extensively.
42. In Ref. 35 the nature of the disorder in polymerized fluid membranes is discussed. Even if the membrane has disclinations, their correlations are screened by surrounding dislocations and it becomes short ranged.
43. Y. Kantor, Europhys. Lett.20, 337 (1992).
44. In Ref. 40, a slightly different potential was used.
45. In Ref. 40, the reference length b is 1 and the value of v is taken to be 0.4.
46. Omitted end note.
47. The behavior of structure factors for the membrane with (b,v)=(1.7,0.3) is not good. The reason is not clear and our conclusion that the membrane is flat is only from the spatial conformation [Fig. 2(b)] and that the shrink is small (Fig. 6).