Building in resistance

Journal of Forestry

Volumn 95, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 24-27

  Cheng, Z M ^a   Shi, N Q ^b   Herman, D E ^b   Capps, T K ^b  

^a NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NDSU ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 5244269284     PISSN: 00221201     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. BECKER, H. 1996. New American elms restore stately trees. Agriculture Research 44(7):4-8.
2. BOB, C.F., B.L. REDMOND, and D.F. KARNOSKY. 1986. On the nature of intra- and interspecific incompatibility in Ulmus. American Journal of Botany 73:465-74.
3. BOLYARD, M.G., R.K. HAJELA, and M.B. STICKLEN. 1991. Microprojectile and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Pioneer elm. Journal of Arboriculture 17:34-37.
4. BROGLIE, K., I. CHET, M. HOLLIDAY, R. CRESSMAN, P. BIDDLE, S. KNOWLTON, C.J. MAUVAIS and R. BROGLIE. 1991. Transgenic plants with enhanced resistance to the fungal pathogen Rhizoctonia solani. Science 254:1,194-197.
5. CAPPS, T.K. 1997. Selection, propagation, and inoculation of American elms with potential Dutch elm disease resistance. Master's thesis, North Dakota State University, Fargo.
6. CAPPS, T., D. HERMAN, and Z.-M. CHENG. 1994. Update on search for Dutch elm disease resistant American elm. Windbreak Demonstrator, North Dakota State University Extension Publication 4(4):6.
7. CHENG, Z.-M., N.-Q. SHI, L. TOKACH, and B.K. GASCHK. 1992. Shoot regeneration from leaf tissues of American elm and Siberian elm. HortScience 27:584.
8. FENNING, T.M., S.S. TYMENS, J.S. GARTLAND, C.M. BRASIER, and K.M.A. GARTLAND. 1996. Transformation and regeneration of English elm using wild-type Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Science 116:37-46.
9. FRALEY, R.T., S.G., ROGERS, and R.B. HORSCH. 1986. Genetic transformation in higher plants. CRC Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 4:1-46.
10. GEORGE, M.W., and R.R. TRIPEPI. 1994. Cytokinins, donor plants and time in culture affect shoot regenerative capability of American elm leaves. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Culture 39:27-36.
11. KARNOSKY, D.F., and R.A. MICKLER. 1986. Elms (Ulmus spp.). In Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry, vol. 1: Trees 1, ed. Y.P.S. Bajaj, 326-40. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
12. LLOYD, G., and B. MCCOWN. 1980. Commercially feasible micropropagation of mountain laurel Kalmia latifolia by use of shoot tip culture. Combined Proceedings of International Plant Propagators' Society 30:421-26.
13. MURASHIGE, T., and F. SKOOG. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum 15: 473-97.
14. POTRYKUS, I. 1991. Gene transfer to plants: Assessment of published approaches and results. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 42:205-25.
15. SANFORD, J.C. 1988. The biolistic process. Trends in Biotech 6:299-302.
16. SANTAMOUR JR., F.S., and S.E BENTZ. 1995 Updated checklist of elm (Ulmus) cultivars for use in North America. Journal of Arboriculture 21:122-31.
17. SHERALD, J.L., F.S. SANTAMOUR JR., R.K. HAJELA, N. HAJELA, and M.B. STICKLEN. 1993. A Dutch elm disease resistant triploid elm. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 24:647-53.
18. SMALLEY, E.B., and R.P. GURIES. 1993. Breeding elms for resistance to Dutch elm disease. Annual Review of Phytopathology 31:325-52.
19. SMALLEY, E.B., R.P. GURIES, and D.T. LESTER. 1993. American Liberty elms and beyond: Going from impossible to the difficult. In Dutch elm disease research: Cellular and molecular approaches, eds. M.B. Sticklen and J.L. Sherald, 26-45. New York: Springer-Verlag.
20. STICKLEN, M.B., M.G. BOLYARD, R.K. HAJELA, and L.C. DUCHESNE. 1991. Molecular and cellular aspects of Dutch elm disease. Phytoprotection 72:1-13.
21. TOWNSEND, A.M., S.E. BENTZ, and G.R. JOHNSON. 1995. Variation in response of selected American elm clones to Ophiostoma uimi. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 13:126-28.
22. TOWNSEND, A.M., and F.S. SANTAMOUR JR. 1993. Progress in the development of disease-resistant elms. In Dutch elm disease research: Cellular and molecular approaches, eds. M.B. Sticklen and J.L. Sherald, 46-50. New York: Springer-Verlag.