Hybrid random multi-criteria decision-making approach with incomplete certain information

Chinese Control and Decision Conference, 2008, CCDC 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1444-1448

  Wang, Jian Qiang ^a   Wang, Run Qi ^a  

^a CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Hybrid random; Incomplete certain information; Multi criteria decision making; TOPSIS

Indexed keywords

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; FUZZY RULES; FUZZY SETS; LINGUISTICS; PROBLEM SOLVING; RANDOM PROCESSES; RANDOM VARIABLES; TRIANGULATION;

DECISION MATRICES; FUZZY NUMBERS; HYBRID RANDOM; INCOMPLETE CERTAIN INFORMATION; INTERVAL NUMBERS; LINGUISTIC TERMS; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING; NEW APPROACHES; NUMERICAL EXAMPLES; TOPSIS;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 52349124260     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CCDC.2008.4597557     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Fandel G, Gal T. Multiple Cntena Decision Making: Theory and Applcation.New York: Springer Verlag, 1980.
2. Jacquel Lagreze E, Siskos Y. Preference Disaggregation: 20 Years of MCDA Experience. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 130(2): 233-245.
3. Zopounidis C, Doumpos M. Multi-Criteria Classification and Sorting Methods: A Literature Review. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 138(2):229-246.
4. Jiupin Xu, Wei Wu. Multi-Attribute Decision-making Theory and Method. Tsinghua Publishing House, 2006, 4-11.
5. Stewart T. J. A Descriptive Approach to Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Journal of Operational Research Society, 1981, 32(1):45-53.
6. Pawlak Z, Slowinski R. Rough Set Approach to Multi-Attribute Decision Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 1994, 72(3):443-459.
7. Jianqiang Wang. Research on Several Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Problems with Uncertain Information. Changsha: Central South University, 2005.
8. Liang G. S. Fuzzy MCDM Based on Ideal and Anti-ideal Concepts. European Journal of Operational Research, 1999, 112:682-691.
9. Zheshui Xu. Approach and Application of Fuzzy MCDM Based on Expectation.Theory and practice of system project, 2004, 1:109-114.
10. Herrera F, Herrera Viedma E, Martinez L. Representation Models for Aggregating Linguistic Information: Issues and analysis [A]. In: Mesiar R,Calvo T.Eds. Aggregation Operators: New Trends and Applications.Senes Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, Psica-Verlag, 2001.
11. Maciej Nowak. Preference and Veto Thresholds in Multicriteria Analysis Based on Stochastic Dominance. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004, 158:339-350.
12. Enrico De Giorgi. Reward.Risk Portfolio Selection and Stochastic Dominance. Journal of Banking &Finance,2005,29:895-926.
13. Risto Lahdelma, Joonas Hokkanen, Pekka Salminen. SMAA-Stochastic Multiobjective Acceptability Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 1998, 106:137-143.
14. Jun Tian, Dequan He, Dengshi Huang. Approach and Application of Investment Evaluation Based on Multi-Criteria Stochastic DEA Model.China Management Science, 2000, 8(4):43-49.
15. Songbao Ying, Yaohuang Guo. Approach of Investment Evaluation Based on Multi-Criteria Stochastic DEA Model, Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2003, 38(1):92-96.
16. Kazimierz Zaras. Rough Approximation of A Preference Relation by a Multi-Attribute Stochastic Dominance for Determimst, Stochastic and Fuzzy Decision Problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004, 159:196-206.
17. Yongqi Xia, Qizhong Wu. An approach to mixed multi-attribute decision-making problem based on Topsis. Journal of systems engineering,2004, 19(6):630-634.