Analysis of the environmental benefits of Distributed Generation

IEEE Power and Energy Society 2008 General Meeting: Conversion and Delivery of Electrical Energy in the 21st Century, PES

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Qian, Kejun ^a   Zhou, Chengke ^a   Yuan, Yue ^b   Shi, Xiaodan ^b   Allan, Malcolm ^a  

^a GLASGOW CALEDONIAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b HOHAI UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Distributed generation; Environmental benefits; Generation performance standard

Indexed keywords

AIR POLLUTION; CONSERVATION; ENERGY CONSERVATION; ENERGY CONVERSION; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY UTILIZATION; ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FOOD PROCESSING; GALERKIN METHODS; GAS TURBINES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PLANNING; POTENTIAL ENERGY; POTENTIAL ENERGY SURFACES; RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

21ST CENTURY; ALL OVER THE WORLD; COMBINED HEAT-AND-POWER; DISTRIBUTED GENERATION; ELECTRICAL ENERGY; ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS; ENVIRONMENTALLY-FRIENDLY; GENERATION COSTS; GENERATION PERFORMANCE STANDARD; HIGH EFFICIENCY POWER GENERATION; MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; NEW MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NEW MODEL; POLLUTANT EMISSIONS; POWER INDUSTRIES; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES; SIMULATION RESULTS;

POWER GENERATION;

EID: 52349108970     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/PES.2008.4596137     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Integrating distributed resources into electric utility distribution systems[R]. California, EPRI PEAC Corporation, 2001
2. Energy Sustainable Development Ltd. Cogen Europe. The future of CHP in the European market - The European cogeneration study[R]. United Kingdom, Energy Sustainable Development Ltd., Cogen Europe, 2001.
3. Onsite Sycom Energy Corporation. Market assessment of combined heat and power in the state of California[R]. California, Onsite Sycom Energy Corporation, 1999.
4. Hatziargyriou N, Donnelly M, Papathanassiou S. CIGRE technical brochure on modeling new forms of generation and storage [R]. France, CIGRE Task Force 38.01.10, 2000.
5. Ding Shuying, Zhang Qingyu, Guo Hui. A modeling study on environmental costs of firepower generation[J]. Shanghai Environmental Science, 2007, 26(2):58-61.
6. Sun Ke. Environmental cost analysis and research of different power plants[J]. Energy Engineering, 2004, 23(3):23-26.
7. Wisconsin Distributed Resources Collaborative (WIDRC)[R]. Draft Collaborative Agreement, 24 Oct. 2000.
8. N. Jenkins, R. Allan, P. Crossley, D. Kirschen and G. Strbac, Embedded generation, IEE Power and Energy Series 31, London, 2000.
9. Singh D. Can solar photovoltaic become the major source of energy for village electrification and significantly contribute towards the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in the 21st century[C]. 2nd World Conference and Exhibition on Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conversion, Vienna, Austria, 1998:3313-3316.
10. Martens A. The energetic feasibility of CHP compared to separate production of heat and power[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 1998, 18(11):935-946.
11. Williams M C. Fuel cells and the world energy future[C]. IEEE Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, 2001:725-728.
12. Daly P A. Morrison J. Understanding the potential benefits of distributed generation on power delivery systems[C]. Rural Electric Power Conference Arkansas, 2001.
13. Hamilton S L, Micro turbine generator program[C]. Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, USA, 2000:1-4.
14. Ramakumar R, Butler N G, Rodriguez A P, et al. Economic aspects of advanced energy technologies[J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 1993, 81(3):318-332.
15. Wei Xuehao, Zhou Hao. Evaluating the environmental value schedule of pollutants mitigated in China thermal power industry[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2003, 16(1):53-56.