Optimizing story link detection is not equivalent to optimizing new event detection

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn 2003-July, Issue , 2003, Pages

  Farahat, Ayman ^a   Chen, Francine ^a   Brants, Thorsten ^a  

^a PALO ALTO RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

CORE TECHNOLOGY; EVENTS DETECTION; PART OF SPEECH TAGGING; PARTS-OF-SPEECH TAGGING; PERFORMANCE ENHANCING; PRECISION AND RECALL; SIMILARITY MEASURE; STORY LINK DETECTION; TOPIC DETECTION AND TRACKING;

SEARCH ENGINES;

EID: 52349095370     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. James Allan and Hema Raghavan. 2002. Using part-of-speech patterns to reduce query ambiguity. In ACM SIGIR2002, Tampere, Finland.
2. James Allan, Hubert Jin, Martin Rajman, Charles Wayne, and et. al. 1999. Topic-based novelty detection. Summer workshop final report, Center for Language and Speech Processing, Johns Hopkins University.
3. J. Allan, V. Lavrenko, D. Malin, and R. Swan. 2000a. Detections, bounds, and timelines: Umass and tdt-3. In Proceedings of Topic Detection and Tracking Workshop (TDT-3), Vienna, VA.
4. James Allan, Victor Lavrenko, and Hubert Jin. 2000b. First story detection in TDT is hard. In CIKM, pages 374-381.
5. Thorsten Brants, Francine Chen, and Ioannis Tsochantaridis. 2002. Topic-based document segmentation with probabilistic latent semantic analysis. In International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM), McLean, VA.
6. Jaime Carbonell, Yiming Yang, Ralf Brown, Chun Jin, and Jian Zhang. 2001. Cmu tdt report. Slides at the TDT-2001 meeting, CMU.
7. Francine Chen, Ayman Farahat, and Thorsten Brants. 2003. Story link detection and new event detection are asymmetric. In Proceedings of NAACL-HLT-2002, Edmonton, AL.
8. W. Bruce Croft, Stephen Cronen-Townsend, and Victor Larvrenko. 2001. Relevance feedback and personalization: A language modeling perspective. In DE-LOS Workshop: Personalisation and Recommender Systems in Digital Libraries.
9. Ted E. Dunning. 1993. Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Computational Linguistics, 19(1):61-74.
10. Wessel Kraaij and Renee Pohlmann. 1996. Viewing stemming as recall enhancement. In ACM SIGIR1996.
11. Victor Lavrenko, James Allan, Edward DeGuzman, Daniel LaFlamme, Veera Pollard, and Stephen Thomas. 2002. Relevance models for topic detection and tracking. In Proceedings of HLT-2002, San Diego, CA.
12. A. Pirkola and K. Jrvelin. 1996. The effect of anaphora and ellipsis resolution on proximity searching in a text database. Information Processing and Management, 32(2):199-216.
13. William H. Press, Saul A. Teukolsky, William Vetterling, and Brian Flannery. 1993. Numerical Recipes. Cambridge Unv. Press.
14. Charles Wayne. 2000. Multilingual topic detection and tracking: Successful research enabled by corpora and evaluation. In Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC), pages 1487-1494, Athens, Greece.
15. Jinxi Xu and W. Bruce Croft. 1998. Corpus-based stemming using cooccurrence of word variants. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 16(1):61-81.
16. Yiming Yang, Tom Pierce, and Jaime Carbonell. 1998. A study on retrospective and on-line event detection. In Proceedings of SIGIR-98, Melbourne, Australia.