Unsupervised estimation of segmentation quality using nonnegative factorization

26th IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Sandler, Roman ^a   Lindenbaum, Michael ^a  

^a TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER VISION; ESTIMATION; FACTORIZATION; FEATURE EXTRACTION; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE SENSORS; PATTERN RECOGNITION;

GROUND TRUTH; HUMAN JUDGMENT; IMAGE MODELING; INTRINSIC PROPERTIES; NON-NEGATIVE MATRIX FACTORIZATION; QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENTS; SEGMENTATION ALGORITHMS; SEGMENTATION ERRORS; SEGMENTATION QUALITY; UNSUPERVISED METHOD;

IMAGE SEGMENTATION;

EID: 52249118561     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2008.4587439     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. A. Amir and M. Lindenbaum. A generic grouping algorithm and its quantitative analysis. PAMI, 20(2):168-185, 1998.
2. M. Andreetto, L. Zelnik-Manor, and P. Perona. Non-parametric probabilistic image segmentation. In ICCV, 2007.
3. O. Ben-Shahar and S. Zucker. The perceptual organization of texture flow: A contextual inference approach. PAMI, 25(4):401-417, 2003.
4. M. Berry, M. Browne, A. Langville, P. Pauca, and R. Plemmons. Algorithms and applications for approximate nonnegative matrix factorization. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 52(1):155-173, September 2007.
5. E. Borenstein, E. Sharon, and S. Ullman. Combining top-down and bottom-up segmentation. In CVPRW, page 46, 2004.
6. M. Borsotti, P. Campadelli, and R. Schettini. Quantitative evaluation of color image segmentation results. Pattern Recogn. Lett., 19(8):741-747, 1998.
7. Y. Boykov and M.-P. Jolly. Interactive graph cuts for optimal boundary and region segmentation of objects in N-D images. In ICCV, pages 105-112, 2001.
8. S. Chabrier, B. Emile, H. Laurent, C. Rosenberger, and P. Marche. Unsupervised evaluation of image segmentation application to multi-spectral images. In ICPR, pages 576-579, 2004.
9. D. Comanicu and P. Meer. Mean shift: A robust approach toward feature space analysis. PAMI, 24(5):603-619, May 2002.
10. I. Dhillon and S. Sra. Generalized nonnegative matrix approximations with Bregman divergences. In NIPS, volume 18, pages 283-290, 2006.
11. D. Donoho and V. Stodden. When does non-negative matrix factorization give a correct decomposition into parts. In NIPS, 2003.
12. J. H. Elder and R. M. Goldberg. Ecological statistics of Gestalt laws for the perceptual organization of contours. J. Vis., 2(4):324-353, 8 2002.
13. F. J. Estrada and A. D. Jepson. Quantitative evaluation of a novel image segmentation algorithm. In CVPR, pages 1132-1139, 2005.
14. D. Jacobs. Robust and efficient detection of salient convex groups. PAMI, 18(1):23-37, 1996.
15. M. P. Kumar, P. H. S. Torr, and A. Zisserman. Obj cut. In CVPR, pages 18-25, 2005.
16. D. D. Lee and H. S. Seung. Algorithms for non-negative matrix factorization. NIPS, 13:556-562, 2001.
17. J. Malik, S. Belongie, T. K. Leung, and J. Shi. Contour and texture analysis for image segmentation. IJCV, 43(1):7-27, 2001.
18. D. Martin, C. Fowlkes, and J. Malik. Learning to detect natural image boundaries using local brightness, color, and texture cues. PAMI, 26(5):530-549, May 2004.
19. D. Martin, C. Fowlkes, D. Tal, and J. Malik. A database of human segmented natural images and its application to evaluating segmentation algorithms and measuring ecological statistics. In ICCV, volume II, pages 416-423, 2001.
20. P. Meer, B. Matei, and K. Cho. Performance Characterization in Computer Vision, chapter Input guided performance evaluation, pages 115-124. Kluwer, Amsterdam, 2000.
21. D. Mumford and J. Shah. Optimal approximations by piecewise smooth functions and associated variational problems. Comm. Pure Appl. Math, XLII:577-685, 1989.
22. P. Paatero and U. Tapper. Positive matrix factorization: a non-negative factor model with optimal utilization of error estimates of data values. Environmetrics, 5(2):111-126, 1994.
23. X. Ren and J. Malik. Learning a classification model for segmentation. In ICCV, pages 10-17, 2003.
24. S. Warfield, K. Zou, and W. Wells, III. Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (staple): An algorithm for the validation of image segmentation. MedImg, 23(7):903-921, July 2004.
25. L. R. Williams and K. K. Thornber. A comparison of measures for detecting natural shapes in cluttered backgrounds. IJCV, 34(2-3):81-96, 1999.
26. Y. Yitzhaky and E. Peli. A method for objective edge detection evaluation and detector parameter selection. PAMI, 25(8):1027-1033, August 2003.
27. H. Zhang, S. Cholleti, S. A. Goldman, and J. E. Fritts. Meta-evaluation of image segmentation using machine learning. In CVPR, pages 1138-1145, 2006.
28. Y. Zhang. A review of recent evaluation methods for image segmentation. ISSPA, 1:148-15, August 2001.