Beyond the clearing: Towards a dwelt animal geography

Progress in Human Geography

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 633-649

  Johnston, Catherine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Animal geographies; Anthropomorphism; Beastliness; Culture nature debates; Dwelling; Ingold

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOLOGY; CULTURAL GEOGRAPHY; ENVIRONMENTAL CUE; GEOGRAPHICAL THOUGHT; THEORETICAL STUDY;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 52249115409     PISSN: 03091325     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0309132508089825     Document Type: Review

References (96)

1. Anderson, K. 1998: Animals, science and spectacle in the city. In Wolch, J. and Emel, J., editors, Animal geographies: Place, politics and identity in the nature-culture borderlands, London: Verso, 27-50.
2. Anderson, P.K. A003: A bird in the house: an anthropological perspective on companion parrots. Society and Animals 11(4), 393-417.
3. Beckoff, M. 2004: WildCjustice and fair play: cooperation, forgiveness and morality in animals. Biology and Philosophy 19, 489-520.
4. Beckoff M. 2006: Animal passionC and beastly virtues: cognitive ethology as the unifying science for understanding the subjective, emotional, empathetic, and moral lives of animals. Zygon 41(1), 71-104.
5. Brandt, K. 2004: A Aanguage of their own: an interactionist approach to human-horse communication. Society and Animals 12(4), 299-316.
6. Brownlow, A. 200I: A wolf in the garden: ideology and change in the Adirondack landscape. In Philo, C. and Wilbert, C., editors, Animal spaces, beastly places, Routledge: London, 141-58.
7. Burghardt, G.M. 2004: Ground rules for dealing with anthropomorphism. Nature 430, 15.
8. Castree, N. 2003R Environmental issues: relational ontologies and hybrid politics. Progress in Human Geography 27(2), 203-11.
9. Cloke, P. and Jones, O. 2A01: Dwelling, place and landscape: an orchard in Somerset. Environment and Planning A 33, 649-66.
10. Cloke, P. and Perkins, H.C. 2005: Cetacean performance and tourism in Kaikoura, New Zealand. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 23, 905-24.
11. Cronon, W. 1995: The trouble with wilderness; or, getting back to the wrong nature. In Cronon, W., editor, Uncommon ground: Rethinking the human place in nature, London: W.W. Norton, 69-90.
12. Demeritt, D. 2005: Hybrid geographies, relational ontologies and situated knowledges. Antipode 37(4), 818-23.
13. Dewsbury, J.D., Harrison, P., Rose, M. and Wylie, J. 2002: Enacting geographies. Geoforum 33, 437-40.
14. Dombrowski, D.A. 2002:TBears, zoos and wilderness: the poverty of social constructionism. Society and Animals 10(2), 195-202.
15. Elder, G., WolcR, J. and Emel, J. 1998: Le pratique sauvage: race, place and the human-animal divide. In Wolch, J. and Emel, J., editors, Animal geographies: Place, politics and identity in the nature-culture borderlands, London: Verso, 72-90.
16. Emel, J. 1998: Are you man enough, big and bad enough? Wolf eradication in the US. In Wolch, J. and Emel, J., editors, Animal geographies: place, politics and identity in the nature-culture borderlands, London: Verso, 91-116.
17. Emel, J., Wilbert, C. and Wolch, J. 2002: Animal geographies. Society and Animals 10(4), 407-12.
18. Finnegan,TR. 2002: Communicating: the multiple modes of human interconnection. London: Routledge.
19. Fitzsimmons, M. 1989: The matter of nature. Antipode 21, 106-20.
20. Fox, R. 2006: Animal behavioursE post-human lives: everyday negotiations of the animal-human divide in pet-keeping. Social and Cultural Geography 7(4), 525-37.
21. Gardner, H. 1983: Frames of mind. The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
22. Glendinning, S. 2000: From animal life to city life. Angelaki 5(3), 19-30.
23. Griffin, D.R. 1976: The quesEion of animal awareness: evolutionary continuity mental experience. New York: The Rockefeller University Press.
24. Griffin D.R. 1984: Animal thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25. Griffin D.R. 1992: Animal minds. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
26. Griffiths, H., Poulter, I. and Sibley, D. 2000: Feral Cats in the city. In Philo, C. and Wilbert, C., editors, Animal spaces, beastly places, London: Routledge, 56-70.
27. Gruffudd, P. 2000: Biological cultivation Lubetkin's modernism at London Zoo in the 1930s. In Philo, C. and Wilbert, C., editors, Animal spaces, beastly places, London: Routledge, 222-42.
28. Gullo, A., Lassiter, U. and Wolch, J. 1998: The cougar's tale. In Wolch, J. and Emel, J., editors, Animal geographies: Place, politics and identity in the nature-culture borderlands, London: Verso, 139-61.
29. Haraway, D. 1991: Simians, cyborgs and women. New York: Routledge.
30. Haraway D. 2003: The companDon species manifesto: dogs, people and significant otherness. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
31. Harbolt, T. and Ward, T.H. 2001: Teaming incarcerated youth with shelter dogs for a second chance. Society and Animals 9(2), 177-82.
32. Hinchliffe, S., Kearnes, M.B., Degen, M. and Whatmore, S. 2005: Urban wild things: A cosmopolitical experiment. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 23, 643-58.
33. Howell, P. 2000: Flush and the banditti. In Philo, C. and Wilbert, C., editors, Animal spaces, beastly places, London: Routledge, 35-55.
34. Ingold, T. 1988a: Introduction. In Ingold, T., editor, What is an animal, London: Unwin Hyman, 1-16.
35. Ingold T. 1988b: Notes on the foraging mode of production. In Ingold, T., Riches D. and Woodburn, J., editors, Hunters and gatherers volume 1: History, evolution and social change, Oxford: Berg, 269-85.
36. Ingold T. 1988c: The animal in the study of humanity. In Ingold, T., editor, What is an animal, London: Unwin, 84-99.
37. Ingold T. 1989: The social and environmental relations of human beings and other animals. In Standen, V. and Foley, R.A., editors, Comparative sociology: The behavioural ecology of humans and other mammals, London: Blackwell, 495-512.
38. Ingold T. 1990: An anthropologist looks at biology. Man NS 25(2), 208-29.
39. Ingold T. 1992: Culture and the perception of the environment. In Croll, E. and Parkin, D., editors, Bush base: Forest farm, culture environment and development, London: Routledge, 39-56.
40. Ingold T. 1993a: The temporality of the landscape. World Archaeology 25(2), 152-74.
41. Ingold T. 1993b: Tool-use, sociality and intelligence. In Gibson, K.R. and Ingold, T., editors, Tools, language and cognition in human evolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 429-45.
42. Ingold T. 1994: FromAtrust to domination: an alternative history of human-animal relations. In Manning, A. and Serpell, J., editors, Animals and human society, changing perspectives, London: Routledge, 1-22.
43. Ingold T. 1996a: Against the motion 'human worlds are culturally constructed'. In Ingold, T., editor, Key debates in anthropology, London: Routledge, 112-18.
44. Ingold T. 1996b: General introduction. In Ingold, T., editor, Key debates in anthropology, London: Routledge, 1-14.
45. Ingold T. 2000: The perception of the environment. London: Routledge.
46. IngoTd T. 2005: Epilogue: towards a politics of dwelling. Conservation and Society 3(2), 501-8.
47. Keely, B.L. 2004: Anthropomorphism, primatomorphism, mammalomorphism: understanding cross-species comparisons. Biology and Philosophy 19, 521-40.
48. Kennedy, J.S. 1992: The new anthropomorphism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49. Knoll, E. 1997: Dogs, darwinism and human sensibilities. In Mitchell, R.W., Thompson, N.S. and Lyn Miles, H., editors, Anthropomorphism, anecdotes and animals, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 12-21.
50. Latour, B. 1994: OP technical mediation: philosophy, sociology, genealogy. Common Knowledge 4, 29-64.
51. Latour B. 1999: On recalling ANT. In Law, J. and Hassard, J., editors, Actor network theory and after, Oxford: Blackwell, 15-25.
52. Law, C. 1999: After ANT: complexity, naming and topology. In Law, J. and Hassard, J., editors, Actor network theory and after, Oxford: Blackwell, 1-14.
53. Lee, N. and Brown, S. 1994:TOtherness and the actor network: the undiscovered continent. American Behavioural Scientist 36, 772-90.
54. Lorimer, H. 2006: Herding memories of humans and animals. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 24(4), 497-518.
55. Lulka, D. 2000P Animal geographies: place, politics and identity in the nature-culture borderlands. Professional Geographer 52(3), 589-90.
56. Lynn, W.S. 1998: Animals, ethics and geography. In Wolch, J. and Emel, J., editors, Animal geographies: Place, politics and identity in the nature-culture borderlands, London: Verso, 280-97.
57. Marvin, G. 2C01: Cultured killers: creating and representing foxhounds. Society and Animals 9(3), 273-92.
58. Marvin, G. 2005: Guest Sditor's introduction: seeing, looking, watching, observing nonhuman animals. Society and Animals 13(1), 1-11.
59. Matless, D. 2000: Versions of animal-human: Broadland, c1945-1970. In Philo, C. and Wilbert, C., editors, Animal spaces, beastly places, London: Routledge, 115-40.
60. Matless, D., Merchant, P. and Watkins, C. 2005: Animal landscapes: otters and wildfowl in England 1945-1970. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 30, 191-205.
61. McHugh, S. 2001: Video dog star: William Wegman, aesthetic agency, and the animal in experimental video art. Society and Animals 9(3), 230-51.
62. Michel, S.M. 1998: Golden eagles and the environmental politics of care. In Wolch, J. and Emel, J., editors, Animal geographies: Place, politics and identity in the nature-culture borderlands, London: Verso, 162-87.
63. Murdoch, J. 1997a:AInhuman/nonhuman/human: actor-network theory and the prospects for a nondualistic and symmetrical perspective on nature and society. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 15, 731-56.
64. Murdoch J. 1997b: Towards a geography of heterogeneous associations. Progress in Human Geography 21(3), 321-37.
65. Philo, C. 1998: Animals, geoNraphy, and the city: notes on inclusions and exclusions. In Wolch, J. and Emel, J., editors, Animal geographies: place, politics and identity in the nature-culture borderlands, London: Verso, 51-71.
66. Philo C. 2005: Spacing liveP and lively spaces: partial remarks on Sarah Whatmore's hybrid geographies. Antipode 37(4), 824-33.
67. Philo, C. and Wilbert, C.A2000: Animal spaces, beastly places: an introduction. In Philo, C. and Wilbert, C., editors, Animal spaces, beastly places, London: Routledge, 1-34.
68. Proctor, J.D. 1998: The spotted owl and the contested moral landscape of the pacific northwest. In Wolch, J. and Emel, J., editors, Animal geographies: Place, politics and identity in the nature-culture borderlands, London: Verso, 191-217.
69. Rees, A. 2001: Anthropomorphism, anthropocentrism, andanecdote:pRimatologistsonprimatology. Science, Technology, and Human Values 26(2), 227-47.
70. Risan, L.C. 2005: The boundary of animality. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 23, 787-73.
71. Robbins, P. 1998A Shrines and butchers: animals as deities, capital and meat in contemporary north India. In Wolch, J. and Emel, J., editors, Animal geographies: Place, politics and identity in the nature-culture borderlands, London: Verso, 218-40.
72. Said, E. 1978: Orientalism. New York: Random House.
73. Serpell, J.A. 2002: Anthropomorphism and anthropomorphic selection - beyond the 'cute response'. Society and Animals 10(4), 437-54.
74. Shapiro, K.J. 1997: A phenomenological approach to the study of nonhuman animals. In Mitchell, R.W., Thompson, N.S. and Lyn Miles, H., editors, Anthropomorphism, anecdotes and animals, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 277-95.
75. Smith, J.A. 2003: Beyond dLminance and affection: living with rabbits in post-humanist households. Society and Animals 11(2), 181-97.
76. Spada, E.C. 1997: Amorphism, mechanomorphism, and anthropomorphism. In Mitchell, R.W., Thompson, N.S. and Lyn Miles, H., editors, Anthropomorphism, anecdotes and animals, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 37-49.
77. Spivak, G. 1988: Can the subaltern speak? In Nelson, C. and Grossberg, L., editors, Marxism and the interpretation of culture, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 271-313.
78. Thrift, N. 1998: Steps to an ecology of place. In Massey, D., Allen, J. and Sarre, A., editors, Human geography today, Cambridge: Polity, 295-323.
79. Tuan, Y.F. 1984: DoTinance and affection: the making of pets. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
80. Whatmore, S. 2000: HeRerogeneous geographies: re-imagining the spaces of N/nature. In Cook, I., Crouch, D., Naylor, S. and Ryan, J., editors, Cultural turns/geographical turns, Harlow: Pearson, 265-72.
81. Whatmore S. 20N2: Hybrid geographies: natures cultures spaces. London: Sage.
82. Whatmore S. 20A5: Hybrid geographies: author's responses and reflections. Antipode 37(4), 842-5.
83. WhatmoRe, S. and Thorne, L. 1998: Wilderness: reconfiguring the geographies of wildlife. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 23, 435-54.
84. Whatmore S. 2000:SElephants on the move: spatial formations of wildlife exchange. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 18, 185-203.
85. Wilbert, C. 2000: Anti-this, against that, resistances along a human-nonhuman axis. In Sharp, J., Routledge, P., Philo, C. and Paddeston, R., editors, Entanglements of power- geographies of domination/resistance, London: Routledge, 238-55.
86. Wolch, J. 1998: Zoopolis. In Wolch, J. and Emel, J., editors, Animal geographies: Place, politics and identity in the nature-culture borderlands, London: Verso, 119-38.
87. Wolch J. 2002: Anima urbis. Progress in Human Geography 26(6), 721-42.
88. Wolch, J. and Emel, J. 1995: Bringing the animals back in. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 13(6), 632-6.
89. Wolch, J., Brownlow, A. and Lassiter, U. 2000: Constructing the animal worlds of inner-city Los Angeles. In Philo, C. and Wilbert, C., editors, Animal spaces, beastly places. London: Routledge, 71-97.
90. Wolch, J., West, J.R., West, K. and Gaines, T.E. 1995: Transspecies urban theory. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 13(6), 735-60.
91. Wolfe, C. 2003: In the shadow ofLWittgenstein's lion: language, ethics, and the question of the animal. In Wolfe, C., Animal rites: American culture, the discourse of species and posthumanist theory, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 44-97.
92. Woods, M. 2000: Fantastic Mr Fox? Representing animals in the hunting debate. In Philo, C. and Wilbert, C., editors, Animal spaces, beastly places, London: Routledge, 182-202.
93. Wylie, J. 2003: Landscape, perfArmance and dwelling: a Glastonbury case study. In Cloke, P., editor, Country visions, Harlow: Pearson Education, 136-57.
94. Wylie J. 2005: A sNngle day's walking: narrating self and landscape on the South West Coast Path. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 30, 234-47.
95. Wynne, C.D.L. 2004: The perils of anthropomorphism. Nature 428, 606.
96. Yarwood, R. and Evans, N. 2000: Taking stock of farm animals and rurality. In Philo, C. and Wilbert, C., editors, Animal spaces, beastly places, London: Routledge, 98-114.