IAEA/IDEAS intercomparison exercise on internal dose assessment

Radiation Protection Dosimetry

Volumn 125, Issue 1-4, 2007, Pages 56-60

  Doerfel, H ^a   Andrasi, A ^b   Cruz Suarez R ^c   Castellani, C M ^d   Hurtgen, C ^e   Marsh, J ^f   Zeger, J ^c  

^a KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b KFKI ATOMIC ENERGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Hungary)

^c INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY   (Austria)

^d ENEA   (Italy)

^e BELGIAN NUCLEAR RESEARCH CENTRE   (Belgium)

^f PUBLIC HEALTH ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMERICIUM 241; CESIUM 137; COBALT 60; GRAPHITE; IODINE 131; PLUTONIUM 239; RADIOISOTOPE; STRONTIUM 90; TRITIUM; URANIUM 234;

CONFERENCE PAPER; DOSIMETRY; HUMAN; INTERNET; METHODOLOGY; NEUTRON; NUCLEAR INDUSTRY; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RADIOACTIVE CONTAMINATION; URINARY EXCRETION; WORKPLACE; ARTICLE; BODY BURDEN; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EUROPE; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; QUALITY CONTROL; RADIATION MONITORING; RADIATION PROTECTION; RELATIVE BIOLOGIC EFFECTIVENESS; REPRODUCIBILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD;

BODY BURDEN; EUROPE; HUMANS; INTERNATIONALITY; INTERNET; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; QUALITY CONTROL; RADIATION MONITORING; RADIATION PROTECTION; RELATIVE BIOLOGICAL EFFECTIVENESS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 52249102063     PISSN: 01448420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncl540     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (8)

1. Gibson, J. A., Birchall, A., Bull, R. K., Henrichs, K., Iranzo, E., Lord, D. J., Piechowski, J., Sollett, E. Tancock, N. P. and Wernli, C. A European intercomparison of methods used for the assessment of internally deposited radionuclides. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 40, 245-257 (1992).
2. Gibson, J. A. B., Alvarez, A., Andrasi, A., Battersby, W. P., Birchall, A., Chevalier, C., Culot, J. P., Espinosa, A., Hurtgen, C., Malatova, I., Marsh, J. W., Phillips, R. F., Piechowski, J., Roberts, G. A. and Stewart, P. A. A second European laboratories intercomparison of methods used for the assessment of intakes of internally deposited radionuclides European Commission. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. (to be published).
3. Hui, T. E., Loesch, R. M., Raddatz, C., Fisher, D. R. and McDonald, J. C. An internal dose intercomparison study. Health Phys. 67 3), 217-225, (1994).
4. Hui, T. E., Loesch, R. M. and McDonald, J. C. The second internal dosimetry intercomparison study of the US Department of Energy. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 72(2), 131-138, (1997).
5. International Atomic Energy Agency. Intercomparison and Biokinetik Model Validation of Radionuclide Intake Assessment. (Results of a Co-ordinated Research Programme 1996-1998). IAEA-TECDOC-1071 (Vienna: IAEA) (1999).
6. Doerfel, H., Andrasi, A., Bailey, M. R., Birchall, A., Castellani, C.-M., Hurtgen, C., Jarvis N., Johansson, L., LeGuen, B. and Tarroni, G. Third European Intercomparison Exercise on Internal Dose Assessment, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe. Report FZKA 6457 (Germany: FZKA) (2000).
7. Doerfel, H., Andrasi, A., Bailey, M. R., Blanchardon, E., Cruz-Suarez, R., Berkovski, V., Castellani, C.-M., Hurtgen, C., LeGuen, B., Moatova, I., Marsh, J., Stather, J. and Zeger, J. General guidelines for the assessment of internal dose from monitoring data: Progress of the IDEAS project. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 125(1-4), 19-22 (2007) and in http://www.ideas-workshop.de/.
8. Wernli, C. and Eikenberg, J. Twenty-year follow-up of a Pu/Am inhalation case. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 125(1-4), 494-500 (2007).