Enhanced negative feedback responses in remitted depression

NeuroReport

Volumn 19, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 1045-1048

  Santesso, Diane L ^a   Steele, Katherine T ^a   Bogdan, Ryan ^a   Holmes, Avram J ^a   Deveney, Christen M ^a   Meites, Tiffany M ^a   Pizzagalli, Diego A ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Actionmonitoring; Anterior cingulate cortex; Depression; Executive function; Feedback related negativity; Negative bias; Punishment; Reinforcement learning; Remission

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HIGH RISK BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; LEARNING; MAJOR DEPRESSION; MALE; NEGATIVE FEEDBACK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PUNISHMENT; REMISSION; TASK PERFORMANCE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BRAIN MAPPING; CINGULATE GYRUS; CONFLICT; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; DEPRESSION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; TIME;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BRAIN MAPPING; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; DEPRESSION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; GYRUS CINGULI; HUMANS; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PROBABILITY LEARNING; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 52249100180     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283036e73     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Pizzagalli DA, Dillon DG, Bogdan R, Holmes AJ. Reward and punishment processing in the human brain: Clues from affective neuroscience and implications for depression research. In: Vartanian O, Mandel D, editors. Neuroscience of decision making. New York, NY: Psychology Press (in press).
2. Biringer E, Lundervold A, Stordal K, Mykletun A, Egeland J, Bottlender R, et al. Executive function improvement upon remission of recurrent unipolar depression. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2005; 255:373-380.
3. Paelecke-Habermann Y, Pohl J, Leplow B. Attention and executive functions in remitted major depression patients. J Affect Disord 2005; 89:125-135.
4. Elliot R, Sahakian BJ, Michael A, Paykel ES, Dolan RJ. Abnormal responses to feedback on planning and guessing tasks in patients with unipolar depression. Psychol Med 1998; 28:559-571.
5. Steele JD, Kumar P, Ebmeier KP. Blunted response to feedback information in depressive illness. Brain 2007; 130:2367-2374.
6. Gehring WJ, Willoughby AR. The medial frontal cortex and the rapid processing of monetary gains and losses. Science 2002; 295: 2279-2282.
7. Miltner WHR, Braun CH, Coles MGH. Event-related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time-estimation task: evidence for a "generic" neural system for error detection. J Cogn Neurosci 1997; 9:788-798.
8. Van Veen V, Holroyd CB, Cohen JD, Stenger VA, Carter CS. Errors without conflict: implications for performance monitoring theories of anterior cingulate cortex. Brain Cogn 2004; 56:267-276.
9. Tucker DM, Luu P, Frishkoff G, Quiring J, Poulsen C. Frontolimbic response to negative feedback in clinical depression. J Abnorm Psychol 2003; 112:667-678.
10. Ruchsow M, Hernberger B, Beschoner P, Gron G, Spitzer M, Kiefer M. Error processing in major depressive disorder: evidence from event-related potentials. J Psychiatric Res 2006; 40:37-46.
11. Scher CD, Ingram RE, Segal ZE. Cognitive reactivity and vulnerability: empirical evidence of construct activation and cognitive diatheses in unipolar depression. Clin Psychol Rev 2005; 25:487-510.
12. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW. Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders - Clinician Version (SCID-CV). Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Press, Inc; 1997.
13. Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. Beck Depression Inventory manual, 2nd ed. San Antonio, Texas: The Psychological Corporation; 1996.
14. Tripp G, Alsop B. Age-related changes in sensitivity to relative reward frequency. NZ J Psychol 1999; 28:30-36.
15. Pizzagalli DA, Jahn AL, O'Shea JP. Toward an objective characterization of an anhedonic phenotype: a signal-detection approach. Biol Psychiatry 2005; 57:319-327.
16. Watson D, Clark LA, Weber K, Assenheimer JS, Strauss ME, McCormick RA. Testing a tripartite model: I. Evaluating the convergent and divergent validity of anxiety and depression symptom scales. J Abnorm Psychol 1995; 104:3-14.
17. Carver CL, White TL. Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impeding reward and punishment: the BIS/BAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol 1994; 67:319-333.
18. Pascual-Marqui RD, Lehmann D, Koenig T, Kochi K, Merlo MC, Hell D, et al. Low resolution brain electromagnetic tomography LORETA functional imaging in acute, neuroleptic-naive, first-episode, productive schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res: Neuroimaging 1999; 90:169-179.
19. Pizzagalli DA, Lehmann D, Hendrick AM, Regard M, Pascual-Marqui RD, Davidson RJ. Affective judgments of faces modulate early activity (∼160 ms) within the fusiform gyri. Neuroimage 2002; 16:663-677.
20. Haeffel GJ, Abramson LY, Voelz ZR, Metalsky GI, Halberstadt L, Dykman BM, et al. Negative cognitive styles, dysfunctional attitudes, and the remitted depression paradigm: a search for the elusive cognitive vulnerability to depression factor among remitted depressives. Emotion 2005; 5:343-348.
21. Frank MJ, Seeberger L, O'Reilly RC. By carrot or by stick: cognitive reinforcement learning in Parkinsonism. Science 2004; 306:1940-1943.
22. Nieuwenhuis S, Holroyd CB, Mol N, Coles MG. Reinforcement-related brain potentials from medial frontal cortex: origins and functional significance. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2004; 28:441-448.
23. Holmes AJ, Pizzagalli DA. Spatiotemporal dynamics of error processing dysfunctions in major depressive disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2008; 65:179-188.
24. Beck AT, Rush AJ, Shaw BF, Emery G. Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: Guilford Press; 1979.
25. Rose EJ, Simonotto E, Ebmeier KP. Limbic over-activity in depression during preserved performance on the n-back task. Neuroimage 2006; 29:203-215.
26. Santesso DL, Dillon DG, Birk JL, Holmes AJ, Goetz E, Bogdan R, Pizzagalli DA. Individual differences in reinforcement learning: behavioral, electrophysiological, and neuroimaging correlates. Neuroimage (in press).