Nonlinear image representation using divisive normalization

26th IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Lyu, Siwei ^a   Simoncelli, Eero P ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IMAGE CONTRASTS; IMAGE REPRESENTATIONS; ITERATIVE INVERSION; LINEAR COMBINATION; MULTI SCALING; PHOTOGRAPHIC IMAGING; SQUARE ROOTING; STATISTICAL DEPENDENCIES; STATISTICAL PROPERTIES; VISUAL SYSTEMS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CHLORINE COMPOUNDS; COMPUTER VISION; FEATURE EXTRACTION; IMAGING SYSTEMS; IMAGING TECHNIQUES; ITERATIVE METHODS; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOGRAPHY; PHOTORESISTS; STATISTICAL METHODS;

IMAGE PROCESSING;

EID: 52249097028     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2008.4587821     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. D. F. Andrews and C. L. Mallows. Scale mixtures of normal distributions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 36(1):99-102, 1974. 2
2. M. Bethge. Factorial coding of natural images: How effective are linear models in removing higher-order dependencies? J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 23(6):1253-1268, June 2006. 1
3. N. Bonnier and E. P. Simoncelli. Locally adaptive multiscale contrast optimization. In Proc 12th IEEE Int'l Conf on Image Proc, volume I, pages 949-952, Genoa, Italy, September 11-14 2005. IEEE Computer Society. 5, 6
4. R. W. Buccigrossi and E. P. Simoncelli. Image compression via joint statistical characterization in the wavelet domain. 8(12):1688-1701, 1999. 1
5. P. J. Burt. Fast filter transforms for image processing. Comp. Graph. Image Proc., 16:20-51, 1981. 1
6. R. Fattal, D. Lischinski, and M. Werman. Gradient domain high dynamic range compression. In ACMSIGGRAPH, 2002. 5, 6
7. D. J. Field. Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 4(12):2379-2394, 1987. 1
8. J. Foley. Human luminence pattern mechanisims: Masking experimants require a new model. J. of Opt. Soc. of Amer. A, 11(6):1710-1719, 1994. 1, 4, 5
9. W. S. Geisler and D. G. Albrecht. Cortical neurons: Isolation of contrast gain control. Vision Research, 8:1409-1410, 1992. 1
10. J. M. Gluckman. Higher order pyramids: an early vision representation. In European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2006. 1
11. R. M. Gray. Toeplitz and circulant matrices: A review. Foundations and Trends in Communications and Information Theory, 2(3):155-239, 2006. 3
12. D. J. Heeger. Normalization of cell responses in cat striate cortex. Visual neural science, 9:181-198, 1992. 1
13. L. Landweber. An iterative formula for Freholm integral equations of the first kind. Amer. J. Math, 73:615-624, 1951. 3
14. Y. Li, L. Sharan, and E. H. Adelson. Compressing and companding high dynamic range images with subband architectures. In ACM Transactions on Graphics (Siggraph Proceedings), volume 24, pages 836-844, 2005. 5, 6
15. J. Malo, I. Epifanio, R. Navarro, and E. P. Simoncelli. Non-linear image representation for efficient perceptual coding. IEEE Trans. on Image Proc., 15(1):68-80, January 2006. 1, 3, 6
16. J. Malo, R. Navarro, I. Epifanio, F. Ferri, and J. Artigas. Non-linear invertible representation for joint statistical and perceptual fea ture representation. Lect. Not. Comp. Sci., 1876:658-667, 2000. 1
17. W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery. Numerical Recipes. Cambridge, 2nd edition, 2002. 3
18. S. Roth and M. Black. Fields of experts: A framework for learning image priors. volume 2, pages 860-867, 2005. 2
19. O. Schwartz and E. P. Simoncelli. Natural signal statistics and sensory gain control. Nature Neuroscience, 4(8):819-825, August 2001. 1, 3
20. E. P. Simoncelli. Statistical models for images: Compression, restoration and synthesis. In Proc 31st Asilomar Conf on Signals, Systems and Computers, volume 1, pages 673-678, Pacific Grove, CA, November 2-5 1997. IEEE Computer Society. 1, 2
21. E. P. Simoncelli and W. T. Freeman. The steerable pyramid: A flexible architecture for multi-scale derivative computation. volume III, pages 444-447, 1995. 2
22. J. L. Starck, F.Murtagh, E. Candes, and D. L. Donoho. Gray and color image contrast enhancement by the curvelet transform. pages 706-717, 2003. 5
23. Y. Teh, M. Welling, S. Osinderoi, and G. Hinton. Energy-based models for sparse overcomplete representations. 4:1235-1260, 2003. 2, 3
24. P. C. Teo and D. J. Heeger. Perceptual image distortion. In IEEE Int'l. Conf. on Image Proc., pages 982-986, 1994. 1, 4
25. R. Valerio, E. P. Simoncelli, and R. Navarro. Directly invertible nonlinear divisive normalization pyramid for image representation. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2849, pages 331-340. Springer, 2003. 1
26. Z. Wang, A. C. Bovik, H. R. Sheikh, and E. P. Simoncelli. Perceptual image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity. tip, 13(4):600-612, 2004. 5
27. A. Watson and J. Solomon. A model of visual contrast gain control and patern masking. J. Opt. Soc. Amer. A, pages 2379-2391, 1997. 1, 4
28. B. Wegmann and C. Zetzsche. Statistical dependencies between orientation filter outputs used in human vision based image code. In Proc Visual Comm. And Image Proc., volume 1360, pages 909-922, 1990. 1
29. Y. Weiss and W. T. Freeman. What makes a good model of natural images? In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2007. CVPR '07. IEEE Conference on, 2007. 2