Learning a geometry integrated image appearance manifold from a small training set

26th IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Xu, Yilei ^a   Roy Chowdhury, Amit K ^a  

^a University of California Riverside   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; COMPUTER VISION; FEATURE EXTRACTION; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; STATISTICAL METHODS; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

3-D STRUCTURES; 3D GEOMETRY; 3D SURFACES; BASIS FUNCTIONS; GEOMETRICAL INFORMATIONS; GEOMETRICAL MODELLING; IMAGE REPRESENTATIONS; LOW-DIMENSIONAL MANIFOLDS; OBJECT APPEARANCE; SMALL TRAINING; STATISTICAL LEARNING METHODS; TANGENT SPACES; TRAINING SETS;

SET THEORY;

EID: 52249096822     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2008.4587365     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. S. Baker and I. Matthews. Lucas-kanade 20 years on: A unifying framework. International Journal of Computer Vision, 56(3):221-255, February 2004.
2. R. Basri and D. Jacobs. Lambertian Reflectance and Linear Subspaces. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 25(2):218-233, February 2003.
3. V. Blanz and T. Vetter. Face recognition based on fitting a 3D morphable model. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 25(9):1063-1074, Sep. 2003.
4. T. Cootes, G. Edwards, and C. Taylor. Active Appearance Models. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 23(6):681-685, June 2001.
5. A. Elgammal and C. Lee. Separating style and content on a nonlinear manifold. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages I: 478-485, 2004.
6. G. D. Hager and P. Belhumeur. Efficient Region Tracking With Parametric Models of Geometry and Illumination. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 20(10):1025-1039, 1998.
7. G. W. J.-M. F. Hua Yang, Marc Pollefeys and A. Ilie. Differential Camera Tracking through Linearizing the Local Appearance Manifold. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2007.
8. L. D. Lathauwer, B. D. Moor, and J. Vandewalle. A Multillinear Singular Value Decomposition. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl., 21(4):1253-1278, 2000.
9. K. Lee, J. Ho, M. Yang, and D. Kriegman. Video-based face recognition using probabilistic appearance manifolds. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages I: 313-320, 2003.
10. I. Matthews and S. Baker. Active appearance models revisited. International Journal of Computer Vision, 60(2):135-164, November 2004.
11. R. Ramamoorthi and P. Hanrahan. A signal-processing framework for inverse rendering. In E. Fiume, editor, SIGGRAPH 2001, Computer Graphics Proceedings, pages 117-128. ACM Press / ACM SIGGRAPH, 2001.
12. J. B. Tenenbaum and W. T. Freeman. Separating style and content with bilinear models. Neural Computation, 12(6):1247-1283, 2000.
13. M. Vasilescu and D. Terzopoulos. Multilinear Independent Components Analysis. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2005.
14. D. Vlasic, M. Brand, H. Pfister, and J. Popovic. Face transfer with multilinear models. ACM Transactions on Graphics( TOG), pages 426-433, 2005.
15. H. Wang and N. Ahuja. Facial expression decomposition. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2:958-965, 2003.
16. Y. Xu and A. Roy-Chowdhury. Integrating Motion, Illumination and Structure in Video Sequences, With Applications in Illumination-Invariant Tracking. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, In Press.
17. Y. Xu and A. Roy-Chowdhury. Inverse compositional estimation of 3d motion and lighting in dynamic scenes. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intellitence, In Press.