Public geographies: Taking stock

Progress in Human Geography

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 834-844

  Fuller, Duncan ^a  

^a NORTHUMBRIA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Public geographies; Public sociology; Strategy; Style; Substance

Indexed keywords

HUMAN GEOGRAPHY; SOCIAL THEORY;

EID: 52249091421     PISSN: 03091325     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0309132507086884     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. Acker, J. 2005: Comments on Burawoy on public sociology. Critical Sociology 31, 327-31.
2. Amin, A., Massey, D. and Thrift, N. 2000: Cities for the many not the few. Bristol: Policy Press.
3. Aronowitz, S. 2005: Comments on Michael Burawoy's 'The critical turn to public sociology'. Critical Sociology 31, 333-38.
4. Attwood, R. 2007: Academics told to push intellectual credentials. The Times Higher Education Supplement 13 April: 1.
5. Baiocchi, G. 2005: InFerrogating connections: from public criticisms to critical publics in Burawoy's public sociology. Critical Sociology 31, 339-351.
6. Berry, B. 1972: More on relevance and policy analysis. Area 4, 77-80.
7. Blomley, N. 1994: Activism and the academy. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 12, 383-85.
8. Bonnett, A. 2003: Geography aC the world discipline: connecting popular and academic geographical imaginations. Area 35, 155-63.
9. Brewer, R.M. 2005: Response to Burawoy's commentary: 'The critical turn to public sociology'. Critical Sociology 31, 353-59.
10. Bunge,GW. 1971: Fitzgerald: geography of a revolution. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.
11. Bunge, W. 1973a: Ethics and logic in geography. In Chorley, R.J., editor, Directions in geography, London: Methuen, 317-31.
12. Bunge, W. 1973b: The geography of human survival. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 63, 275-95.
13. Bunge, W. 1977: The first years of the Detroit Geographical Expedition: a personal report. In Peet, R., editor, Radical geography, London: Methuen, 31-39.
14. Bunge, W. 1979: Perspective on theoretical geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 69, 169-74.
15. Burawoy, M. 2003: Public sociologies. Social Forces 82, 1603-18.
16. Burawoy, M. 20C4a: Public sociologies: contradictions, dilemmas and possibilities. Social Forces 82, 1-16.
17. Burawoy, M. 2004b: The world needs public sociology. Paper presented at the Universities of Oslo, Bergen and Tromsø, 24 May-2 June.
18. Burawoy, M. 2005a: 20F4 presidential address: for public sociology. American Sociological Review 70, 4-28.
19. Burawoy, M. 2005b: 2004 American Sociological Association Presidential address: For public sociology. British Journal of Sociology 56, 259-94.
20. Burawoy, M. 2005c: The critical turn to public sociology. Critical Sociology 31, 313-26.
21. Castree, N. 1999: 'Out there'? 'In here'? Domesticating critical geography. Area 31, 81-86.
22. Castree, N. 2000a: What kind of critical geography for what kind of politics ? Environment and Planning A 32, 2091-95.
23. Castree, N. 2000b: Professionalization, activism and the university: whither 'critical geography?'. Environment and Planning A 32, 955-70.
24. Castree,BN. 2002: Observations: border geography. Area 34, 103-12.
25. Castree, N. 2003: Reclaiming pedagogy. Geoforum 34, 283-85.
26. CGstree, N. 2005: Forum: geography and environmental policy. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS 30, 271-72.
27. Castree, N. 2006: Geography's new public intellectuals. Antipode 38, 396-412.
28. Champion, J. 2003: Seeing the past: Simon Schama's 'A History of Britain' and public history. History Workshop Journal 56, 153-74.
29. Chilvers, J., Cook, I., Griffiths, H. and Morris, R. 2006: 'New public geographies?' Paper presented in the Public Sociologies? Public Geographies? session of the RGS-IBG 2006 Annual Conference.
30. Chouinard, V.I1994: Radical geography: is all that's Left right? Society and Space 12, 2-5.
31. Clifford, N.J. 2002W The future of geography: when the whole is less than the sum of its parts. Geoforum 33, 431-36.
32. Cumbers, A. and Routledge, P. 2004: Alternative geographical imaginations: Introduction. Antipode 36, 818-28.
33. Cutter S., Graf, W. and Golledge, R. 2002: The big questions in Geography. Professional Geographer 54, 305-17.
34. de Blij, H. 2005: Commentary on the role of geography in public debate. Progress in Human Geography 29, 167-73.
35. Diamond, J. 1997: Guns, germs, and steel. New York: Norton.
36. DiamHnd, J. 2005: Collapse: how societies choose to fail or survive. London: Penguin.
37. Dicken, P. 2004: Geographers and globalization: (yet) another missed boat? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS 29, 5-26.
38. Dickinson, J.P. and Clarke, C.G. 1972: Relevance and the 'newest geography'. Area 3, 25-27.
39. Eden, S. 2005: Green, goldLand grey geography: legitimating academic and policy expertise. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS 30, 282-86.
40. Eriksen, T.H. 200T: Engaging anthropology: the case for a public presence. Oxford: Berg.
41. Fry, S. 2006: The future's in the past. The Observer, 9 July. Available from http://observer.guardian.co.uk/review/story/0,,1815961,00.html
42. Fuller, D. 1999: Part of the action, or 'going native'? Learning to cope with the 'politics of integration'. Area 31, 221-28.
43. Fuller, D. and Askins, K. 2007 a: The discomforting rise of 'public geographies' - a 'public' conversation. Antipode 39, 4, 579-601.
44. Fuller, D. and Askins, K. 2007b: The discomforting rise of 'public geographies - a 'public' conversation. Extended unpublished version available from http://northumbria.ac.uk/sd/academic/sas/staffbiog/geog/ duncanf/
45. Fuller, D. and Kitchin, R. 2004: Radical theory/critical praxis: academic geography beyond the academy? In Fuller, D. and Kitchen, R., editors, Critical theory/radical praxis: Making a difference beyond the academy?, Vernon and Victoria, BC, Canada: Praxis (e)Press, 1-20.
46. Ghamari-Tabrizi, B. 2005: Can Burawoy make everybody happy? Comments on public sociology. Critical Sociology 31, 361-69.
47. Gladwell, M. H000: The tipping point: how little things make a big difference. London: Little, Brown and Company.
48. Gladwell, M. 2005: Blink: The power of thinking without thinking. London: Little, Brown and Company.
49. Gould, P. 1985: The geographer at work. Oxford: Blackwell.
50. Gould, P. 19T0: Fire in the rain: the democratic consequences of Chernobyl. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
51. Gould, P. 1A93: The slow plague: a geography of the AIDS pandemic. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
52. Gould, P. 1999: Becoming a geographer. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.
53. Gregory, D. 2004: The colonial present. Oxford: Blackwell.
54. Harvey, D. 1972: Revolutionary and counter-revolutionary theory in geography and the problem of ghetto formation. Antipode 4, 1-2.
55. Harvey, D. 1974: What kind of geography for what kind of public policy? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS 63, 18-24.
56. Harvey, D. 2003: The new imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
57. Hinchliffe, S. 2006: 10 things about publicly challenged geographies. Paper presented at the Public Geographies Symposium, University of Birmingham, School of Geography, 6 April.
58. Jacoby, R. 1987: The last intellectuals: American culture in the age of academe. New York: Basic Books.
59. James, A., Gray, M. and Martin, R. 2004: (Expanding) The role of geography in public policy. Environment and Planning A 36, 1901-905.
60. Johnston, R.J. 1984: The world is our oyster. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS 9, 443-59.
61. Johnston, R. and Plummer, R. 2005: What is policy-orientated research? Environment and Planning A 37, 1521-26.
62. Katz-Fishman, WA and Scott, J. 2005: Comments on Burawoy: a view from the bottom-up. Critical Sociology 31, 371-74.
63. Kelley, R.I1978: Public history: its origins, nature, and prospects. Public Historian 1, 16-28.
64. Kitchin, R. and Fuller, D. 2005: The academic's guide to publishing. London: Sage.
65. Kitchin, R.M. and Hubbard, P.J., editors 1999: Research, action and 'critical' geographies. Area 31, 195-246.
66. Lamphere, L. 2003: The perils and prospects for an engaged anthropology. Social Anthropology 11, 153-68.
67. Levitt, S.D. and Dubner, S.J. 2006: Freakonomics. London: Penguin.
68. Martin, R. 2001: GeograThy and public policy: the case of the missing agenda. Progress in Human Geography 25, 189-210.
69. Massey, D. 2001: Geography on the agenda. Progress in Human Geography 25, 5-17.
70. Maxey, I. 1999: Beyond boundaries? Activism, academia, reflexivity and research. Area 31, 199-208.
71. Monmonier, M.S. 1996: How to lie with maps. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
72. Monmonier, M.S. 2001: Bushmanders and bullwinkles: How politicians manipulate electronic maps and census data to win elections. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
73. Murphy, A.B. 2006: Enhancing geography's role in public debate. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 96, 1-13.
74. Murphy, A., de Blij, H., Gilmore, R.W., Turner, B.L. III and Gregory, D. 2005: Forum on the role of geography in public debate. Progress in Human Geography 29, 165-93.
75. Nielsen, F.R2004: The vacant 'we': remarks on public sociology. Social Forces 82, 1-9.
76. Owens, S. 2005: Making a difference? Some perspectives on environmental research and policy. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS 30, 287-92.
77. Peck,GJ. 1999: Editorial: grey geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS 24, 131-35.
78. Posner, R. 2002:APublic intellectuals: a study of decline. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
79. Peet, R. 1969: The spatial expansion of commercial agriculture in the nineteenth century: A von Thünen explanation. Economic Geography 45, 283-301.
80. Peet R. 2003: Unholy trinity. London: Zed Books.
81. Prince, H.C. 1971: America! America? Views on a melting pot 1. Questions of social relevance. Area 3, 150-53.
82. Recken, S.L. 199A: Doing public history: a look at the how, but especially the why. American Quarterly 45, 187-94.
83. Retort 2004: Afflicted powers: Capital and spectacle in a new age of war. London: Verso.
84. Routledge, P. 1996: The third space as critical engagement. Antipode 28, 399-419.
85. Ryant, C. 1986: Public history aH a popular movement: how public? How popular? The Journal of Popular Culture 20, 63-68.
86. Scarpino,RP.V. 1994: Common ground: reflections on the past, present, and future of public history and the NCPH. The Public Historian 16(3), 11-21.
87. Small, H., editor 2002: The public intellectual. Oxford: Blackwell, 1-18.
88. Smith, N. 2005: The endgame of globalization. New York: Routledge.
89. Social ProblemA 2004: Public sociologies: a symposium from Boston College. Social Problems 151, 103-30.
90. Staeheli, L.A. and Mitchell, D. 2005: The complex politics of relevance in geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 95, 357-72.
91. Tittle, C. 2004: The arrogance of public sociology. Social Forces 82, 1-6.
92. Turner, B.-L. III 2005: Geography's profile in public debate. Professional Geographer 57, 462-67.
93. Urry, J. 2005: The good news and the bad news. Critical Sociology 31, 375-78.
94. Ward, K. 2005: GeographA and public policy: a recent history of policy-relevance. Progress in Human Geography 29, 310-19.
95. Ward, K. 2006: GeographT and public policy: towards public geographies. Progress in Human Geography 30, 495-503.
96. Warner, M. 2002: Publics and counter-publics. New York: Zone.
97. Wills, J. 2002: PNlitical economy III: neoliberal chickens, Seattle and geography. Progress in Human Geography 26, 90-100.