Context-sensitive mobile services for police officers: A re-assessment of TAM

Proceedings - 7th International Conference on Mobile Business, ICMB 2008, Creativity and Convergence

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 191-200

  Bouwman, Harry ^a   Van De Wijngaert, Lidwien ^b   De Vos, Henny ^c  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c TELEMATICA INSTITUUT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION DEVICES; COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES; CONJOINT ANALYSIS; CONTEXT-SENSITIVE; CONTEXTUAL FACTORS; INDIVIDUAL CHARACTERISTICS; INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES; MEDIA CHOICE; MOBILE APPLICATIONS; MOBILE BUSINESS; MOBILE SERVICES; MOBILE TECHNOLOGIES; POLICE OFFICERS; TASK-TECHNOLOGY FIT;

COMMUNICATION; MOBILE COMPUTING; TECHNOLOGY; TELECOMMUNICATION; TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT;

LAW ENFORCEMENT;

EID: 52149121128     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICMB.2008.18     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Bagozzi, R.P. and Yi Y. 1988. On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
2. Bouwman, H., B. Van den Hooff, L van de Wijngaert, and J. Van Dijk (2005). Information and Communication Technology in Organizations. London: Sage. ISBN 1-4129-0089-1, pp. 223
3. Daft, R.L. and Lengel, R.H. (1984) 'Information Richness: a New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organizational Design', in L.L. Cummings and B.M. Staw (eds), Research in Organizational Behavior 6: 191-133. Greenwich CT: JAI Press.
4. Davis, F.D. (1989), 'Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use and User Acceptance of Information Technology', MIS Quarterly 13, 319-340.
5. Dishaw, M. & D. Strong (1999). Extending the Technology Accepatnce Model with Task-Technology Fit constructs. Information & Management, Vol 36, pp. 9-21.
6. Elias, M. (1997). Onder dienders: onstuimig en beklemmend: de wereld van de politie. Uitgeverij Balans.
7. Fornell, C. & Larcker D.F. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
8. Fulk, J., Schmitz, J. & Steinfield, C.W. (1990) 'A Social Influence Model of Technology Use', in J. Fulk and C.W. Steinfield (eds), Organizations and Communication Technology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. pp. 117-142.
9. Goodhue, D. & R. Thompson (1995). Task technology Fit and Individual Performance. MISQuarterly, Vol 19, no. 2 pp. 213-236
10. Gustafsson, J. Hermann, A. & Huber, F. (2003) 'Conjoint Analysis as an instrument of market research practice', in J. Gustafsson, A. Hermann and F. Huber (eds), Conjoint measurement, methods and applications. Berlin: Springer. pp. 5-46.
11. Hox, J. (2002). Multilevel Analysis, Techniques and Applications. London: Erlbaum.
12. ISO 9241-11 (1998) Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) - Part 11: Guidance on usability. www.iso.org
13. Jöreskog, K.G. and D. Sörbom (1996) LISREL 8 User's Reference Guide. Scientific Software International.
14. Legris, P., Ingham, J. & Collerette, P. (2003) 'Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model', Information & Management, 40(3): 191-204
15. López-Nicolas, C, F. Molina Castillo and H. Bouwman (forthcoming). An assessment of advanced mobile services acceptance: contributions from tam and diffusion theory models..
16. Louviere, J.J. (1988). Analysing Decision Making Metrix Conjoint Analysis. Newbury Park: Sage.
17. Orlikowski, W.J. (1992) 'The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations', Organization Science, 3(3): 398-427.
18. Pavlou, P. (2003). Consumer Acceptance of E-commerce: Integrating Trust and Risk with the Technology Acceptance Model, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 101-134.
19. Pica, D. and C. Sørensen (2004). On Mobile Technology in context: exploring police work. Journal of Computing and Information technology, Vol 12, p. 287-295
20. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovation. New York: The Free Press
21. Rossi, P. H., & Anderson, A. B. (1982). The Factorial Survey Approach: An Introduction. In P. H. Rossi, and S. L. Nock (Eds.), Measuring Social Judgments (pp. 15-67). Beverly Hills: Sage.
22. Schepers, J. & M. Wetzels (2007). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderating effects. Information & Management. Vol. 44, pp. 90-103.
23. Stol, W. Ph., Ph. van Wijk, G. Vogel, B. Foederer, and L. van Heel (2004), Politiestraatwerk in Nederland: Noodhulp en Gebiedswerk [Police streetwork in The Netherlands]. Apeldoorn / Zeist: Nederlandse Politie Academie / Kerkebosch.
24. Stijnman G., Lugard F., Slotema M. and Lith M. (2004). Evaluatie Pilot Mobiel Blauw. Technisch Rapport. Regiopolitie Amsterdam Amstelland.
25. Tapia, A., and S. Sawyer (2005). Beliefs about computing: Contrary evidence from a study of mobile computing use among criminal justice personnel. In: C. Sørensen, Y. Yoo, K. Lyytinnen, and J.I. DeGross (Eds). Designing ubiquitous information environments: socio-technical issues and challenges. Springer
26. Van de Wijngaert, L. and H. Bouwman (2008) Would You share? Predicting the potential use of a new technology. Telematics & Informatics
27. Van den Hooff, B. (1994). Incorporating Electronic Mail. Amsterdam: Otto Cramwinckel Publisher.
28. Venkatesh, V., M. Morris, G. Davis and F. Davis (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Towards a Unified View. MIS Quarterly Vol. 27, no. 3, p. 425-477.