Modeling robustness tradeoffs in yeast cell polarization induced by spatial gradients

PLoS ONE

Volumn 3, Issue 9, 2008, Pages

  Chou, Ching Shan ^a   Nie, Qing ^a   Yi, Tau Mu ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PHEROMONE; MEMBRANE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CELL POLARITY; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; POSITIVE FEEDBACK; SIMULATION; STEADY STATE; YEAST CELL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CYTOLOGY; DIFFUSION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; YEAST;

CELL POLARITY; DIFFUSION; FEEDBACK, PHYSIOLOGICAL; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; YEASTS;

EID: 52149120381     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003103     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Thompson DW (1961) On Growth and Form. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2. Drubin DG, Nelson WJ (1996) Origins of cell polarity. Cell 84: 335-344.
3. Pruyne D, Bretscher A (2000) Polarization of cell growth in yeast: I. Establishment and maintenance of polarity states. J Cell Sci 113: 365-375.
4. Turing AM (1952) The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond B237: 37-72.
5. Meinhardt H (1982) Models of biological pattern formation. London: Academic Press.
6. Iglesias PA, Levchenko A (2002) Modeling the cell's guidance system. Science's STKE 9: RE12.
7. Krishnan J, Iglesias PA (2004) Uncovering directional sensing: where are we headed? Syst Biol 1: 54-61.
8. Devreotes P, Janetopoulos C (2003) Eukaryotic chemotaxis: Distinctions betweeri directional sensing and polarization. J Biol Chem 278: 20445-20448.
9. Meinhardt H (1999) Orientation of chemotactic cells and growth cones: Models and mechanisms. J Cell Sci 112: 2867-2874.
10. Dawes AT, Edelstein-Keshet L (2007) Phosphoinositides and Rho proteins spatially regulate actin polymerization to initiate and maintain directed movement in a one-dimensional model of a motile cell. Biophys J 92: 744-768.
11. Narang A (2006) Spontaneous polarization in eukaryotic gradient sensing: A mathematical model based on mutual inhibition of frontness and backness pathways. J Theor Biol 240: 538-553.
12. Levchenko A, Iglesias PA (2002) Models of eukaryotic gradient sensing: Application to chemotaxis of amoebae and neutrophils. Biophys J 82: 50-63.
13. Postma M, Haastert PJMV (2001) A diffusion-translocation model for gradient sensing by chemotactic cells. Biophys J 81: 1314-1323.
14. Maly VI, Wiley HS, Lauffenburger DA (2004) Self-organization of polarized cell signaling via autocrine circuits: Computational model analysis. Biophys J 86.
15. Haugh JM, Schneider IC (2004) Spatial analysis of 3′ phosphoinositide signaling in living fibroblasts: I. Uniform stimulation model and bounds on dimensionless groups. Biophys J 86: 589-598.
16. Gamba A, Candia Ad, Talia SD, Coniglio A, Bussolino F, et al. (2005) Diffusion-limited phase separation in eukaryotic chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 16927-16932.
17. Skupsky R, Losert W, Nossal RJ (2005) Distinguishing modes of eukaryotic gradient sensing. Biophys J 89: 2806-2823.
18. Maree AFM, Jilkine A, Dawes AT, Grieneisen VA, Edelstein-Keshet L (2006) Polarization and movement of keratocytes: A multiscale modeling approach. Bull Math Biol 68: 1169-1211.
19. Yi T-M, Chen S, Chou C-S, Nie Q (2007) Modeling yeast cell polarization induced by pheromone gradients. J Stat Phys 128: 193-207.
20. Yi T-M, Andrews BW, Iglesias PA (2007) Control analysis of bacterial chemotaxis signaling. Methods in Enzymology 422: 123-140.
21. Butty AC, Perrinjaquet N, Petit A, Jaquenoud M, Segall JE, et al. (2002) A positive feedback loop stabilizes the guanine-nucleotide exchange factor Cdc24 at sites of polarization. Embo J 21: 1565-1576.
22. Angeli D, Ferrell JE Jr, Sontag ED (2004) Detection of multistability, bifurcations, and hysteresis in a large class of biological positive-feedback systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 1822-1827.
23. Onsum M, Rao CV (2007) A mathematical model for neutrophil gradient sensing and polarization, PLoS Comp Biol 3: e36.
24. Horowitz P, Hill W (1989) The Art of Electronics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25. Jacobson K, Ishihara A, Inman R (1987) Lateral diffusion of proteins in membranes. Ann Rev Physiol 49: 163-175.
26. Marco E, Wedlich-Soldner R, Li R, Altschuler SJ, Wu LF (2007) Endocytosis optimizes the dynamic localization of membrane proteins that regulate cortical polarity. Cell 129: 411-422.
27. Wedlich-Soldner R, Altschuler S, Wu L, Li R (2003) Spontaneous cell polarization through actomyosin-based delivery of the Cdc42 GTPase. Science 299: 1231-1235.
28. Brandman O Jr, JEF, Li R, Meyer T (2005) Interlinked fast and slow positive feedback loops drive reliable cell decisions. Science 310: 496-498.
29. Gulli M-P, Jaquenoud M, Shimada Y, Niederhauser G, Wiget P, et al. (2000) Phosphorylation of the Cdc42 exchange factor Cdc24 by the PAK-like kinase Cla4 may regulate polarized growth in yeast. Mol Cell 6: 1155-1167.
30. Valdez-Taubas J, Pelham HRB (2003) Slow diffusion of proteins in the yeast plasma membrane allows polarity to be maintained by endocytic cycling. Curr Biol 13: 1636-1640.
31. Lauffenburger DA, Linderman JJ (1993) Receptors: Models for Binding, Trafficking, and Signaling. New York: Oxford University Press.
32. Andrews BW, Yi T-M, Iglesias PA (2006) Optimal noise filtering in the chemotactic response of E. coli. PLoS Comp Biol 2.
33. Briggs WL, Henson VE, McCormick SF (2000) A Multigrid Tutorial. Philadelphia: SIAM.
34. Leeuw T, Fourest-Lieuvin A, Wu C, Chenevert J, Clark K, et al. (1995) Pheromone response in yeast: Association of Bem1p with proteins of the MAP kinase cascade and actin. Science 270: 1210-1213.