Interoperable language and model management using the UEML approach

Proceedings of the 2006 International Workshop on Global Integrated Model Management, GaMMa 2006, co-located with the 28th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2006

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 35-41

  Opdahl, Andreas L ^a   Berio, Giuseppe ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

Author keywords

Bunge's ontology; BWW model; Interoperability; Model management; Modelling language management; Separation of reference; UEML

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; INTEROPERABILITY; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

BWW MODEL; ENTERPRISE MODELLING; INTEGRATED MODELING; INTERMEDIATE LANGUAGES; LANGUAGE MANAGEMENT; MODEL INTEROPERABILITY; MODEL MANAGEMENT; UEML;

MODELING LANGUAGES;

EID: 52149117633     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1138304.1138312     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Austin, J.L. (1962). How to do Things with Words. Clarendon Press.
2. Berio G. (2005) UEML: A further step. In Knowledge Sharing in the Integrated Enterprise: Interoperability Strategies for the Enterprise Architect (IFIP International Federation for Information Processing Series, Vol. 183) Bernus, Peter; Fox, Mark (Eds.), pp. 79-92. ISBN: 0-387-26608-9.
3. Berio G., Anaya V., and Ortiz A. (2004). Supporting Enterprise Integration through a Unified Enterprise Modeling Language. In Proc. of EMOI 2004 (Enterprise Modelling and Ontologies for Interoperability) (Janis Grundspenkis, Marite Kirikova Eds.), joint with CAiSE04, Riga Technical University, 3: 165-176.
4. Berio, G., Opdahl, A., Anaya, V. and Dassisti, M. (2005). Deliverable DEM1. www.interop-noe.org.
5. Berio G., Petit M. (2003). Enterprise Modelling and the UML: (sometimes) a conflict without a case. In Proceedings of 10th ISPE International Conference on Concurrent Engineering -Enhanced Interoperable Systems (R.Jardim-Golçalves, J.Cha, A Steiger-Garçao Eds), Madeira Island, 26-30 June, pp. 787-794. A.A. Balkema Publishers.
6. Bernstein, P.A. (2003). Applying Model Management to Classical Meta Data Problems. In Proc. CIDR 2003, pp. 209-220.
7. Bunge, M. (1977). Treatise on Basic Philosophy: Vol. 3: Ontology I: The Furniture of the World. Boston:Reidel.
8. Bunge, M. (1979). Treatise on Basic Philosophy: Vol. 4: Ontology II: A World of Systems. Boston:Reidel.
9. Clark, T., Evans, A., Sammut, P., Willians, J. (2004). Applied Metamodelling: A Foundation for Language Driven Development. Accessible at http://www.xactium.com.
10. Dallons, G., Heymans, P. and Pollet, I. (2005). A Template-based Analysis of GRL. In Proc. of EMMSAD'05 (CAiSE∗05), Tenth International Workshop on Exploring Modeling Methods in Systems Analysis and Design, pp. 493-504.
11. Doumeingts, G. Vallespir, B. Zanettin, B. and Chen, D. (1992). GIM, GRAI Integrated Methodology-A methodology for designing CIM systems, Version 1.0, Unnumbered report, LAP/GRAI, University of Bordeaux 1, France.
12. EXTERNAL (2000). Extended Enterprise Resources, Networks and Learning, EC project, IST- 1999-10091, 2000.
13. Euzenat, J., Stuckenschmidt, H. (2003). The 'family of Languages' approach to semantic interoperability. In Omelayenko, B. and Klein, M., editors, Knowledge Transformation for the Semantic Web, Amsterdam. IOS Press.
14. Gardner, T., Griffin, C., Koehler, J., and Hauser R. (2003). A review of OMG MOF 2.0 Query/Views/Transformations Submissions and Recommendations towards the final Standard. OMG Document: 03-08-02.
15. Goossenaerts, J. Gruninger, M. Nell, J.G., Petit, M. and Vernadat, F. (1997). Formal Semantics of Enterprise Models. In Proc. of ICEIMT'97, K.Kosanke and J.G Nell. (Eds.), Springer- Verlag.
16. Heymans, P., Saval, G., Dallons, G. and Pollet, I. (2005). A Template-Based Analysis of GRL: Book chapter, in Advanced Topic in Database Research-Volume 5. Idea Group Publishing.
17. Jochem, R. (2002). Common representation through UEML-requirement and approach. In Proc. of ICEIMT 2002 (Kosanke K., Jochem R., Nell J., Ortiz Bas A. (Eds.)), Polytechnic University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain, April 24-26, Kluwer. IFIP TC 5/WG5.12.
18. Jochem, R. Mertins, K. (1999). Quality-Oriented Design of Business Processes. Kluwer, Boston.
19. Jørgensen, H.D. (2004). Interactive Process Models, dr.ing. thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU).
20. Krogstie, J. (2001). A Semiotic Approach to Quality in Requirements Specifications. Organizational Semiotics 2001: 231-249
21. Lindland, OI, Sindre, G. and Sølvberg, A. (1994). Understanding Quality in Conceptual Modelling, IEEE Software, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 42-49.
22. Mertins, K., Knothe, T., Zelm, M. (2004). User oriented Enterprise Modeling for Interoperability with UEML. In Proc. of EMMSAD'04 Evaluating Modeling Methods for Systems Analysis and Design pp.25-36, joint with CAiSE04, Riga-Latvia, June 7-8.
23. Opdahl A.L. (2003). Multi-Perspective Multi-Purpose Enterprise Knowledge Modelling. In Concurrent Engineering: Enhanced Interoperable Systems, pp. 609-617, Ricardo Jardim-Goncalves, Jianzhong Cha and Adolfo Steiger-Garco (eds.). A.A. Balkema Publishers.
24. Opdahl, A.L. (2006). The UEML Approach to Modelling Construct Description. I-ESA'06, Bordeaux, France, May 2006.
25. Opdahl, A.L. & Henderson-Sellers, B. (2004). A Template for Defining Enterprise Modelling Constructs. Journal of Database Management 15(2).
26. Opdahl, A.L. and Henderson-Sellers, B. (2005). Template-Based Definition of Information Systems and Enterprise Modelling Constructs. To appear in Ontologies and Business System Analysis, Peter Green and Michael Rosemann (eds.). Idea Group Publishing, 2005 (planned).
27. OOPSLA (2004). Proceedings of the 4th OOPSLA Workshop on Domain-Specific Modeling (DSM'04), Tolvanen, J.-P., Sprinkle, J., Rossi, M., (eds.), Computer Science and Information System Reports, Technical Reports, TR-33, University of Jyväskylä, Finland, ISBN 951-39-1947-1.
28. Panetto H., Berio G., Benali K., Boudjlida N., Petit M. (2004). A Unified Enterprise Modelling Language for enhanced interoperability of Enterprise Models. In Proc. of the 11th IFAC INCOM2004 Symposium, Bahia, Brazil, April 5-7.
29. Petit, M. (2002). Some methodological clues for defining a UEML. In Proceedings of ICEIMT 2002 (Kosanke K., Jochem R., Nell J., Ortiz Bas A. (Eds.)), April 24-26, Valencia, Spain, Kluwer.
30. Vernadat, F. (2002). UEML: Towards a unified enterprise modelling language. International Journal of Production Research, 40 (17), pp. 4309-4321.
31. Wand, Y. & Weber, R. (1988). An ontological analysis of some fundamental information systems concepts. In Proc. "Ninth International Conference on Information Systems", (DeGross, J.I. & Olson, M.H. (eds.), Minneapolis/USA, November 30-December 3, 1988, pp. 213-225.
32. Wand, Y. & Weber, R. (1993). On the ontological expressiveness of information systems analysis and design grammars. Journal of Information Systems, 3:217-237.
33. Wand, Y. & Weber, R. (1995). On the deep structure of information systems. Information Systems Journal, 5:203-223.