An introduction to statistical methods used in binary outcome modeling

Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 153-166

  Nathanson, Brian H ^a   Higgins, Thomas L ^b  

^a OptiStatim LLC   (United States)

^b BAYSTATE MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Binary outcome; Equation; Model; Regression

Indexed keywords

BINARY OUTCOME; DIABETES MELLITUS; HEART SURGERY; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; INTENSIVE CARE; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MEDICAL LITERATURE; NOMENCLATURE; PREDICTION; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; SURGICAL RISK;

AGE FACTORS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; ODDS RATIO; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 52149101443     PISSN: 10892532     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1089253208323415     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Zimmerman JE, Kramer AA, McNair DS, Malila FM Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) IV: hospital mortality assessment for today's critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2006 ; 34: 1297-1310.
2. Moreno RP, Metnitz PG, Almeida E., et al. SAPS 3- from evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 2: development of a prognostic model for hospital mortality at ICU admission. Intensive Care Med. 2005 ; 31: 1345-1355.
3. Higgins TL, Teres D., Copes WS, Nathanson BH, Kramer AA, Stark M. Assessing contemporary ICU outcome: an updated mortality probability admission model (MPM0-III). Crit Care Med. 2007 ; 35: 827-835.
4. Higgins TL, Estafanous FG, Loop FD, et al. ICU admission score for predicting morbidity and mortality risk after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997 ; 64: 1050-1058.
5. Higgins TL, Estafanous FG, Loop FD, Beck GJ, Blum JM, Paranandi L. Stratification of morbidity and mortality outcome by pre-operative risk factors in coronary artery bypass patients: a clinical severity score. JAMA. 1992 ; 267: 2344-2348.
6. Orr RK, Maini BS, Sottile FD, Dumas EM, O'Mara P. A comparison of four severity-adjusted models to predict mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Arch Surg. 1995 ; 130: 301-306.
7. Baker SP, O'Neill B., Haddon W. Jr, Long WB The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma. 1974 ; 14: 187-196.
8. Champion HR, Sacco WJ, Copes WS, Gann DS, Genarelli TA, Flanagan ME A revision of the trauma score. J Trauma. 1989 ; 29: 623-629.
9. Chawda MN, Hildebrand F., Pape HC, Giannoudis PV Predicting outcome after multiple trauma: which scoring system ? Injury. 2004 ; 35: 347-358.
10. Copas JB, Long T. Estimating the residual variance in orthogonal regression with variable selection. Statistician. 1991 ; 40: 51-59.
11. Derksen S., Keselman HJ Backward, forward and stepwise automated subset selection algorithms: frequency of obtaining authentic and noise variables. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 1992 ; 45: 265-282.
12. Harrell FE Regression Modeling Strategies With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag ; 2001.
13. Pagano M., Gauvereau K. Principles of Biostatistics. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth ; 1993.
14. Weisberg S. Applied Linear Regression. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons ; 1985.
15. Vittinghoff E., Glidden DV, Shiboski SC, McCulloch CE Regression Methods in Biostatistics: Linear, Logistic, Survival, and Repeated Measures Models. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag ; 2005.
16. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. 2 nd ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons ; 2000.
17. Stratton SJ, Niemann JT Reconsideration of proximate Utstein-style end points. Crit Care Med. 2002 ; 30 (4 suppl). S137 - S139.
18. Iezzoni LI, Foley SM, Daley J., Hughes J., Fisher ES, Heeren T. Comorbidities, complications, and coding bias. Does the number of diagnosis codes matter in predicting in-hospital mortality ? JAMA. 1992 ; 267: 2197-2203.
19. Wiener RS, Welch HG Trends in the use of the pulmonary artery catheter in the United States, 1993-2004. JAMA. 2007 ; 298: 423-429.
20. Minneci PC, Deans KJ, Banks SM, Eichacker PQ, Natanson C. Meta-analysis: the effect of steroids on survival and shock during sepsis depends on the dose. Ann Intern Med. 2004 ; 141: 47-56.
21. Meijering S., Corstjens AM, Tulleken JE, Meertens JH, Zijlstra JG, Ligtenberg JJ Towards a feasible algorithm for tight glycaemic control in critically ill patients: systematic review of the literature. Crit Care. 2006 ; 10: R19.
22. Murphy-Filkins RL, Teres D., Lemeshow S., Hosmer DW Effect of changing patient mix on the performance of an intensive care unit severity-of-illness model: how to distinguish a general from a specialty intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 1996 ; 24: 1968-1973.
23. Nathanson B., Copes W., Stark M., Kramer A., Teres D., Higgins TL Mortality probability models (MPM0-III) for specialized patient populations. Chest Meeting Abstr. 2005 ; 128: 349S.
24. Higgins TL Cardiac surgery "report card" modeling. Curr Opin Crit Care. 1997 ; 3: 169-174.
25. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960 ; 20: 37-46.
26. Clark TG, Altman DG Developing a prognostic model in the presence of missing data: an ovarian cancer case-study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003 ; 56: 28-37.
27. Little RJA, Rubin D. Statistical Analysis With Missing Data. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons ; 1987.
28. van Buuren S., Boshuizen HC, Knook DL Multiple imputation of missing blood pressure covariates in survival analysis. Stat Med. 1999 ; 18: 681-694.
29. Carlin J., Li N., Greenwood P., Coffey C. Tools for analyzing multiple imputed datasets. Stata J. 2003 ; 3: 226-224.
30. Vach W. Some issues in estimating the effect of prognostic factors from incomplete covariate data. Stat Med. 1994 ; 16: 57-72.
31. Efron B., Tibshirani R. Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy. Stat Sci. 1986 ; 1: 54-77.
32. Efron B., Tibshirani R. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall ; 1993.
33. Davison AC, Hinkley DV Bootstrap Methods and Their Application. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press ; 1997.
34. Cleveland W. Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. J Am Stat Assoc. 1979 ; 74: 829-836.
35. Stone CJ, Koo CY Additive splines in statistics. In: Proceedings of the Statistical Computing Section ASA. Washington, DC: American Statistical Association ; 1985 :45-48.
36. Harrell FE, Lee KL, Mark DB Tutorial in biostatistics. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med. 1996 ; 15: 361-387.
37. Demidenko E. Sample size determination for logistic regression revisited. Stat Med. 2007 ; 26: 3385-3397.
38. Mickey J., Greenland S. A study on the impact of con-founder selection criteria on effect estimation. Am J Epidemiol. 1989 ; 129: 125-137.
39. Spiegelhalter DJ Probabilistic prediction in patient management and clinical trials. Stat Med. 1986 ; 5: 421-433.
40. Linnet K. Assessing diagnostic tests by a strictly proper scoring rule. Stat Med. 1989 ; 8: 609-618.
41. Derksen S., Keselman HJ Backward, forward and stepwise automated subset selection algorithms: frequency of obtaining authentic and noise variables. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 1992 ; 45: 265-282.
42. Austin PC, Tu J. Bootstrap methods for developing predictive models. Am Statistician. 2004 ; 58: 131-137.
43. Sauerbrei W., Schumacher M. A bootstrap resampling procedure for model building: application ot the Cox regression model. Stat Med. 1992 ; 11: 2093-2109.
44. Nagelkerker NJD. A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determintation. Biometrika. 1991 ; 78: 691-692.
45. Cragg JG, Uhler R. The demand for automobiles. Can J Econ. 1970 ; 3: 386-406.
46. Hosmer DW, Hosmer T., Le Cessie S., Lemeshow S. A comparison of goodness-of-fit tests for the logistic regression model. Stat Med. 1997 ; 16: 965-980.
47. Kramer AA, Zimmerman JE Assessing the calibration of mortality benchmarks in critical care: the Hosmer-Lemeshow test revisited. Crit Care Med. 2007 ; 35: 2052-2056.
48. Le Cessie S., van Houwelingen JC A goodness-of-fit test for binary regression models, based on smoothing methods. Biometrics. 1991 ; 47: 1267-1282.
49. Rapoport J., Teres D., Lemeshow S., Gelbach SL A method for assessing the clinical performance and cost-effectiveness of intensive care units: a multicenter inception cohort study. Crit Care Med. 1994 ; 22: 1385-1391.
50. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982 ; 143: 29-36.
51. DeLong ER, DeLong D., Clarke-Pearson DL Comparing the area under two or more correlated receiver operating curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988 ; 44: 837-845.
52. Raftery AE Bayesian model selection in social research. In: Marsden PV, ed. Sociological Methodology, Vol. 26. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell ; 1996: 111-163.
53. Long JS, Freese J. Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press ; 2003.
54. Pregibon D. Logistic regression diagnostics. Ann Stat. 1981 ; 9: 705-724.
55. Pierce DA, Schafer DW Residuals in generalized linear models. J Am Stat Assoc. 1986 ; 81: 977-986.
56. Hardin JW, Hilbe JM Generalized Linear Models and Extensions. College Station, TX: Stata Press ; 2001.
57. Aldrich JH, Nelson FD Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage ; 1984.
58. McLachlan GJ Discriminant Analysis and Statistical Pattern Recognition. New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience ; 2004.
59. Breiman L., Friedman JH, Stone CJ, Olshen RA Classification Trees and Regression Trees. Pacific Grove, CA: Wadsworth and Brooks / Cole ; 1984.
60. Ripley BD Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press ; 1996.
61. Nathanson BH, Higgins TL, Teres D., Copes WS, Kramer A., Stark M. A revised method to assess ICU clinical performance and resource utilization. Crit Care Med. 2007 ; 35: 1853-1862.
62. Becker RB, Zimmerman JE, Knaus WA, et al. The use of APACHE III to evaluate ICU length of stay, resource use and mortality after coronary artery by-pass surgery. J Cardiovasc Surg. 1995 ; 36: 1-11.