The half-cycle correction explained: Two alternative pedagogical approaches

Medical Decision Making

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 706-712

  Naimark, David M J ^a,c,e   Bott, Michelle ^d   Krahn, Murray ^b,c  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^d Guelph General Hospital   (Canada)

^e NONE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Educational; Markov chains; Models; Statistical

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHANGE THEORY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DECISION MAKING; EDUCATIONAL THEORY; EMPIRICISM; HALF CYCLE CORRECTION; HYPOTHESIS; LEARNING; MATHEMATICS; PROBABILITY; STUDENT; TEACHING;

ALGORITHMS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; HUMANS; MARKOV CHAINS; ONTARIO; SOFTWARE;

EID: 52149097376     PISSN: 0272989X     EISSN: 1552681X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X08315241     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Detsky AS, Krahn M., Naglie G., Naimark D., Redelmeier D. Primer on medical decision analysis: part 1. Introduction. Med Decis Making. 1997 ; 17: 123-5.
2. Detsky AS, Krahn M., Naglie G., Naimark D., Redelmeier D. Primer on medical decision analysis: Part 2. Tree structure. Med Decis Making. 1997 ; 17: 126-35.
3. Naglie G., Krahn M., Naimark D., Redelmeier D., Detsky AS Primer on medical decision analysis: part 3. Utility measures medical decision making. Med Decis Making. 1997 ; 17: 136-41.
4. Krahn M., Naglie G., Naimark D., Redelmeier D., Detsky AS Primer on medical decision analysis: part 4. Sensitivity analysis. Med Decis Making. 1997 ; 17: 142-51.
5. Naimark D., Krahn M., Naglie G., Redelmeier D., Detsky AS Primer on medical decision analysis: part 5. Working with Markov processes. Med Decis Making. 1997 ; 17: 142-51.
6. Redelmeier DA, Detsky AS, Krahn M., Naimark D., Naglie G. Guidelines for verbal presentations of medical decision analyses. Med Decis Making. 1997 ; 17: 228-30.
7. Sonnenberg FA, Beck JR Markov models in medical decision making: a practical guide. Med Decis Making. 1993 ; 13: 322-38.
8. Instruction manual for Treeage Pro v 2006. Chapter 34. Building and Analyzing Markov Models. Williamstown (MA): TreeAge Software ; 2006.
9. Dunn R. Capitalizing on college students' learning styles: theory, practice, and research. In: Dunn R, Griggs SA, eds. Practical Approaches to Using Learning Styles in Higher Education. Despot (CT): Bergin & Garvey ; 2000.
10. Ingham J. An experimental investigation of the relationships among learning style perceptual strength, instructional strategies, training achievement, and attitudes of corporate employees. Anonymous. St. John's University, Queens, NY ; 1989. 04-12-1 A.D. Doctor of Education. Available at: http://www.lib.umi.com/dissertations.
11. Tendy SM Effects of matching and mis-matching perceptual and sociological learning-style preferences on achievement and attitude of individuals in a group exercise leadership instructional training program. Anonymous. St. John's University, Queens, NY ; 1998. 04-11-1 A.D. Doctor of Education. Available at: http://www.lib.umi.com/dissertations.
12. Raupers P. Effects of accommodating perceptual learning-style preferences on long-term retention and attitudes toward technology of elementary and secondary teachers in professional development training. Anonymous. St. John's University, Queens, NY ; 1999. 04-12-1 A.D. Doctor of Education. Available at: http://www.lib.umi.com/dissertations.
13. Dunn R. Understanding the Dunn and Dunn learning styles model and the need for individual diagnosis and prescription. Reading Writing Learn Disabil. 1990 ; 6: 223-47.
14. Decision Maker for Windows operating manual. Page 39. New Brunswick: University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey ; 2007.
15. Instruction manual for Treeage Pro v 2007. Chapter 35, Page 476. Chapter 35: Markov modeling tools and techniques. Williamstown (MA): TreeAge Software ; 2007.