Disambiguating sounds through context

Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing 2008, ICSC 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 88-95

  Niessen, Maria E ^a   Van Maanen, Leendert ^a   Andringa, Tjeerd C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFORMAL MAPPING; FEATURE EXTRACTION; INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH; INFORMATION THEORY; SEMANTICS; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

AUDIO FEATURE EXTRACTION; AUDIO FEATURES; AUDITORY SCENE; CONTEXT INFORMATION; DYNAMIC NETWORKS; INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES; SEARCH SPACES; SOUND IDENTIFICATION; SOUND RECOGNITION;

AUDIO ACOUSTICS;

EID: 52149087427     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICSC.2008.27     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. T. C. Andringa and M. E. Niessen. Real-world sound recognition: A recipe. In Proceedings of LSAS 2006, pages 106-118, 2006.
2. J. A. Ballas. Common factors in the identification of an assortment of brief everyday sounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19(2):250-267, 1993.
3. J. A. Ballas and J. H. Howard. Interpreting the language of environmental sounds. Environment and Behavior, 19(1):91-114, 1987.
4. J. A. Ballas and T. Mullins. Effects of context on the identification of everyday sounds. Human Performance, 4(3):199-219, 1991.
5. J. P. Barker, M. P. Cooke, and D. P. W. Ellis. Decoding speech in the presence of other sources. Speech Communication, 45(1):5-25, 2005.
6. A. S. Bregman. Auditory Scene Analysis. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1990.
7. P. R. Cohen and R. Kjeldsen. Information retrieval by constrained spreading activation in semantic networks. Information Processing & Management, 23(4):255-268, 1987.
8. M. Cooke and D. P. Ellis. The auditory organization of speech and other sources in listeners and computational models. Speech Communication, 35(3-4):141-177, 2001.
9. M. Côté, E. Lecolinet, M. C. C. Y., and Suen. Automatic reading of cursive scripts using a reading model and perceptual concepts. International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition, 1(1):3-17, 1998.
10. M. Cowling and R. Sitte. Comparison of techniques for environmental sound recognition. Pattern Recognition Letters, 24(15):2895-2907, 2003.
11. F. Crestani. Application of spreading activation techniques in information retrieval. Artificial Intelligence Review, 11(6):453-482, 1997.
12. B. Defréville, P. Roy, C. Rosin, and F. Pachet. Automatic recognition of urban sound sources. In Proceedings of the 120th AES Convention, 2006.
13. D. P. Ellis. Prediction-driven computational auditory scene analysis. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1996.
14. D. P. Ellis. Using knowledge to organize sound: The prediction-driven approach to computational auditory scene analysis and its application to speech/nonspeech mixtures. Speech Communication, 27:281-298, 1999.
15. W. W. Gaver. What in the world do we hear?: An ecological approach to auditory event perception. Ecological Psychology, 5(1):1-29, 1993.
16. D. J. Godsmark and G. J. Brown. A blackboard architecture for computational auditory scene analysis. Speech Communication, 27:351-366, 1999.
17. S. Grossberg, K. K. Govindarajan, L. L. Wyse, and M. A. Cohen. Artstream: a neural network model of auditory scene analysis and source segregation. Neural Networks, 17(4):511-536, 2004.
18. B. Gygi, G. R. Kidd, and C. S. Watson. Similarity and categorization of environmental sounds. Perception & Psychophysics, 69(6):839-855, 2007.
19. B. Gygi and V. Shafiro. Effect of context on identification of environmental sounds. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(5):3334, 2006.
20. B. Gygi and V. Shafiro. General functions and specific applications of environmental sound research. Frontiers in Bioscience, 12:3152-3166, 2007.
21. D. J. Krijnders, M. E. Niessen, and T. C. Andringa. Robust harmonic complex estimation in noise. In Proceedings of ICA, 2007.
22. J. L. McClelland and D. E. Rumelhart. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. an account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88(5):375-407, 1981.
23. J. Nix and V. Hohmann. Combined estimation of spectral envelopes and sound source direction of concurrent voices by multidimensional statistical filtering. IEEE Transactions On Audio Speech And Language Processing, 15(3):995-1008, 2007.
24. F. Pachet and P. Roy. Exploring billions of audio features. In Proceedings of CBMI 07, pages 227-235, 2007.
25. M. R. Quillian. Semantic memory. In M. Minsky, editor, Semantic Information Processing, pages 216-270. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1968.
26. O. Scharenborg. Reaching over the gap: A review of efforts to link human and automatic speech recognition research. Speech Communication, 49(5):336-347, 2007.
27. R. V. Shannon, F.-G. Zeng, V. Kamath, J. Wygonski, and M. Ekelid. Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science, 270(5234):303-304, 1995.
28. Z. M. Smith, B. Delgutte, and A. J. Oxenham. Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception. Nature, 416:87-90, 2002.
29. L. van Maanen. Mediating expert knowledge and visitor interest in art work recommendation. In Proceedings of LWA 2007, pages 367-372, 2007.
30. L. van Maanen, H. van Rijn, M. van Grootel, S. Kemna, M. Klomp, and E. Scholtens. Personal publication assistant: Abstract recommendation by a cognitive model. Submitted.
31. N. J. Vanderveer. Ecological acoustics: Human perception of environmental sounds. PhD thesis, Cornell University, 1979.
32. R. Violanda, H. van de Vooren, and T. C. Andringa. Signal component estimation using phase and energy information. Submitted.
33. D. Wang and G. J. Brown. Computational Auditory Scene Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, Holoken, NJ, 2006.
34. W. A. Yost. Auditory image perception and analysis: The basis for hearing. Hearing Research, 56(1-2):8-18, 1991.