PASS: An approach to personalized automated service composition

Proceedings - 2008 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing, SCC 2008

Volumn 1, Issue , 2008, Pages 283-290

  Li, Yang ^a   Huai, JinPeng ^a   Sun, Hailong ^a   Deng, Ting ^a   Guo, Huipeng ^a  

^a BEIHANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; HEURISTIC PROGRAMMING; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; PARETO PRINCIPLE;

APPLICATION SCENARIOS; AUTOMATED SERVICE COMPOSITION; BUSINESS PROCESSES; COMPOSITE SERVICES; HARD-CONSTRAINTS; HEURISTIC PLANNING; INITIAL STATES; INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES; KNOWLEDGE BASE; RAPID DEVELOPMENT; RELAXATION DEGREE; SERVICE COMPOSITIONS; SERVICE-ORIENTED COMPUTING; SERVICES COMPUTING; USER PREFERENCES; USER-CENTRIC;

SOFTWARE AGENTS;

EID: 52049124998     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/SCC.2008.24     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. al., R.R.e. The SAHARA Model for Service Composition Across Multiple Providers. Proc. of International Conference on Pervasive Computing (Pervasive 2002).
2. Wu D , P.B., Sirin E , et al. Automating DAML-S Web services composition using SHOP2. Proceedings of 2nd International Semantic Web Conference ( ISWC2003).
3. Sirin, E., et al., HTN Planning for Web Service Composition Using SHOP2. Journal of Web Semantics. 2004 (1): p. 377-396.
4. Mark Carman, L.S., Paolo Traverso. Web Service Composition Using Markov Decision Processes. Proceedings of the WAIM 2005. 2005.
5. Marco Pistore, P.T., Piergiorgio Bertoli. Automated Composition of Web Services by Planning in Asynchronous Domains. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling. 2005.
6. Lamparter, S., A. Ankolekar, and S. Grimm. Preferencebased Selection of Highly Configurable Web Services. WWW. 2007.
7. Küster, U., et al. DIANE An Integrated Approach to Automated Service Discovery, Matchmaking and Composition. WWW. 2007.
8. W.-T. Balke, M.W. Towards personalized selection of web services. WWW. 2003.
9. Balke, W.-T. and M. Wagner. Through Different Eyes-Assessing Multiple Conceptual Views for Querying Web Services. WWW. 2004.
10. Godfrey, P. Skyline Cardinality for Relational Processing. Int Symp. on Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems (FoIKS). 2004. Wil-helminenburg Castle, Austria.
11. Maryland university. JSHOP2. https://sourceforge.net/projects/shop. 2005.
12. Chan, M., Bishop, J., & Baresi, L. Survey and Comparison of Planning Techniques for Web Services Composition. University of Pretoria Pretoria, Technical Report. 2007: Polelo Research Group Department of Computer Science. South Africa.
13. Peer, J. Web Service Composition as AI Planning - a Survey. University of St., Gallen, Switzerland. 2005.
14. Chomicki, J. Querying with intrinsic preferences. Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Extending Database Tech-nology (EDBT). 2002.
15. Kießling, W. and G. Köstler. Foundations of Preferences in Database Systems. Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Very Large) Databases (VLDB). 2002.
16. Pu, P. User-Involved Preference Elicitation. in Eighteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence,Workshop on Configuration. 2003. Mexico.
17. C. Gonzales, P.P. Graphical Models for Utility Elicitation. DIMACS/LAMSADE Workshop on Computer Science and Decision Theory. 2004. France.
18. Qainhui Althea Liang, J.-Y.C., Steven Miller. Towards Semantic Service Request of Web Service Composition. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on e-Business Engineering (ICEBE). 2005.
19. Mahmoud, E.A.-M.a.Q.H. Discovering the Best Web Service. WWW. 2006.
20. Sudhir Agarwal, S.L. User Preference Based Automated Selection of Web Service Compositions. ICSOC Workshop on Dynamic Web Processes. 2005.
21. Lin M S, X.J.S., Guo H Q. Solving QoS-driven Web service dynamic composition as fuzzy constraint satisfaction. The IEEE International Conference on e-Technology , e-Commerce and e-Service. 2005.