Camera self-calibration and three dimensional reconstruction under quasi-perspective projection

Proceedings of the 5th Canadian Conference on Computer and Robot Vision, CRV 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 129-136

  Wang, Guanghui ^a,b   Wu, Q M Jonathan ^a   Zhang, Wei ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR   (Canada)

^b AVIATION UNIVERSITY OF AIR FORCE   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION; COMPUTER VISION; FACTORIZATION; REPAIR; RESTORATION; ROBOTICS; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

CAMERA MODELING; CAMERA PARAMETERS; CAMERA SELF-CALIBRATION; COMPUTER AND ROBOT VISION; EUCLIDEAN RECONSTRUCTION; FOCAL LENGTHS; IMAGE SEQUENCING; IMAGING PROCESSING; INTRINSIC PARAMETERS; PERSPECTIVE PROJECTIONS; REAL IMAGE SEQUENCES; THREE-DIMENSIONAL RECONSTRUCTION;

CAMERAS;

EID: 52049116893     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CRV.2008.19     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. S. Christy and R. Horaud. Euclidean shape and motion from multiple perspective views by affine iterations. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell, 18(11):1098-1104, 1996.
2. O. D. Faugeras, Q.-T Luong, and S. J. Maybank. Camera self-calibration: Theory and experiments. In proc. European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 321-334, 1992.
3. M. Han and T. Kanade. Creating 3D models with uncalibrated cameras. Inproc. IEEE Computer Society Workshop on the Application of Computer Vision (WACV2000), December 2000.
4. R. Hartley. Kruppa's equations derived from the fundamental matrix. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 19(2):133-135, February 1997.
5. R. Hartley and A. Zisserman. Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision. Cambridge University Press, ISBN: 0521540518, second edition, 2004.
6. A. Heyden and K. Åström. Euclidean reconstruction from image sequences with varying and unknown focal length and principal point. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 438-443, 1997.
7. A. Heyden and K. Åström. Minimal conditions on intrinsic parameters for euclidean reconstruction. In Proc. Asian Conference on Computer Vision, pages 169-176, 1998.
8. A. Heyden, R. Berthilsson, and G. Sparr. An iterative factorization method for projective structure and motion from image sequences. Image Vision Comput., 17(13):981-991, 1999.
9. Z. Hu, Y. Wu, F. Wu, and S. Ma. The number of independent kruppa constraints from N images. J. Comput. Sci. Technol., 21(2):209-217, 2006.
10. Q. Luong and O. Faugeras. Self-calibration of a moving camera from point correspondences and fundamental matrices. IJCV, 22(3):261-289, March 1997.
11. S. Mahamud and M. Hebert. Iterative projective reconstruction from multiple views. In CVPR, volume 2, pages 430-437, 2000.
12. S. Maybank and O. Faugeras. A theory of self-calibration of a moving camera. International Journal of Computer Vision, 8(2):123-151, August 1992.
13. C. Poelman and T. Kanade. A paraperspective factorization method for shape and motion recovery. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 19(3):206-218, March 1997.
14. M. Pollefeys, L. J. Van Gool, and M. Proesmans. Euclidean 3D reconstruction from image sequences with variable focal lenghts. In European Conference on Computer Vision (1), pages 31-42, 1996.
15. M. Pollefeys, R. Koch, and L. J. Van Gool. Self-calibration and metric reconstruction in spite of varying and unknown intrinsic camera parameters. International Journal of Computer Vision, 32(1):7-25, August 1999.
16. L. Quan. Self-calibration of an affine camera from multiple views. International Journal of Computer Vision, 19(1):93-105, 1996.
17. P. F. Sturm and B. Triggs. A factorization based algorithm for multi-image projective structure and motion. In ECCV (2), pages 709-720, 1996.
18. C. Tomasi and T. Kanade. Shape and motion from image streams under orthography: a factorization method. International Journal of Computer Vision, 9(2):137-154, 1992.
19. P. H. S. Torr, A. Zisserman, and S. J. Maybank. Robust detection of degenerate configurations while estimating the fundamental matrix. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 71(3):312-333, 1998.
20. B. Triggs. Factorization methods for projective structure and motion. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, San Francisco, California, pages 845-851, 1996.
21. G. Wang. A hybrid system for feature matching based on SIFT and epipolar constraints. In Tech. Rep. Department of ECE, University of Windsor, 2006.
22. G. Wang and J. Wu. Quasi-perspective projection model with applications to structure and motion factorization of rigid and nonrigid objects. In Tech. Rep. Department of ECE, University of Windsor, 2007.
23. G. Xu and N. Sugimoto. Algebraic derivation of the Kruppa equations and a new algorithm for self-calibration of cameras. Journal of the Optical Society of America-A, 16(10):2419-2424, October 1999.