The influence of absorption factors on the sensitivity of a virtual room's sound field to scattering coefficients

Applied Acoustics

Volumn 69, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 1249-1257

  Wang, Lily M ^a   Rathsam, Jonathan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer model; Room acoustics; Scattering coefficient

Indexed keywords

ABSORPTION; ACOUSTIC FIELD MEASUREMENT; ACOUSTIC FIELDS; ACOUSTICS; ARCHITECTURAL ACOUSTICS; COMPUTER SYSTEMS; DIFFUSION; REVERBERATION; SCATTERING; STANDARDS;

AB SORPTION COEFFICIENTS; COMPUTER MODEL; COMPUTER MODELLING; DIFFUSE REFLECTIONS; DIFFUSIVITY; LIMITED INFORMATION; REFLECTIVE SURFACES; REVERBERATION TIME; ROOM ACOUSTICS; SCATTERING COEFFICIENT; SENSITIVITY INDICES; SOUND ENERGY; SOUND FIELDS; STANDARD DEVIATION;

ACOUSTIC WAVE SCATTERING;

EID: 52049109652     PISSN: 0003682X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2007.09.007     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Kuttruff H. Room acoustics. 4th ed. (2000), Spon, London p. 116-122
2. ODEON Room Acoustics Program. Version 6.5. User's manual.
3. CATT-Acoustic Version 7.2. Room Acoustics Prediction and Desktop Auralization. User's manual.
4. Hodgson M. Evidence of diffuse surface reflections in rooms. J Acoust Soc Am 89 2 (1991) 765-771
5. Gomes M.H.A., Gerges S.N.Y., and Tenenbaum R.A. On the accuracy of the assessment of room acoustics parameters using MLS technique and numerical simulation. Acustica 86 (2000) 891-895
6. Howarth M.J., and Lam Y.W. An assessment of the accuracy of a hybrid room acoustics model with surface diffusion facility. Appl Acoust 60 (2000) 237-251
7. Lam Y.M. The dependence of diffusion parameters in a room acoustics prediction model on auditorium sizes and shapes. J Acoust Soc Am 100 4 (1996) 2193-2203
8. ISO 17497-1: 2004 Acoustics - sound-scattering properties of surfaces - part 1: measurement of the random-incidence scattering coefficient in a reverberation room.
9. Jeon J.Y., Lee S.C., and Vorländer M. Development of scattering surfaces for concert halls. Appl Acoust 65 (2004) 341-355
10. Sakuma T, Kosaka Y. Comparison between scattering coefficients determined by specimen rotation and by directivity correlation. In: Proceedings of international symposium on rooms acoustics: design and science, Kyoto; 2004.
11. Cox T., and D'Antonio P. Acoustic absorbers and diffusers: theory, design, and application (2004), Spon, New York p. 393-5
12. Schroeder M.R., and Hackman D. Iterative calculation of reverberation time. Acustica 45 (1980) 270-273
13. Benedetto G., and Spagnolo R. Reverberation time in enclosures: the surface reflection law and the dependence of the absorption coefficient on the angle of incidence. J Acoust Soc Am 77 4 (1991) 1447-1451
14. Kuttruff H., and Strassen Th. Zur Abhängigkeit des Raumnachhalls von der Wanddiffusität und von der Raumform. Acustica 45 (1980) 246-255
15. Bistafa S.R., and Bradley J.S. Predicting reverberation times in a simulated classroom. J Acoust Soc Am 108 4 (2000) 1721-1731
16. Bork I. A comparison of room simulation software - the 2nd round robin on room acoustical computer simulation. Acustica 86 (2000) 943-956
17. Torres R.R., Kleiner M., and Dalenbäck B.I. Audibility of 'diffusion' in room acoustics auralization: an initial investigation. Acustica 86 (2000) 1-9
18. Dalenbäck B., Kleiner M., and Svensson P. A macroscopic view of diffuse reflection. J Audio Eng Soc 42 10 (1994) 793-807
19. Kang J. Numerical modeling of the sound fields in urban squares. J Acoust Soc Am 117 6 (2005) 3695-3706
20. Eyring C.F. Reverberation time in 'dead' rooms. J Acoust Soc Am 1 (1930) 217-241