A study on the relevance criteria for medical images

Pattern Recognition Letters

Volumn 29, Issue 15, 2008, Pages 2046-2057

  Sedghi, Shahram ^a,b   Sanderson, Mark ^a   Clough, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b IRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Image retrieval; Medical imaging; Relevance criteria; Relevance judgment

Indexed keywords

HEALTH; HEALTH CARE; IMAGE RETRIEVAL;

GROUNDED THEORY; HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS; MEDICAL IMAGE RETRIEVAL; MEDICAL IMAGING; RELEVANCE CRITERIA; RELEVANCE JUDGMENT;

IMAGE ENHANCEMENT;

EID: 52049104406     PISSN: 01678655     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2008.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Armitage L.H., and Enser P.G.B. Analysis of user need in image archives. J. Inform. Sci. 23 4 (1997) 287-299
2. Barry C.L. User-defined relevance criteria: An exploratory study. J. Amer. Society Inform. Sci. 45 3 (1994) 149-159
3. Barry C.L., and Schamber L. Users' criteria for relevance evaluation: A cross-situational comparison. Inform. Process. Manage. 34 2-3 (1998) 219-236
4. Choi Y., and Rasmussen E.M. User's relevance criteria in image retrieval in American history. Inform. Process. Manage.: Internat. J. 38 5 (2002) 695-726
5. Corbin J.M., and Strauss A. Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qual. Sociol. 13 1 (1990) 3-21
6. Cunningham, S.J., Masoodian, M., 2006. Looking for a picture: An analysis of everyday image information searching. In: Proc. 6th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conf. on Digital Libraries, pp. 198-199.
7. Eakins J.P., and Graham M.E. Content-based Image Retrieval: A report to the JISC Technology Applications Programme (1999), Institute for Image Data Research, University of Northumbria at Newcastle
8. Ely J.W., Osheroff J.A., Ebell M.H., Bergus G.R., Levy B.T., Chambliss M.L., and Evans E.R. Analysis of questions asked by family doctors regarding patient care. Brit. Med. J. 319 7206 (1999) 358-361
9. Glaser B.G., and Holton J. Remodelling grounded theory. Qual. Soc. Res. 5 2 (2004) Art. 4
10. Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L., 1967. Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Aldine, Chicago.
11. Glatard, T., Montagnat, J., Magnin, I.E., 2004. Texture based medical image indexing and retrieval: Application to cardiac imaging. In: Proc. 6th ACM SIGMM Internat. Workshop on Multimedia Information Retrieval, New York, pp. 135-142.
12. Greisdorf H. Modelling what users see when they look at images: A cognitive viewpoint. J. Documen. 58 1 (2002) 6-29
13. Hersh, W., Jensen, J., Müller, H., Gorman, P., Ruch, P., 2005. A qualitative task analysis of biomedical image use and retrieval. In: ImageCLEF/MUSCLE Workshop on Image Retrieval Evaluation, Vienna, Austria, pp. 11-16.
14. Hung T.Y., Zoeller C., and Lyon S. Relevance judgments for image retrieval in the field of journalism: A pilot study. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 3815 (2005) 72-80
15. Lancaster F.W. Information Retrieval Systems: Characteristics, Testing, and Evaluation (1979), Wiley, New York
16. Maglaughlin K.L., and Sonnenwald D.H. User perspectives on relevance criteria: A comparison among relevant, partially relevant, and not-relevant judgments. J. Amer. Society Inform. Sci. Technol. 53 5 (2002) 327-342
17. Markkula M., and Sormunen E. End-user searching challenges indexing practices in the digital newspaper photo archive. J. Inform. Ret. 1 4 (2000) 259-285
18. Mizzaro S. Relevance: The whole history. J. Amer. Society Inform. Sci. 48 9 (1997) 810-832
19. Müller H., Michoux N., Bandon D., and Geissbuhler A. A review of content-based image retrieval systems in medical applications-clinical benefits and future directions. Internat. J. Med. Inform. 73 1 (2004) 1-23
20. Müller H., Deselaers T., Deserno T., Clough P., Kim E., and Hersh W. Overview of the ImageCLEFMed 2006 medical retrieval and medical annotation tasks. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 4730 (2007) 595-608
21. Müller H., Kalpathy-cramer J., Hersh W., and Geissbuhler A. Using medline queries to generate image retrieval tasks for benchmarking. Studies Health Technol. Inform. 136 (2008) 523-528
22. Paling, S., Miszkiewicz, M., Abbas, J., 2006. Digital images in United States and Canadian dental education: The role of delivery medium and metadata. In: Grove, A. (Ed.), Proc. 69th Annual Meeting Amer. Society for Inform. Sci. Technol. (ASIST), Austin, USA, pp. 1-21.
23. Park T.K. Toward a theory of user-based relevance: A call for a new paradigm of inquiry. J. Amer. Society Inform. Sci. 45 3 (1994) 135-141
24. Saracevic, T., 1996. Relevance reconsidered. In: Proc. 2nd Conf. on Conceptions of Library and Inform. Sci., Copenhagen, Royal School of Librarianship, pp. 201-218.
25. Schamber L. Relevance and information behaviour. Ann. Rev. Inform. Sci. Technol. 29 (1994) 3-48
26. Schamber L., Eisenberg M., and Nilan M.S. A re-examination of relevance: Toward a dynamic, situational definition. Inform. Process. Manag. 26 6 (1990) 755-776
27. Shelstad K.R., and Clevenger F.W. Information retrieval patterns and needs among practicing general surgeons: A statewide experience. Bull. Med. Library Assoc. 84 4 (1996) 490-497
28. Strauss A.L., and Corbin J.M. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (1990), Newbury Park, Sage
29. Tang R., and Solomon P. Toward an understanding of the dynamics of relevance judgment: An analysis of one person's search behaviour. Inform. Process. Manage. 34 2-3 (1998) 237-256
30. Tsai C.F. A review of image retrieval methods for digital cultural heritage resources. Online Inform. Rev. 31 2 (2007) 185-198