Human-computer interaction design with multi-goal facilities layout model

Computers and Mathematics with Applications

Volumn 56, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 2164-2174

  Peer, S K ^a   Sharma, Dinesh K ^b  

^a KLM College of Engineering for Women   (India)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND EASTERN SHORE   (United States)

Author keywords

Construction and Improvement procedures; Multi goal facilities layout; Quadratic assignment model; User interface components

Indexed keywords

FLOW INTERACTIONS; HUMAN ENGINEERING; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; QUADRATIC PROGRAMMING; ROAD CONSTRUCTION; USER INTERFACES;

CONSTRUCTION AND IMPROVEMENT PROCEDURES; EXCHANGE PROCESSES; FACILITIES LAYOUT; MULTI-GOAL FACILITIES LAYOUT; OBJECTIVE FUNCTION; QUADRATIC ASSIGNMENT; QUADRATIC ASSIGNMENT MODEL; RELATIVE WEIGHTS; TWO-STEP PROCEDURE; USER INTERFACE COMPONENTS;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 52049099837     PISSN: 08981221     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.camwa.2008.03.043     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Khare V.K., Khare M.K., and Neena M.L. Combined computer aided approach for the facilities design model estimating of the distribution parameter in the case of multi-goal optimization. Computers Industrial Engineering 14 (1988) 465-476
2. Rosenblatt M.J. The facilities layout problem: A multi-goal approach. International Journal of Production Research 17 4 (1979) 323-332
3. Dutta K.N., and Sahu S. Some studies on distribution parameters for facilities design problem. International journal of Production Research 19 (1981) 725
4. Dutta K.N., and Sahu S. A multi-goal heuristic for facilities design problem: MUGHAL. International Journal of Production Research 23 4 (1982) 773-782
5. Dutta K.N., and Sahu S. Comments on: A note on multi-goal heuristic for facilities design problem: MUGHAL. International Journal of Production Research 21 (1985) 448
6. Fortenberry J.F., and Cox J.S. Multiple criteria approach to the facilities layout problem. International Journal of Production Research 23 4 (1985) 773-782
7. Urban T.L. A multiple criteria model for the facilities layout problem. International Journal of Production Research 25 12 (1987) 1805-1812
8. Urban T.L. Combining qualitative and quantitative analysis of facilities layout. Production and Inventory Management 30 (1989) 73-77
9. B. Sayin, Facilities layout with multiple objectives, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Industrial Engineering. North Caroline State University, Raleigh, NC, 1981
10. Harmonosky C.M., and Tothero G.K. A multi-factor plant layout methodology. International Journal of Production Research 30 8 (1992) 1773-1789
11. Tiang P., Klang H., and Zhang D. Simulated annealing for the quadratic assignment problem: A further study. Computers Industrial Engineering 31 3-4 (1996) 925-928
12. Gerlach J.H., and Kuo F. Understanding human-computer interaction for information systems design. MIS Quarterly 15 4 (1991) 527-549
13. Card S.K. Theory-driven design research. In: McMillan G.R., Beevis D., Salas E., Sturb M.H., Sutton R., and Van Brede L. (Eds). Applications Human Performance Models to System Design (1989), Plenum Press, New York 501-509
14. Bhavnani S.K. The strategic use of complex computer system. Human-Computer Interaction 15 2-3 (2002) 107-137
15. Wright P.C., Fields R.E., and Harrison M.D. Analyzing human-computer interaction as distributed cognition: The resources model. Human-Computer Interaction 15 1 (2000) 1-40
16. Shneiderman B. Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction (2000), Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., Reading, MA
17. Card S.K., Moran T.P., and Newell A. The Psychology of Human-Computer Interface (1983), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
18. Mirel B. Applied constructivism for user documentation. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 12 1 (1998) 7-49
19. Olson J.R., and Olson G.M. The Growth of cognitive modeling in Human-computer Interaction since GOMS. Human-Computer Interaction 5 (1990) 221-265
20. Bovair S., Kieras D.E., and Polson P.G. The acquisition and performance of text editor skill: A cognitive complexity analysis. Human-Computer Interaction 5 (1990) 1-48
21. John B. Extension of GOMS analysis to expert performance requiring perception of dynamic visual, and auditory information. CHI'90 Proceedings (Seattle, W.A) (1990), ACM, NY 107-115
22. Chuah M.C., John B.E., and Pane J. Analyzing graphic and textual layouts with GOMS. Results of a preliminary analysis. Proceedings Companion of CHI'94 (1994), ACM, New York 323-324
23. M.A. Vincow, C. Wickens, Spatial layout of deployed information: Three steps towards developing quantitative models, in: Proceedings of Human Factors Society, 37th Annual meeting, Santa Monica, CA, 1993, pp. 348-352
24. Sears A. Layout appropriateness: Guiding user interface design with simple task descriptions. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 19 7 (1993) 707-719
25. McCormick E.J., Marks S., and Sanders M. Human Factors in Engineering and Design (1982), Tata Mcgraw-Hill, New Delhi
26. Peer S.K., and Sharma D.K. Single-objective layout design of user interface components with multiple qualitative factors. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing 14 1-2 (2004) 353-363
27. Peer S.K., Sharma D.K., Ravindranath K., and Naidu M.M. Layout design of user interface components with multiple objectives. Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research 14 2 (2004) 171-192
28. Grey W.D., John B.E., and Alwood M.E. Project Ernestine: Validating a GOMS analysis for predicting and explaining real-world task performance. Human-Computer Interaction 8 3 (1993) 237-309
29. John B.E., and Kieras D.E. The GOMS family of user interface analysis techniques: Comparison and contrast. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interactions 3 4 (1996) 320-351