메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 64, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 1109-1127

The problematic importance of hypotheses

Author keywords

Confirmation; Evidence; Hypothesis testing; Post hoc reasoning; Scientific knowledge; Theory appraisal

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY; COGNITION; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; METHODOLOGY; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; THINKING;

EID: 52049096867     PISSN: 00219762     EISSN: 10974679     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jclp.20522     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (10)

References (10)
  • 2
    • 0003706919 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Harlow, L.L, & Mulaik, S.A, Eds, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
    • Harlow, L.L., & Mulaik, S.A. (Eds.). (1997). What if there were no significance tests? Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    • (1997) What if there were no significance tests
  • 5
    • 0345569868 scopus 로고
    • Problems in the psycho-philosophy of knowledge
    • J.R. Royce & W.W. Rozeboom, Eds, New York: Gordon & Breach
    • Rozeboom, W.W. (1972a). Problems in the psycho-philosophy of knowledge. In J.R. Royce & W.W. Rozeboom, (Eds.), The psychology of knowing. New York: Gordon & Breach.
    • (1972) The psychology of knowing
    • Rozeboom, W.W.1
  • 6
    • 0010941253 scopus 로고
    • Scientific inference: The myth and the reality
    • S.R. Brown, & D.J. Brenner, Eds, New York: Columbia University Press
    • Rozeboom, W.W. (1972b). Scientific inference: The myth and the reality. In S.R. Brown, & D.J. Brenner, (Eds.), Science, psychology, and communication: Essays honoring William Stephenson. New York: Columbia University Press.
    • (1972) Science, psychology, and communication: Essays honoring William Stephenson
    • Rozeboom, W.W.1
  • 7
    • 84970340671 scopus 로고
    • Nicod's criterion: Subtler than you think
    • Rozeboom, W.W. (1972c). Nicod's criterion: Subtler than you think. Philosophy of Science, 47, 638-643.
    • (1972) Philosophy of Science , vol.47 , pp. 638-643
    • Rozeboom, W.W.1
  • 8
    • 0000674632 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Good science is abductive, not hypothetico-deductive
    • L.L. Harlow & S.A. Mulaik, Eds, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
    • Rozeboom, W.W. (1997). Good science is abductive, not hypothetico-deductive. In L.L. Harlow & S.A. Mulaik, (Eds.), What if there were no significance tests? Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    • (1997) What if there were no significance tests
    • Rozeboom, W.W.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.