Stabilization due to predator interference: Comparison of different analysis approaches

Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 567-583

  Van Voorn, G A K ^a   Stiefs, D ^b   Gross, T ^c   Kooi, B W ^a   Feudel, U ^b   Kooijman, S A L M ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

^c PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bifurcation analysis; Functional response; Generalized model; Stability

Indexed keywords

EID: 52049095531     PISSN: 15471063     EISSN: 15510018     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3934/mbe.2008.5.567     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. P. Abrams and C. J. Walters, Invulnerable prey and the paradox of enrichment Ecology 77 (1996), 1125-33.
2. P. Auger, B. W. Kooi, R. B. Bravo de la Parra and J.-C. Poggiale, Bifurcation analysis of a predator-prey model with predators using hawk and dove tactics, J. Theor. Biol. 238 (2006), 597-607.
3. A. D. Bazykin, "Nonlinear Dynamics of Interacting Populations," World Scientific, Singapore, 1998.
4. J. R. Beddington, Mutual interference between parasites or predators and its effect on searching efficiency, J. Anim. Ecol. 44 (1975), 331-40.
5. B. Boldin, Introducing a population into a steady community: The critical case, the center manifold and the direction of the bifurcation, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 66 (2006) 1424-53.
6. D. L. DeAngelis, R. A. Goldstein and R. V. O'Neill, A model for trophic interaction, Ecology 56 (1975), 881-92.
7. G. F. Fussman and B. Blasius., Community response to enrichment is highly sensitive to model structure, Biol. Lett. 1 (2005), 9-12.
8. M. Genkai-Kato and N. Yamamura, Unpalatable prey resolves the paradox of enrichment, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 266 (1999) 1215-19
9. M. E. Gilpin, Enriched predator-prey systems: Theoretical stability, Science 177 (1972), 902-4.
10. S. A. Gourley and Y. Kuang, A stage structured predator-prey model and its dependence on maturation delay and death rate, J. Math. Biol. 49 (2004), 188-200.
11. V. Grimm and C. Wissel, Babel, or the ecological stability discussions: An inventory and analysis of terminology and a guide for avoiding confusion, Oecologia 109 (1997), 323-34.
12. T. Gross and U. Feudel, Analytical search for bifurcation surfaces in parameter space, Physica D 195 (2004), 292-302.
13. T. Gross and U. Feudel, Generalized models as a universal approach to the analysis of nonlinear dynamical systems, Phys. Rev. E. 73 (2006), 016205.
14. T. Gross, W. Ebenhöh and U. Feudel, Enrichment and foodchain stability: The impact of different forms of predator-prey interaction, J. Theor. Biol. 227 (2004), 349-58.
15. T. Gross, W. Ebenhöh and U. Feudel, Long food chains are in general chaotic, Oikos 109 (2005), 135-44.
16. J. Guckenheimer and P. Holmes, "Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems and Bifurcations of Vector Fields," Springer, Berlin, 1985, 2 Ed.
17. A. Hastings, Age-dependent predation is not a simple process, i. continuous time models, Theor. Pop. Biol. 23 (1983), 347-62.
18. A. Hastings, Age-dependent dispersal is not a simple process: Density dependence, stability, and chaos, Theor. Pop. Biol. 41 (1992), 388-400.
19. C. S. Holling, Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism, Can. Entomol. 91 (1959), 385-98.
20. C. B. Huffaker, K. P. Shea and S. G. Herman, Experimental studies on predation: Complex dispersion and levels of food in an acarine predator-prey interaction, Hilgardia 34 (1963), 305-30.
21. V. A. A. Jansen, Regulation of predator-prey systems through spatial interactions: a possible solution to the paradox of enrichment, Oikos 74 (1995), 384-90.
22. K. L. Kirk, Enrichment can stabilize population dynamics: Autotoxins and density depen- cence, Ecology 79 (1998), 2456-62.
23. C. Kohlmeier and W. Ebenhöh, The stabilizing role of cannibalism in a predator-prey system, Bull. Math. Biol. 57 (1995), 401-11.
24. B. W. Kooi, Numerical bifurcation analysis of ecosystems in a spatially homogeneous environment, Acta Biotheor. 51 (2003), 189-222.
25. M. Kretzschmar, R. M. Nisbet and E. McCauley, A predator-prey model for zooplankton grazing on competing algal populations, Theor. Popul. Biol. 44 (1993), 32-66.
26. Y. A. Kuznetsov, "Elements of Applied Bifurcation Theory," Springer-Verlag, New York, 2004, 3rd Ed.
27. I. Loladze, Y. Kuang and J. J. Elser, Stoichiometry in producer-grazer systems: Linking energy flow with element cycling, Bull. Math. Biol. 62 (2000), 1137-62
28. H. Matsuda, P. A. Abrams and H. Hori, The effect of adaptive antipredator behavior on exploitative competition and mutualism between predators, Oikos 68 (1993), 549-59.
29. S. Petrovskii, B.-L. Li and H. Malchow, Transition to spatiotemporal chaos can resolve the paradox of enrichment, Ecol. Complex. 1 (2004), 37-47.
30. B. C. Rall, C. Guill and U. Brose, Food-web connectance and predator interference dampen the paradox of enrichment, Oikos 117 (2008), 202-13.
31. S. Rinaldi and A. Gragnani, Destabilizing factors in slow-fast systems, Ecol. Modell. 180 (2004), 445-60.
32. M. L. Rosenzweig, Paradox of enrichment: Destabilization of exploitation ecosystems in ecological time, Science 171 (1971), 385-87.
33. M. L. Rosenzweig and R. H. MacArthur, Graphical representation and stability conditions of predator-prey interactions, Am. Nat. 97 (1963), 209-23.
34. S. Roy and J. Chattopadhyay, The stability of ecosystems: A brief overview of the paradox of enrichment, J. Biosci. 32 (2007), 421-8.
35. G. D. Ruxton, W. S. C. Gurney and A. M. De Roos, Interference and generation cycles, Theor. Pop. Biol. 42 (1992), 235-53.
36. M. Scheffer and R. J. De Boer, Implications of spatial heterogeneity for the paradox of enrichment, Ecology 76 (1995), 2270-7.
37. D. Stiefs, T. Gross, R. Steuer and U. Feudel, Computation and visualization of bifurcation surfaces, Int. J. Bif. Chaos 18, 2008, to appear.
38. E. H. Van Nes and M. Scheffer, A strategy to improve the contribution of complex simulation models to ecological theory, Ecol. Mod. 185 (2005), 153-64.
39. M. Vos, B. W. Kooi, D. L. DeAngelis and W. M. Mooij, Inducible defences and the paradox of enrichment, Oikos 105 (2004), 471-80.
40. S. Wiggins, "Introduction to Applied Nonlinear Dynamical Systems and Chaos," Springer, New York, 1990.
41. M. H. F. Wilkinson, Predation in the presence of decoys: An inhibitory factor on pathogen control by bacteriophages or bdellovibrios in dense and diverse ecosystems, J. Theor. Biol. 208 (2001), 27-36.