Bayesian methods for control loop monitoring and diagnosis

Journal of Process Control

Volumn 18, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 829-838

  Huang, Biao ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bayesian methods; Bayesian network; Control monitoring; Diagnosis; Performance assessment; Process monitoring

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; CONTROL THEORY; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH; INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS; INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; MONITORING; PROBABILITY; PROBLEM SOLVING; PROCESS MONITORING; REMOTE CONTROL; ROBUST CONTROL; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS);

A-PRIORI; BAYESIAN FRAMEWORKS; BAYESIAN METHODS; BAYESIAN NETWORK; CONTROL LOOPS; CONTROL MONITORING; CONTROL PERFORMANCES; DIAGNOSING SYSTEM; DIAGNOSIS; FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIONS; MISSING DATA; MONITORING TECHNIQUES; OPTIMAL DECISION MAKING; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PROBABILISTIC DIAGNOSIS; PROCESS KNOWLEDGE;

PROCESS ENGINEERING;

EID: 52049095060     PISSN: 09591524     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2008.06.006     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Agarwal N., Huang B., and Tamayo E.C. Assessing MPC performance Part II: Bayesian approach for constraint tuning. Indus. Eng. Chem. Res. 46 (2007) 8112-8119
2. Agarwal N., Huang B., and Tamayo E.C. Assessing MPC performance Part I: Probabilistic approach for constraint analysis. Indus. Eng. Chem. Res. 46 (2007) 8101-8111
3. Basseville M., and Nikiforov I.V. Detection of Abrupt Changes (1993), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
4. Choudhury M., Shah S.L., and Thornhill N.F. Diagnosis of poor control-loop performance using higher-order statistics. Automatica 40 10 (2004) 1719-1728
5. Cooper G.F., and Herskovits E. A bayesian method for the induction of probabilitic networks from data. Mach. Learn. 9 (1992) 309-347
6. Harris T.J. Assessment of closed loop performance. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 67 (1989) 856-861
7. Harris T.J., Seppala C.T., and Desborough L.D. A review of performance monitoring and assessment techniques for univariate and multivariate control systems. J. Process Contr. 9 (1999) 1-17
8. Heckerman D., Breese J.S., and Rommeise K. Decison-theoretic troubleshooting. Commun. ACM 38 3 (1995) 49-57
9. A. Horch, Condition monitoring of control loops, PhD Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden, 2000.
10. Horch A., and Dumont G. Guest editorial. Int. J. Adapt. Contr. Signal Process. 17 (2003) 523-525 (special issue for control loop performance assessment)
11. Huang B. Multivariable model validation in the presence of time-variant disturbance dynamics. Chem. Eng. Sci. 55 (2000) 4583-4595
12. Huang B., Malhotra A., and Tamayo E.C. Model predictive control relevant identification and validation. Chem. Eng. Sci. 58 (2003) 2389-2401
13. Huang B., and Shah S.L. Control Loop Performance Assessment: Theory and Applications (1999), Springer Verlag, London
14. Jaynes B.T. Probability Theory - The Logic of Science (2001), Cambridge University Precess
15. Jelali M. An overview of control performance assessment technology and industrial applications. Contr. Eng. Pract. 14 (2006) 441-466
16. Kass R.E., and Wasserman L. The selection of prior distributions by formal rules. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc. 91 (1996) 1343-1370
17. Kesavan P., and Lee J.H. Diagnostic tools for multivariable model-based control systems. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 36 (1997) 2725-2738
18. Korb K.B., and Nicholson A.E. Bayesian Artificial Intelligence (2003), Chapman & Hall/CRC, UK
19. McNabb C.A., and Qin S.J. Projection based mimo control performance monitoring: Ii - measured disturbances and setpoint changes. J. Process Contr. 15 1 (2005) 89-102
20. K.P. Murphy, Dynamic Bayesian Networks: Representation, Inference and Learning, PhD Thesis, University of California, Berkeley, 2002.
21. A. Pernestal, A Bayesian approach to fault isolation with application to diesel engine diagnosis, PhD Thesis, KTH School of Electrical Engineering, Sweden, 2007.
22. Qin S.J. Control performance monitoring - a review and assessment. Comput. Chem. Eng. 23 (1998) 173-186
23. Rabiner L.R. A tutorial on hidden markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proc. IEEE 77 2 (1989) 257-286
24. Schafer J., and Cinar A. Multivariable mpc system performance assessment, monitoring, and diagnosis. J. Process Contr. 14 (2004) 113-129
25. Singh P., and Seto K. Analyzing apc performance. Chem. Eng. Progr. (2002) 60-66
26. Smyth P. Hidden markov models for fault detection in dynamic systems. Pattern Recogn. 279 (1994) 149-164
27. Thornhill N.F., and Hagglund T. Detection and diagnosis of oscillation in control loops. Contr. Eng. Pract. 5 10 (1997) 1343
28. Xu F., Huang B., and Akande A. Performance assessment of model predictive control for variability and constraint tuning. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 46 (2007) 1208-1219